Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

"Woman serving 20 year jail sentence for child sex trafficking says she has no memory that one of the children she sex-trafficked was nonced by her 'dear friend' whom she clearly has no reason to defend"

It's not pithy, but still a good headline...
Indeed. 'Oh yes, I do remember taking that snap. We'd trafficked the girl so that HRH could rape her later that night'... probably wouldn't help her future appeals.
 
By fitting two adults in a bath we show that you can’t fit t… oh.
They don't even show one end of the bath. Anyway, from the Telegraph's wiki:

It was founded by Arthur B. Sleigh in 1855 as The Daily Telegraph & Courier. Considered a newspaper of record over The Times in the UK in the years up to 1997,[5] The Telegraph generally has a reputation for high-quality journalism, and has been described as being "one of the world's great titles".[6]
 
None of what they are saying makes sense. And that photo is the work of a lunatic.

Are these people alright?
It’s been widely reported he’s recently launched a PR offensive with a view to restoring his former status and even trying to clear his name in court. Last week we had three former girlfriends/ pals speaking in public out of the blue declaring their belief he’s innocent. And also an opinion piece in the Telegraph by Charles Moore the other day also stating that sentiment.

But one thing is letting some of your columnists indulge in a bit of nutjobbery deep in the paper in the name of freedom of speech, and another to allow a historic and venerable pillar of the British press (putting its political leaning aside) to feature a clearly commissioned and indescribably desperate and absurd story on their front page that even the Mail might have been embarrassed to run.

I suspect there might be a lot of unhappy Telegraph journalists wondering if they’ve walked into the Express office today by mistake.
 
Are the Telegraph really claiming that nobody could ever have got up to naughty times in a bath? Because it’s just not possible?
no, they are reporting that Maxwell's family is claiming that... which is a bit different. still weird it is a front page though.
 
But those close to the Duke say he always wanted to fight the allegations in court and was talking into agreeing to a deal by the palace who feared the bad publicity would overshadow the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee.

"Andrew felt as if he was in a pressure cooker, as if he was given no option but to settle,” a source told The Mail on Sunday. “But he never wanted to settle and has always insisted he was innocent. He wants to see what legal routes might be available to him."



I don't think a "the queen made me do it" argument is going to do much to restore his reputation but it'll be funny if he tries - maybe he's watching Spare become one of the best-selling memoirs in history and reckons he could cash in with his own royal tell-all.
‘My mum made me admit to rape so it wouldn’t spoil her party’ is quite the claim.
 
I'd have thought that most people at the paper would've had sex in a bath at some point. The idea that none of them said, 'hang on, this is absurd' seems bizarre.
The bit of the article that you can see in that picture says that him kissing her toes isn't possible, which is... an odd thing to say.
 
Anyone who thinks that isn't enough space for a nookie has led a very sheltered life and not had to do it on the backseat of their Mum's VW beetle
 
Back
Top Bottom