Not really. In the early 1980s there was a desire to reduce road accidents, and younger drivers were viewed as being less trustworthy. For this reason the federal government wanted states to raise the age where one could legally drink to 21. (You'd think they'd address the driving issue first, but hey-ho.) When some were reluctant, they were threatened with having their highway budget cut -- the federal government subsidises this sort of thing. So they all caved in.The drinking age is 21 in many US states due to health concerns in drinking under 21 yrs, it's an acknowledgement that the brain is still developing and vulnerable to damage.
What the actual...ETA
I‘d add that the alleged story about him cramming his dick down her throat “because he wanted to see her mascara run” was also a red flag. Getting kicks from seeing a woman’s mascara running during oral sex is a pretty common kink. Kink must always always always be safe sane and consensual. If it’s not, it’s assault. If he did that, it implies he’s accustomed to taking what he wants without consent.
What the actual...
I'd never even heard of that kind of thing before this. And yet you're saying it's a pretty common kink?!? Really?
Eh?? Nope..Ireland has this. Age of consent is 17 or 15 when the age gap is 2 years or less.
Technically, Debbie Harry always expected you to call her.Little thought experiment here:
You're a guy who just turned 16. The year is 1965. You idolise Blondy and fancy Debby Harry (30 years old). You blag tickets to see her/them in concert. She stops the limousine and beckons you inside. You have a wild night and exchange numbers
Are you:
- traumatised
- exhilarated
Your parents find out and explain the power dynamics at play and that you are in shock and something awful just happened. She calls again.
Do you:
- go to the authorities and file a complaint
- sprint to her location
---
Ask this to 100 guys and 90%+ would say yes. Ask this to 100 women (with perhaps Jim Morrison instead), a lower but still high proportion would also say yes
Makes sense - driving is sacrosanct for some reason!Not really. In the early 1980s there was a desire to reduce road accidents, and younger drivers were viewed as being less trustworthy. For this reason the federal government wanted states to raise the age where one could legally drink to 21. (You'd think they'd address the driving issue first, but hey-ho.) When some were reluctant, they were threatened with having their highway budget cut -- the federal government subsidises this sort of thing. So they all caved in.
Britain is the same, can join the army at 16, drink vote etc at 18...why those bastard recruiters hang around school gatesThat's purely arbitrary. Look at the Americans where you're an adult at 18, can be sent off to war, get a mortgage, etc. But you can't drink until you're 21.
(I'm not promoting that, as it's clearly ridiculous, but just pointing out "Oh, you're an adult" has no real legal meaning. You could legislate anything the population will bear.)
Not really. In the early 1980s there was a desire to reduce road accidents, and younger drivers were viewed as being less trustworthy. For this reason the federal government wanted states to raise the age where one could legally drink to 21. (You'd think they'd address the driving issue first, but hey-ho.) When some were reluctant, they were threatened with having their highway budget cut -- the federal government subsidises this sort of thing. So they all caved in.
Not in 1965, she was 20 and still at college doing an arts degree, Blondie wasn't formed until 1974Technically, Debbie Harry always expected you to call her.
Little thought experiment here:
You're a guy who just turned 16. The year is 1965. You idolise Blondy and fancy Debby Harry (30 years old). You blag tickets to see her/them in concert. She stops the limousine and beckons you inside. You have a wild night and exchange numbers
Are you:
- traumatised
- exhilarated
Your parents find out and explain the power dynamics at play and that you are in shock and something awful just happened. She calls again.
Do you:
- go to the authorities and file a complaint
- sprint to her location
---
Ask this to 100 guys and 90%+ would say yes. Ask this to 100 women (with perhaps Jim Morrison instead), a lower but still high proportion would also say yes
Well if its legal, we're allowed to talk about it so fuck off.lawfully
And you're not stating any law. You're stating the definition of a child's age range
And this is a very important point. I actually had someone come up to me in the pub last night insisting that it was suspicious that women had only just come forward, like it's an easy thing for a young woman - or, indeed, child - to accuse a rich and powerful and much older man and face having their lives/privacy/careers ruined:
Alleged victims do not have faith in police, journalist says
Women choosing to report allegations of rape and sexual assault to journalists rather than the police is evidence of the lack of trust many people have in the authorities, a journalist working on the Brand story has told the BBC.
