I'm really good at pretending to listen and then just doing whatever I like anyway. Oh, wait...
Prince Harry
- Thread starter T & P
- Start date
Serge Forward
Just enjoyin' my coffee.
Nobody can say anything now... and if you say you're English, you'll be arrestedHow predictable - so nobody can have their own opinion without the fear of offending. great
ElizabethofYork
Old Crone
Quite a lot of people give a fuck actually. 181 pages here, for a start!Talk about flogging a dead horse
I'm waiting for the 'leaked' sex tape - theres bound to be one on the go
And cut out the misogyny please.
Lol... Andrew currently has 30 bedrooms in his house paid for by us. He's being downgraded to a mere 5 bedrooms (of which we paid for the redecoration of - until they were kicked out of the family and had to pay it back - to Charles, not to us).
And Harold and Megz now have to make do with their own mansion in the Californian hills. As to how Harold is allowed to freely travel between the US and the UK after openly admitting he was a coke fiend
Aladdin
Well-Known Member
We have also had two women presidents.
Mickey D happens to be very decent...and is genuinely very likeable.
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Ireland's not a great place to point at when decrying the idea of a constitutional president. The country has done pretty well with its choices over the last three decades.
Agent Sparrow
the age of slippers and migraines
T & P
|-o-| (-o-) |-o-|
I’ve never really understood the ‘I’d rather have a flawed Royal as head of State than President Boris Johnson or Donald Trump’ argument that monarchists regularly put forward. Heads of State in non-monarchic democratic nations can be removed by the electorate at the next election if they are deemed unfit for purpose. Which we can’t do here no matter how rotten the incumbent monarch might turn out to be.
I can only think monarchists must be happy to financially support nonces
Agent Sparrow
the age of slippers and migraines
Nah, all humans mentalise but aren’t psychologists.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Such a pity he heads a 26 co state
UrbaneFox
They've doubled in price
There will be a few more volumes about how shittily they have been treated since they wrote their books.
Abrupt notes telling them to leave Frogmore, refund the decorating costs, side seat at the Coronation, not allowed to wear his favourite hat, maybe a showdown at some point, told off by the Army etc etc etc.
I'm quite looking forward to the highlights.
Frogmore Cottage: Harry and Meghan 'requested to vacate' property
It was earlier reported that the home, in Windsor, had been offered to Prince Andrew.
www.bbc.co.uk
Last edited:
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
We form joint attention with others from an early age. And from that we form joint intentions. That requires us to consider the minds of others - what do I know you know, what do I know you know I know you know, etc. And from that comes the realisation that you're not me, you have your own things going on that I need to understand if I am to form joint intentions with you. That's doing psychology, no?
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
We also make excuses for others. They act like that because X,Y,Z. We tell stories about why people are as they are. We try to understand. I think that crosses the boundary into doing psychology.
Agent Sparrow
the age of slippers and migraines
That is mentalisation, which is one of many psychological theories. Psychology is the scientific study of the mind, brain, behaviour etc. and both creates and is driven by theory.
Those other fuckers can do my end of term essay then.
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
This may be recursive in an Ouroboros kind of way, but is it then a theory of psychology that we are all amateur psychologists?
Here's a uni exam paper.
q.1 Not sure I understand the question, and not knowing exactly what they mean by 'schema', I'd probably go off in the wrong direction.
q.2 Can't answer that.
q.3 I definitely could waffle an answer to that. I'm sure it wouldn't score many marks, but I might well say one or two good things.
q.4 I'd have a stab at that and probably say a bunch of things that they're not looking for. Doesn't mean what I would say would be wrong, though.
q.5 I'd say a bunch of things in answer to that question that wouldn't be what they're after. I'd certainly miss important things, not having read the relevant texts. But it wouldn't be a totally useless answer.
q.6 Can't answer that. Don't know what it is.
They only want two answers. I'd go for qs 3. and 4. I'd fail no doubt. But as an amateur psychologist, I wouldn't be totally hopeless.
spellbinder
Well-Known Member
Changed out of courtesy to you, offence was not my intention, its just a word.
i'll not use it again. I wouldn't want to put people off their soy lattes.
