Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Proportional representation -- yea or nay?

Should Britain adopt a form of PR for general elections


  • Total voters
    121
BTW lib-demmers, do not assume that your 22% under a FTP system will be replicated under a PR model - half your votes are on loan from the real parties and i don't think the swing back the other way would make up for the loss, not if you look at where votes come from/go.
Maybe, but conversely, there are a fair few Labour votes that would go to the Greens or a new socialist party in PR.

For instance, I've only ever voted twice, and it was for Labour both times. I would not dream of voting Labour if we had pr.
 
I think that their votes would go to other new parties, rather than to the big two.

Why, they'd be wasted votes the same way as we have now -the big three will squat there hoovering all votes except those of regional napoleons. Do have a look at how PR actually works in europe.
 
Maybe, but conversely, there are a fair few Labour votes that would go to the Greens or a new socialist party in PR.

For instance, I've only ever voted twice, and it was for Labour both times. I would not dream of voting Labour if we had pr.

There aren't. They'd stick with the labour party as they need all their support to present the biggest influence in the coalition. That's how it works.
 
The greens have been in government in Germany.

They have, and they supported the worst neo-liberal atacks the w/c has seen post war, they supported attacks on jobs, attacks on the welfare state, they supported attacks on pensions, they supported attacks on the NHS, they moved decisively rightwards. They got dragged - no one else.
 
BTW lib-demmers, do not assume that your 22% under a FTP system will be replicated under a PR model - half your votes are on loan from the real parties and i don't think the swing back the other way would make up for the loss, not if you look at where votes come from/go.

i only vote libdem as a vote for PR - once libdem is introduced i'll vote for green, (or possibly other smaller parties, have to see who stands at the time) as in local elections - i wonder how many other libdem voters are of a similar mind?

EDIT: as said above ... sorry donig three things at once here
 
They have, and they supported the worst neo-liberal atacks the w/c has seen post war, they supported attacks on jobs, attacks on the welfare state, they supported attacks on pensions, they supported attacks on the NHS, they moved decisively rightwards. They got dragged - no one else.
Hmmm. That's depressing – co-opted into power and so neutralised.

I'm guessing their rationale will have been that they were mitigating the worst effects of such policies. After all, that's what being a politician is, ultimately, doing what you think is possible. For example, the Greens here have set out a very explicit programme for redistributive taxation. If they backed down on that to prop up a Labour government, they'd ask something in return for backing down.

But yes, that is how seemingly decent people can end up doing terrible things. :(
 
give the UK greens a chance! So thats what happened in germany - doesnt mean it will happen here. One step at a time...
 
The alternative is nihilism, though, butchers. If I lived in Brighton, I would have gone and voted, and I'd have voted Green. And I'd have been pleased to have a Green MP. It might not be worth that much, but it would make it a tiny bit better to walk the streets.

There's nothing wrong with a bit of hope! And there's something to be said for standing up and saying you are there, even if you know it will come to nothing.
 
The alternative is not nihilism it's communism. I don't like being associated with pessimism or nihilism (not saying that in an arsey way ), i'm as optimistic as they come - this crisis has developed out of our strength. Pointing out the German Greens vile neo-liberalism is not nihilism, to think it is is a damaging failure of perspective.
 
Fair enough.

I wasn't trying to imply that your comment on the German greens was nihilism, though, but the implied suggestion that the greens would go the same way here too borders on nihilism, if it means that you stay disengaged. I would vote if we had pr, and I'd vote either green or for a socialist party. That would not mean that I endorsed the system. It would just mean that I thought it worthwhile, on balance, to walk in and vote.

Even though I didn't vote this week, I am under no illusion that my not voting was a meaningful stand. It wasn't. In the US, the right wing actually points to the low turnout as an indication of how well the system works! In Latin America, 'democracy' has survived in decades in places like Colombia with turnouts as low as 20%.
 
butchersapron said:
The alternative is not nihilism it's communism. I don't like being associated with pessimism or nihilism (not saying that in an arsey way ), i'm as optimistic as they come - this crisis has developed out of our strength. Pointing out the German Greens vile neo-liberalism is not nihilism, to think it is is a damaging failure of perspective.

In what sense is the fuckup of obfuscated multipackaged debts a crisis that has sprung from our strength?
 
littlebabyjesus said:
Fair enough.

I wasn't trying to imply that your comment on the German greens was nihilism, though, but the implied suggestion that the greens would go the same way here too borders on nihilism, if it means that you stay disengaged.

No it doesn't. It means that the pressures acting on labour that caused it to dump thempretense of socialism are the same pressures acting on any borgeoise party- the dictates of the market create the boundaries of acceptable policy making in the absence of a bellicose working class.

Recognizing that the greens would do as they are told just like any other party is realism not nihilism.
 
In what sense is the fuckup of obfuscated multipackaged debts a crisis that has sprung from our strength?

You know how, they can't invest in surplus value producing stuff in this country/area, they have to move into finance, they have too much money, they have to get rid off, we get cheap credit - you know the analysis.

And i didn't say it was as a result of our victories but our strength - they're massively different important things and massively different in important ways, and key to here we go from here.
 
butchersapron said:
You know how, they can't invest in surplus value producing stuff in this country/area, they have to move into finance, they have too much money, they have to get rid off, we get cheap credit - you know the analysis.

And i didn't say it was as a result of out victories but our strength - they're massively different important things and massively different in important ways.


Thanks- I hadn't seen it that way. Thought you meant the simple reading of your post.
 
Recognizing that the greens would do as they are told just like any other party is realism not nihilism.
I understand that point, and largely agree with it. I think I'm just looking at much smaller prizes – there is not just one way that politics can be played out, and who it is that is 'doing as they're told' does make a difference. They don't just do as they're told – politicians with enough balls can push a little in the other direction too.
 
I didn't realise until this was mentioned in the media that the UK doesn't have this already, I had just assumed.

Its nuts that its not being used, Ireland has had it for ages and it works well.
 
Back
Top Bottom