What people pay attention to will be largely determined by what they already think.
From Prince Andrew's point of view, if he wants to salvage his image, then who does he want to salvage it with?
There are lots of people who have already decided he's guilty of the worst, based on various things including his reputation, and his completely bizzare interview performance, but not on any conclusive evidence. There's not really anything that would change their minds.
But there must also be a fair few people (unlikely to be represented in any number on u75 but quite likely to be Telegraph readers) who would agree everything looks very weird, but don't think wrongdoing has been proven. They will have their own explanations for the bizarre interview, they may think he is simply naive or is trapped in a strange bubble where his view of "normal" has become distorted. They will probably accept the idea that he settled in order to avoid distraction and trouble during the jubilee - that's not an implausible explanation if you are starting out with some sort of sympathy for him. They will read this article, they will probably think the photo is bizarre, but it's something produced by the Maxwells not Prince Andrew. They will pick up on the suggestions of inconsistency in Guiffre's story, they will note the other thing mentioned in the article, that she has dropped her accusations against someone else and decided that she mistook his identity.
The bath photo is unquestionably bizzare - I'm pretty sure the Telegraph editors will know this - and they will know that it will attract a lot of attention to the story attached to it, which contains some information that might not be unhelpful to Prince Andrew in the eyes of those already willing to give him some benefit of the doubt.