That’s the least of it. It seems highly likely that the solution to the attainment gap is going to be “don’t let any kids who might underachieve in core subjects do any creative or practical subjects until next May. Or if it’s easier, make that the rule for all the kids. And that’s explicitly also true for gcse students, who don’t really need to do any enriching subjects, regardless of what that does to their total GCSEs count/ breadth of options at A level.”
It looks suspiciously like instead of there being any mitigation in how gcse and a level are examined next summer, the answer is to “drop weaker kids from less academic courses and give them more maths and English” - a timetabling impossibility, acknowledged by the guidance that schools may choose to do this to all the kids (allowing, I dunno, dance teachers to teach extra maths?). And while I have hope that my very arts orientated school will stand its ground, the fear of taking a dip in annual gcse progress tables (and therefore local league tables) and thereby triggering a punitive ofsted inspection, will undoubtedly motivate huge numbers of schools to play it safe and sacrifice arts education (and other practical and vocational courses).
It’s all looking pretty fucking grim. Notwithstanding my medical vulnerability having been dismissed by central govt as not something anyone will be worrying about any more.