It's a sign of how completely useless Gavin Williamson is that he's been sidelined and Boris Johnson is now being put forward as a face of trust and competence to reassure parents it's safe to send kids back to school.
TBH I'm surprised that Williamson wasn't required to fall on his sword right after the GCSE results were released - I thought that was the only reason they were keeping him around.It's a sign of how completely useless Gavin Williamson is that he's been sidelined and Boris Johnson is now being put forward as a face of trust and competence to reassure parents it's safe to send kids back to school.
If I was a headteacher, I'd for damn sure be mandating masks for everyone in my school.Scottish headteacher on R4 'Today' this morning saying how, irrespective of any guidance to the contrary, they'd asked kids & parents to wear masks to & fro school & visors (for staff?) in school. Seemingly driven, in large part, by 27% vulnerable staff & 5 resignations citing concerns. An interesting line that may play out in many other schools with numbers of staff nearing retirement age?
Says a lot about the priorities of the authorsIn a 51 page report...one line
Where possible ensure appropriate ventilation.
Seriously. It doesn't even feature in their hierarchy of risk controls, where PPE comes last at the bottom of a triangle. Nice diagrams though.
There are two pages given over to which codes we should use in the school register for non-attendance.
My nephews are going back to school on different weeks (in Wales).
Not too sure why they are staggering it.
I heard that Williamson's wife is a teacher. I bet she's not really looking forward to walking into the staff room on the first day back!
Jesus - poor woman.
Seventeen teachers at Dundee school contract Covid-19Scottish headteacher on R4 'Today' this morning saying how, irrespective of any guidance to the contrary, they'd asked kids & parents to wear masks to & fro school & visors (for staff?) in school. Seemingly driven, in large part, by 27% vulnerable staff & 5 resignations citing concerns. An interesting line that may play out in many other schools with numbers of staff nearing retirement age?
So much for there being "much less transmission from children to adults than adults to adults" as claimed by Dr Fuckwhitty.
But, there's nothing in that report that suggest the teachers caught it from a child.
So what's the solution then? Leave the schools closed? If so for how long? until there is a vaccine which will be the end of the next year at best. Johnson and Williamson are making a complete hash of handling this but they are right about one thing. Children and especially those from more deprived backgrounds will lose out if they don't return to school and the longer it goes on the worst it will get.The virus spreads in schools. That should be enough. The focus on child-adult transmission is bullshit, a red herring being promulgated by a purported authority that has already demonstrated itself to be compromised.
The 'solution' to this rests in the dim, distant past when the Government should have developed a strategy to crush the virus with a timely and effective 'lockdown'....but we are where we are, with persistent community transmission.So what's the solution then? Leave the schools closed? If so for how long? until there is a vaccine which will be the end of the next year at best. Johnson and Williamson are making a complete hash of handling this but they are right about one thing. Children and especially those from more deprived backgrounds will lose out if they don't return to school and the longer it goes on the worst it will get.
So what's the solution then? Leave the schools closed? If so for how long? until there is a vaccine which will be the end of the next year at best. Johnson and Williamson are making a complete hash of handling this but they are right about one thing. Children and especially those from more deprived backgrounds will lose out if they don't return to school and the longer it goes on the worst it will get.
Numbers are science too. Don't make the mistake (that the government want you to make) of thinking that any reference to 'science' is only talking about virology/epidemiology/health - behavioural and economic science are the driving factors behind most of their decisions.At the same time as we are constantly being told in that back-to-school guidance that everything is being done within the bounds of "the science" we are fed this meaningless drivel of numbers that are simply politically driven.
My sister teaches quite a lot of said children and they have kept their schools open throughout lockdown. When not at school she has been offering remote learning and support to said children. All the staff at her school have been doing the same.Children and especially those from more deprived backgrounds will lose out if they don't return to school and the longer it goes on the worst it will get.
Well exactly; the government's approach to re-opening schools makes complete sense from the perspective of (very) short term, economic recovery. Beyond that, it looks like a very risky and potentially costly, counter-productive punt that puts the health of millions at further risk.Numbers are science too. Don't make the mistake (that the government want you to make) of thinking that any reference to 'science' is only talking about virology/epidemiology/health - behavioural and economic science are the driving factors behind most of their decisions.
And cases at a linked primary and after school club.
I guess it's impossible to know though as presumably only staff/children with symptoms were tested - so we only know many more adults were symptomatic than children, not the numbers that are actually infected. Could be that loads of the children are silently infectious and have spread it to staff - in fact that makes more sense as children will not be social distancing from each other or staff, but adults will be avoiding contact with each other.But, there's nothing in that report that suggest the teachers caught it from a child.
What sort of response has she had to offering remote learning?, Mrs Q school has also been offering remote learning and whilst it started off without about 70-80% of the kids turn up for online lessons this quite rapidly fell to more like 30-40% quite quickly.My sister teaches quite a lot of said children and they have kept their schools open throughout lockdown. When not at school she has been offering remote learning and support to said children. All the staff at her school have been doing the same.
Without knowing all of the data, you can't even say that with any certainty. It might be that the research on the long-term health benefits of education (in terms of life expectancy through greater economic attainment) mean that on average, the number of children that will die from going back to school now are much lower than the cumulative impact of missing out on education measured in the long-term.Beyond that, it looks like a very risky and potentially costly, counter-productive punt that puts the health of millions at further risk.
The 'solution' to this rests in the dim, distant past when the Government should have developed a strategy to crush the virus with a timely and effective 'lockdown'....but we are where we are, with persistent community transmission.