seeformiles
Lost in the wood
I feel somewhat pointlessly pleased that I always thought he was an unfunny prick. No surprise now he’s a wrong ‘un.
Yes quite. I mean if you posted something insightful about Brand and structural misogyny in the entertainment industry in 2013 then great, let's see it. But 'I don't like him I think he's a cunt/wanker/smug' - ok so what?
Brand did, though. When I first saw him on telly, whenever that was, he was already boasting of the hundreds of women he'd shagged. He actually kept count, whether accurately or not. Just that fact marked him out as perverse. Every woman was a sexual conquest, another notch on his todger, so to speak. OK, other men do that as well, or talk the talk, but the sheer scale of his supposed exploits was a warning that he cared nothing about them whatsoever.If wrong 'uns, and abusive men in particular, came with a useful sign on them, that any discerning right thinking person could spot a mile off, that'd be great wouldn't it. But they really don't.
Go on, which thread?
i just dredged through the fucking thing, to refresh my memory, and belatedly thanks for this post from then. Kind of says it all.
That thread was a fecking nightmare and I think it would have gone better now, is all i was thinking.
I agree with this but wonder why that seems to be exactly what you and LDC are doing.If wrong 'uns, and abusive men in particular, came with a useful sign on them, that any discerning right thinking person could spot a mile off, that'd be great wouldn't it. But they really don't.
Link pleaseEr..
Link please
Underlying assumptions in there. Plenty women might have been well aware of all that and had no problem with it, still gladly had a meaningless encounter with him, not expecting to be 'cared for' as you put it at all. But the accusations are not about that , he's not being pulled up for too many 1 night stands he is accused of rape and abuse. Shagging around isnt the issue that's buying into his version, as already said by others.Brand did, though. When I first saw him on telly, whenever that was, he was already boasting of the hundreds of women he'd shagged. He actually kept count, whether accurately or not. Just that fact marked him out as perverse. Every woman was a sexual conquest, another notch on his todger, so to speak. OK, other men do that as well, or talk the talk, but the sheer scale of his supposed exploits was a warning that he cared nothing about them whatsoever.
You are supporting bimble either one or both of you can link to the offending thread if one or either of you are so convinced.
I'm not sure what you're getting at with "he's a totally different character now" than in 2013 or 2003. What, reformed? Worse? How is he a totally different character now than he was at the times the alleged incidents occurred?I really don't think there's much to be gained from trawling through decades-old posts about Brand. I can't even remember what I thought of him them - I don't recall ever being a fan - but he's a totally different character now and it's what people think now that matters.
You are the one being weird. Bimble and LDC are asserting that old style urban was horrendous/rapey and you're agreeing with them . If any of you can link to something specific to support what you're saying, please do. There seems to be a thread that Bimble's referring to and that you know about. Let's see it please.What are you convinced of here? You're being really weird.
We'd be better off if the otherside urbs were still with usplease drop this weird thing? Nobody is slagging off urban, we're all still here.
for the sake of fuck drop it please. Or sober up and read the links provided.You are the one being weird. Bimble and LDC are asserting that old style urban was horrendous/rapey and you're agreeing with them . If any of you can link to something specific to support what you're saying, please do. There seems to be a thread that Bimble's referring to and that you know about. Let's see it please.
You are the one being weird. Bimble and LDC are asserting that old style urban was horrendous/rapey and you're agreeing with them . If any of you can link to something specific to support what you're saying, please do. There seems to be a thread that Bimble's referring to and that you know about. Let's see it please.
A pound shop Jimmy Saville. A Rolf Harris who can't draw.I feel somewhat pointlessly pleased that I always thought he was an unfunny prick. No surprise now he’s a wrong ‘un.
You are the one being weird. Bimble and LDC are asserting that old style urban was horrendous/rapey and you're agreeing with them . If any of you can link to something specific to support what you're saying, please do. There seems to be a thread that Bimble's referring to and that you know about. Let's see it please.
What makes you think cesare is one over the eight? She seems entirely sober to me.for the sake of fuck drop it please. Or sober up and read the links provided.
You are the one being weird. Bimble and LDC are asserting that old style urban was horrendous/rapey and you're agreeing with them.
Thanks for the linkFrom following their quotes back it appears to be this one (not read it yet)..
Hundreds of women assaulted in German NYE celebrations
just another coat of kiwi buffed up and he's ready to rollwww.urban75.net
Which is all valid re the wider society but I'm failing to see how it applies to how old skool urban reacted to Russell Brand at the timeyes, it was a thread about hundreds of women reporting to the police that they had been sexually assaulted, and the experience of posting on that thread was that most people engaging with it at the time were inclined to believe, for righteous reasons, that those reports were lies. And it was horrible, posting on that thread. It was really bad. And I dont think that would have gone the same way now. I think it would be less bad.