The irony of your hypocrisy wasn't lost on this fuckwit
out of curiosity if a woman calls another woman that same word is it still misogyny - its still directed to a female at the end of the day
JimW
支那暗杀团
It's a contribution to a culture of misogyny. As if words don't matter in human interactions. What's weak is lacking the restraint to express yourself better.
spellbinder
Well-Known Member
To you it maybe but to me its a word used in my everyday life, others can take it as they like but to me its used by my circle of friends/ colleagues (including women) as normal swear words, it makes me laugh at the way people cringe at the use of cunt - again, its just another word.
Saying that, i don't use those words outside of the people i know won't take it to heart. the same way i don't use them around children. It's all about context. And i know now not to use it on here again.
It's irrelevant anyway people on here see me as a woman hating idiot. i'm fine with that as they don't know me and their opinions don't matter to me. i'm not here to make friends i have enough outside the internet
I'm sure it will please the thread to know thats me done with this, its a waste of time and energy.
andysays
Love and solidarity
To you it maybe but to me its a word used in my everyday life, others can take it as they like but to me its used by my circle of friends/ colleagues (including women) as normal swear words, it makes me laugh at the way people cringe at the use of cunt - again, its just another word.
Saying that, i don't use those words outside of the people i know won't take it to heart. the same way i don't use them around children. It's all about context. And i know now not to use it on here again.
It's irrelevant anyway people on here see me as a woman hating idiot. i'm fine with that as they don't know me and their opinions don't matter to me. i'm not here to make friends i have enough outside the internet
I'm sure it will please the thread to know thats me done with this, its a waste of time and energy.
If cunt is just a word, you surely won't object to being labelled one, you cunt.
Our entire reality is constructed from words, and from the narrative elements that those word make. The concept of a “gold-digging bitch” taps into a shared idea of women, acting to reproduce and normalise the assumptions that underlie the idea. You can only use it as a shorthand in the first place because you know that we know what you mean by it. And by using that little linguistic shorthand, by being able to assume that we’re all on the same page that one category of “woman” is “gold-digging bitch”, we all share this common reality. And that re-makes this reality as something that is part of our culture.
That’s why people object, spellbinder. It’s not to do with an individual attack on one woman, and it’s not to do with not “liking” a single word. It’s because the phrase as a whole speaks to a worldview that is misogynistic, and they don’t want the assumptions that lie behind that worldview to pass freely.
That’s why people object, spellbinder. It’s not to do with an individual attack on one woman, and it’s not to do with not “liking” a single word. It’s because the phrase as a whole speaks to a worldview that is misogynistic, and they don’t want the assumptions that lie behind that worldview to pass freely.
If you’re volunteering to do psychology essays, do you fancy having a go at one of these…? Take that amateur psychologising up to the Masters level!This may be recursive in an Ouroboros kind of way, but is it then a theory of psychology that we are all amateur psychologists?
Here's a uni exam paper.
View attachment 365113
q.1 Not sure I understand the question, and not knowing exactly what they mean by 'schema', I'd probably go off in the wrong direction.
q.2 Can't answer that.
q.3 I definitely could waffle an answer to that. I'm sure it wouldn't score many marks, but I might well say one or two good things.
q.4 I'd have a stab at that and probably say a bunch of things that they're not looking for. Doesn't mean what I would say would be wrong, though.
q.5 I'd say a bunch of things in answer to that question that wouldn't be what they're after. I'd certainly miss important things, not having read the relevant texts. But it wouldn't be a totally useless answer.
q.6 Can't answer that. Don't know what it is.
They only want two answers. I'd go for qs 3. and 4. I'd fail no doubt. But as an amateur psychologist, I wouldn't be totally hopeless.
Agent Sparrow
the age of slippers and migraines
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Perhaps you could elaborate on why you think it hypocrisyThe irony of your hypocrisy wasn't lost on this fuckwit
seeformiles
Lost in the wood
The Poundstretcher near me is recruiting. I could put in a good word for him?
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
No, contact him and say how sorry you are to hear things haven't gone well for him lately and this might help him pick himself up from the ground
Similar threads
