I've ignored nothing. All you did was ignore my question and claim to have said things while ignoring criticisms of what you did say.
#537
Seriously. You're just being ridiculous telling me I'm ignoring
you.
If you don't like what i say, that's too bad, but don't tell me I'm ignoring you when I answer you directly.
You said that you didn't say what Spymaster summarised you as having said but weren't able to point to any difference in meaning between that and an exact quote of yours from an earlier post.
Because they are two completely different statements and quite frankly I'm not wasting my time explaining how they are different to people who should know better. If you think you're smart enough to bandy about accusations of racism to someone - without any evidence (despite my inviting at least 3 people to do so) - then you should be smart enough not to misquote and misrepresent what someone says. If you can't even do that, don't expect me to take you seriously while you continue to accuse me of being worse than the woman in that clip.
You've said that you're 'the only one who advocated a sensible response' without providing any evidence that anyone in the US has been successfully prosecuted for racist harassment alone or providing any evidence that New Jersey police are in the habit of turning up to such calls.
That's absurd and you fucking know it is. Don't even bother trying to justify such a stupid assertion; to attempt to impose such a ludicrous burden of proof is beneath contempt and completely irrelevant when the driver himself says "i'm calling the cops"! If he thought the cops were racist/useless then why even suggest it? Why would you even contemplate such a thing if you know directly that the cops are going to at best not help?
The only way you're going to get proper justice for this is if you call the cops; that's the only reasonable option. That doesn't mean he should get harassed or attacked by the cops either - and you haven't provided any proof that would happen yourself, so don't lecture me about levels of proof.
If you think i'm going to spend my time researching cop behaviour in Smalltown USA you're off your nut.
And you've said that you've criticised the woman's behaviour more than anyone else on the thread while neglecting to mention that that's because you've made more than 4 times as many posts as anyone else or that you also made a lot of excuses for her behaviour.
Wrong again, it's because i've been called out by people, including professional trolls who only came to this thread because they saw my name and saw a chance to stir the shit. Plenty of people actually agreed with my original post about uploading youtube. THat point has not changed at all and is entirely the point I've made. Nothing more. If you're content to be led up the garden path by cunts like butchersapron, a fuckwinkle so stupid he continues posting knowing full well i have him on ignore, then more fool you.
That's not debating, it's completely dishonest, disrespectful to people who have bothered to engage with you and is why most of those who have have got frustrated and resorted to abuse.
This is just bullshit. Defending myself from constant snide remarks and insinutations of some of the nastiest behaviour a human can engage in - despite NO evidence of such in my character - is what's dishonest and disrespectful. I have responded to almost every post with honesty and truthfulness; you're just sour because you don't like the response. Don't lecture me about my behaviour when you aren't even courteous enough to read the response you get when you ask me a question. Pull shit like that and you can join cunts like Butchers in the fucking phantom zone.
If you ever did have a point to make (which I disagree with)
This doesn't even make sense. Either I have a point or I dont - turns out I do since you acknowledge that I've made on by saying you disagreed with it. Fine, that's up to you. But don't be a cunt about it.
it was about Youtube but you completely ignored that in favour of repeatedly writing long posts lying about 'what you did say' when anyone can go back and read the beginning of the thread and see what you actually said.
I haven't lied about anything and this kind of disingenuous snide wank is exactly the sort of behaviour i've just outlined. The sort of intellectual cowardice that even moderators engage in. pathetic. This site purports to be progressive and broad minded, it certainly implies as much. This thread demonstrates that's very far from the truth and that there are too many cowards and self righteous arseholes who haven't an ounce of wit intellect or integrity and have nothing better to offer a discussion than their own petty little schoolyard prejudices.