i make that about 5% (im shit at maths - is that right?)Edited: moved from other thread as this is more appropriate....
News from Berlin doesn't look great re: schools.
Summary... Berlin has 825 schools. Less than 2 weeks after them opening at least 41 of them have reported teachers or students being infected.
Virus cases reported at 41 schools in Germany's capital
BERLIN (AP) — At least 41 schools in Berlin have reported that students or teachers have become infected with the coronavirus not even two weeks after schools reopened in the German capital.apnews.com
i make that about 5% (im shit at maths - is that right?)
can this thread be moved to covid forum please? and maybe date take out of the thread title? thanks mods
Yeah thanks I didHave you reported this post of yours? The request is more likely to be seen if reported, rather than a mod happening across it at a later stage.
Absolutely... Seems pretty high to meYup, not a huge percentage although that is in just 2 weeks.
I just can't see how even if the deaths and hospitalizations are low related to school infections that It still won't be hugely disruptive to classes and teaching with schools and some groups within them having to isolate regularly due to infection or a possible infection.
Prof Whitty said it looked as if "there is much less transmission from children to adults than adults to adults".
Data shows that staff spreading the virus to other members of staff is "maybe actually more important than staff members catching it from pupils", Prof Whitty said.
This is a consensus statement from the Chief Medical Officers and Deputy Chief Medical Officers of England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales on the current evidence of risks and benefits to health from schools and childcare settings reopening.
It takes into account UK and international studies, and summaries of the scientific literature from SAGE, the DELVE Group of the Royal Society, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, and data from the Office for National Statistics.
The current global pandemic means that there are no risk-free options, but it is important that parents and teachers understand the balance of risks to achieve the best course of action for their children.
"On average, your dead kid is better off because he returned to school."I think Whitty should argue the case in person with those parents whose children have fallen ill or died due to the virus, I'm sure they'll find such reasoning to be totally convincing.
When do you think that the schools should re-open?"On average, your dead kid is better off because he returned to school."
I don't know. The CMOs aren't wrong, assuming they're reading the stats properly, but that's not much comfort to the actual individuals that will be affected, whether that's families losing members because kids have brought infection home, or teachers dying. There is no right answer, unfortunately, and this is only going to roll on and on - there will be arguments next summer about whether that tranche of kids had a fair shot at their exams, and whether the score uplift this year has disadvantaged everyone coming along after.When do you think that the schools should re-open?
When do you think that the schools should re-open?
Tbh after all the thousands of needless deaths caused by the government's pisspoor handling of the pandemic I'd be gobsmacked if they made some uncharacteristically sensible decisions around opening schools along the lines you suggestI'm a school governor and we do have a "safer" plan with small groups, social distancing etc but it means children being in on a rota with 50% in person and 50% at home learning. That is the school management's preferred option, but it's not going to allowed by government.
Yes, it was mentioned three or four times during my C19 Health and Safety induction that PPE was the least effective and last method of measures the college would be taking or promoting.It's not a question of when, an inference that seems to be based on uppity education unions never wanting a return because they all hate the kids, but 'how'. And we, school staff in education unions, are getting uppity because what we see instead of good practical advice is boxes being ticked and grand words said.
I work in education in a school in Wales. I've read in full the operational guidance for schools return. It's completely inadequate and based on fitting a version of the evidence to a political will to return, seemingly because that is what those in power think will get votes.
The argument for PPE is buried deep in the advice, and the advice is against PPE. All the emphasis is placed on hand wash hygiene, social distancing and the need for regular deep cleaning. Ignoring the fact that my particular school, being a PRU, doesn't even come under the county cleaning contract, meaning we are responsible for finding our own staff to voluntarily do deep cleaning (yes, really), the report blithely dismisses the efficacy of PPE, instead asking us to keep staff "at front of class" and a metre away from children. No mention is made of the thousands of teaching assistants whose job is to provide close-up 1:1 support for children. The best that is offered states; Following any risk assessment, where the need for PPE has been identified, it should be readily available and provided by the employer.
Note that word 'should'. There is no mandatory condition. Returning to work briefly in the summer term our staff found zero PPE provision. And for that matter minimal hand washing provision (we were provided with an outside wash basin that only had water in if the caretaker was available to keep it supplied - our caretaker covers two sites).
Like a lot of things in schools, the guidance has been cobbled together to tick boxes rather than provide proper practical support. The need for the correct piece of paper (much like risk assessments) takes precedence over practical detail.
And in a pandemic, a fucking pandemic, that's shameful.
No PPE is required when undertaking routine educational activities in classroom or school settings.
Stuff the 'when'. It's about the 'how'. Except, for those in authority and those with votes to gain, it isn't.
Schools have always been disease transmission centres. I'm sick of hearing how the kids have nothing to fear. It's not just about the kids. It's about the innumerable amount of contacts that come from kids-teaching staff-families of all.
Those of us who have studying risk assessment can confirm that PPE is generally considered the last line of measures considered to mitigate risk, but there are generally supposed to be various other steps taken to minimise risks including introducing safer ways of working where these are possible, which seem fairly sketchy in the government's return to school plans, to say the least.Yes, it was mentioned three or four times during my C19 Health and Safety induction that PPE was the least effective and last method of measures the college would be taking or promoting.
You certainly shouldn't be putting all your efforts into PPE when other measures could be much more effective at reducing risk
I work in education in a school in Wales. I've read in full the operational guidance for schools return. It's completely inadequate and based on fitting a version of the evidence to a political will to return, seemingly because that is what those in power think will get votes.
Does the guidance have anything to say about ventilation in indoor spaces? I’d see this as a critical issue.
That's either leave the windows open and sod the weather or follow kebabking's strategy of a megaphone on the sports fieldIn a 51 page report...one line
Where possible ensure appropriate ventilation.
Seriously. It doesn't even feature in their hierarchy of risk controls, where PPE comes last at the bottom of a triangle. Nice diagrams though.
There are two pages given over to which codes we should use in the school register for non-attendance.