If it was a city/town centre camera then probably someone sitting watching a bank of screens and looks at a particular one if something happeningKind of curious as to who the camera operator is there - was it a banner on the side of WPB HQ, or are we just all subject to that level of surveillance when on the street?
Am i being dumb; if that's the case how did the Stalinist's get hold of it?If it was a city/town centre camera then probably someone sitting watching a bank of screen and looks at a particular one if something happening
Could be council/community safety/police shared
and yes we are subject to that level of surveillance in busy places with cameras
e2a just watched again and looks like a fixed camera on a building or pole
True!Am i being dumb; if that's the case how did the Stalinist's get hold of it?
Amateur-hour skullduggery from anti-Galloway poster-ripper weaponised by the WPB.
Relieved to hear that George's friends in the Militia/ MVD were very soon on the scene to despatch the vandal to the gulag.
View attachment 412919
YesKind of curious as to who the camera operator is there - was it a banner on the side of WPB HQ, or are we just all subject to that level of surveillance when on the street?
you reckon 13%?Lowest ever turnout (during World War 2) was 8.5% in Poplar South, 1942.
Lowest turnout in peace time was 18.2% in Manchester Central, 2012.
Rochdale will be in the middle, I'm very certain of that.
I'm not a betting person but around 11-13 feels right. 15 tops.you reckon 13%?
Interesting; like you, I wouldn't want to wager anything on that. I get that electorally it's a bit of a non-event, (and who in their right mind would bother to turn out to vote?), but it has had a lot of media attention/publicity. Maybe more people than usual will be aware that there's a by-election going on win their town. Might that mean that the figure isn't super low?I'm not a betting person but around 11-13 feels right. 15 tops.
Sometimes it goes the other way, if you're bombarded with leaflets and door knocking you just want it to stop and turnout suffers. The less than inspiring collection of candidates, disowned candidates, and George Galloway won't exactly have them tearing down the high street to a polling station I suspect.Interesting; like you, I wouldn't want to wager anything on that. I get that electorally it's a bit of a non-event, (and who in their right mind would bother to turn out to vote?), but it has had a lot of media attention/publicity. Maybe more people than usual will be aware that there's a by-election going on win their town. Might that mean that the figure isn't super low?
Ok, if we're having virtual wager; I'll go for 22% turnout.Sometimes it goes the other way, if you're bombarded with leaflets and door knocking you just want it to stop and turnout suffers. The less than inspiring collection of candidates, disowned candidates, and George Galloway won't exactly have them tearing down the high street to a polling station I suspect.
(Caveat: around 30% Muslim population, whilst not likely to vote 'en banc' as it were, could be an important factor in both turnout and victor)
I'm going to plump for 13%.Ok, if we're having virtual wager; I'll go for 22% turnout.
I'm going to plump for 13%.
This would beat the lowest ever by election turnout by over 5%. Even brogdale 's 22% comes 3rd on the list.
I knowLowest ever turnout (during World War 2) was 8.5% in Poplar South, 1942.
Lowest turnout in peace time was 18.2% in Manchester Central, 2012.
Rochdale will be in the middle, I'm very certain of that.
I know
Yes, that. Lots of things pushing the turnout down, but a well motivated pro Palestine vote. In theory, Galloway has a chance... Ali may well get it as a residual candidate... somebody might even win with around 30% of the vote. Or, if I really had to do a prediction it would be nobody gets over 40%.Sometimes it goes the other way, if you're bombarded with leaflets and door knocking you just want it to stop and turnout suffers. The less than inspiring collection of candidates, disowned candidates, and George Galloway won't exactly have them tearing down the high street to a polling station I suspect.
(Caveat: around 30% Muslim population, whilst not likely to vote 'en banc' as it were, could be an important factor in both turnout and victor)
I can't believe it'll go below 25%, so I'll go 26.Ok, if we're having virtual wager; I'll go for 22% turnout.
The stolen vote with film of ballot boxes being stuffed with....It will be absolutely hilarious if the puffed-up charity shop Saddam is denied by a Labour postal vote operation which cranked out enough votes for a candidate they have since dropped.
It will keep Galloway and his deluded membership of a dozen oddballs in conspiracy theories for years- and critically will keep him out of parliament.
Either way the winner of this election will be a stone in Labour's shoe for the next six months.
Do I hear 27? 27 anyone? No? For the last time......I can't believe it'll go below 25%, so I'll go 26.
The banner was on the side of the Sahara restaurant in RochdaleKind of curious as to who the camera operator is there - was it a banner on the side of WPB HQ, or are we just all subject to that level of surveillance when on the street?