I am sure the defendants and the legal support campaign would greatly welcome you volunteering your undoubtedly valuable time and expertise given the unwavering interest you have shown in what other people do and your acute analysis of how everyone else is doing it wrong/you think Stokes Croft and St. Paul's are shitholes/some crustie looked at you funny in 1993/etc.
I was unsure whether to dignify your petty post with a response. However, I am pretty sure I have never referred to either St Pauls or Stokes Croft as a shithole, but if you can provide some evidence of that please post it up.
As it happens, I have been visiting Stokes Croft since I was knee high to a grasshopper and we used to get the bus into Bristol from Pill so my dad could buy tropical fish in a shop where the Blue Mountain is now. As a teenager I used to go to Full Marks bookshop and meetings of the Bristol Animal Rights Group in the Bristol Tavern (now a restaurant). When I moved to Bristol in 1987 I always lived on or around Gloucester Road, and Stokes Croft/Montpelier was the place we chose to go drinking/clubbing - The Old England, The Bell, The Brewhouse, The Bristol Tavern, The Moon Club/Lakota, The Tropic Club. The Blue Mountain and the Malap (where the closed down Tesco is now) so I have very fond memories of the area. However, I have also worked in King Square for over 10 years so I am aware of the seedy side and see things going on away from the main drag, mostly from people living in the hostels. I do not claim to be an expert or have special knowledge, but I am just as much a "resident" of Stokes Croft as Chris Chalkley or Claire Milne, neither of whom live there as I understand.
Much as it pains you, you need to acknowledge that not everyone in the area is opposed to Tesco nor do they think riots are a good thing.
As for my position on the rioters, it's relatively straightforward. I think they are idiots but I do not think they deserve to have their lives ruined because hey got carried away in the heat of the moment. The reason I asked the question was because one of the people charged as a result of the riot is also charged with racially aggravated harrassment due to an incident at the mosque in Wade Street, where it is alleged that he skewered pieces of pork onto the railings. I was wondering if people involved in a defence fund had any qualms about defending people like this (although I am aware he is innocent until proven guilty etc). I personally would feel uncomfortable about it.