Rosamud Urwin, the Sunday Times media editor, says journalists have contacted the Metropolitan Police in London about the allegations about Brand.
Speaking to the BBC earlier, Urwin says there have been many reports in recent months of authorities failing victims who come forward, which makes people less likely to report alleged assaults to police.
"We've had a lot of stories about why women don't have faith in the criminal justice system to get justice, and within that the police."
She adds there are many reasons people don't want to report crimes and they "find coming to the media, as hard as it is, a preferable option".
Sure but the fact remains that many, many women will not report rape/sexual assault to the police for various reasons. I know a lot of women* who've been raped or sexually assaulted and none of them has reported it to the police.TBF I really wish journalists would not say things like that - for a start the media are not interested in investigating allegations of rape unless it is deemed newsworthy (and so financially worth investigating), so suggesting the media is an alternate way of reporting rape for every victim - or indeed the vast majority of victims - is just wrong.
Of course but how? I mean how to hold feet to the fire? How to educate the public? I mean Urban's pretty switched on but there are still some posters with pretty shocking attitudes on here.Secondly the solution to improving the quality of rape investigations and outcomes at court is to hold the police, CPS, government and Parliaments feet to the fire until it gets better (and it absolutely needs to) and also to educate the public into what rape actually is (ie: not just when some horror snatches a woman off the street, or breaks into her home).
Russell Brand's upcoming live shows have been postponed as police look into a claim of sexual assault from 2003.
A statement from the promoters of Brand's Bipolarisation tour said: "We are postponing these few remaining addiction charity fundraiser shows, we don't like doing it - but we know you'll understand."
yep. That's the depressingest bit imo.Sure but the fact remains that many, many women will not report rape/sexual assault to the police for various reasons. I know a lot of women* who've been raped or sexually assaulted and none of them has reported it to the police.
*Friends, people I know. I suspect the numbers are sadly not unusual.
Of course but how? I mean how to hold feet to the fire? How to educate the public? I mean Urban's pretty switched on but there are still some posters with pretty shocking attitudes on here.
oh fuccckkk offfff"addiction charity fundraiser shows"
I considered starting a thread on alternatives to the police last week. Not just on this issue but generally after a situation where there was little other option but call them for someone's wellbeing but at the same time not trusting them to deal with it at all.TBF I really wish journalists would not say things like that - for a start the media are not interested in investigating allegations of rape unless it is deemed newsworthy (and so financially worth investigating), so suggesting the media is an alternate way of reporting rape for every victim - or indeed the vast majority of victims - is just wrong.
Secondly the solution to improving the quality of rape investigations and outcomes at court is to hold the police, CPS, government and Parliaments feet to the fire until it gets better (and it absolutely needs to) and also to educate the public into what rape actually is (ie: not just when some horror snatches a woman off the street, or breaks into her home).
If you google that phrase, as I just did, without quotes, a number of hits will come up that will show that this is indeed a thing. What a time to be alive.
Apologies if this has been covered, but I caught elsewhere that his agent has dropped him?His tour has just been cancelled
I didn't see the whole of Dispatches but what I saw gave the impression that could be the case.Apologies if this has been covered, but I caught elsewhere that his agent has dropped him?
Which... is it reasonable to assume that it's very likely an agent would have heard about, if not actively assisted in covering up, these kind of allegations about one of their clients before they were made public? Particularly given the amount and... can't think of the right word, but over how many years the allegations span, basicalDid
Sure but the fact remains that many, many women will not report rape/sexual assault to the police for various reasons. I know a lot of women* who've been raped or sexually assaulted and none of them has reported it to the police.
*Friends, people I know. I suspect the numbers are sadly not unusual.
Of course but how? I mean how to hold feet to the fire? How to educate the public? I mean Urban's pretty switched on but there are still some posters with pretty shocking attitudes on here.