Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Followed by Charles, dressed as a corgiIt would have been the ultimate sign of respect to keep her as our beloved queen and just wheel the coffin round when she had duties of state.
Followed by Charles, dressed as a corgiIt would have been the ultimate sign of respect to keep her as our beloved queen and just wheel the coffin round when she had duties of state.
Good lord, I do love a good "that's really not the argument you think it is..." retortThere’s no need for the head of state to be separate from the head of government. It could be the same person. Indeed, maybe try having no head of state. The argument “they don’t really do anything, it’s just symbolic” isn’t really the argument for retaining the post that people seem to think it is…
Indeed. “Glorious” Revolution and Bill of Rights and all that.The problem with your analysis is that it's not the King's role to keep his majesty's government in its constitutional limits. It's really quite the other way round.
Now that would be an imageFollowed by Charles, dressed as a corgi
He was only following rules.Prince Charles doesn't have any say in it though does he? It's determined by rules set out in some Act or other.
Prince Charles doesn't have any say in it though does he? It's determined by rules set out in some Act or other.
Spaniel.It's King Charles
Spaniel.
Elton, as is traditional, is releasing a reworded version of an old hit.Yeah, I've found myself calling him King Spaniel.
BBC version was he was stepping back from public life.Prince Charles doesn't have any say in it though does he? It's determined by rules set out in some Act or other.
Yes, the law set by parliament in fact. It seems that the argument should be with parliament rather than KC.He was only following rules.
Who are always keen to help sex offenders and paedophiles.Yes, the law set by parliament in fact. It seems that the argument should be with parliament rather than KC.
I've written to Bill burns c/o the cia, George Bush center for intelligence, to ask if he could arrange a rendition for The NonceHe could hardly step into the shoes of the King if there was a chance of him facing arrest and extradition to the US.That would be nuts
If we think Peston's got it rightCan we just have a think about that. The spin was that Charles was one of the ones trying to get Andrew to step back from a “front line” role. Turns out not to have been true. Imagine.
Yes, the law set by parliament in fact. It seems that the argument should be with parliament rather than KC.
I've seen a lot of people say things along the lines of "I'd rather have Queen Elizabeth than a President Blair or Macron", seemingly oblivious to the fact we could easily have had a King Andrew.
Not that King Charles is, y'know, great...
For 12 months the UK did have a nazi (sympathiser) kingIf it weren't for that Simpson unit we'd have had a nazi king.
Can we just have a think about that. The spin was that Charles was one of the ones trying to get Andrew to step back from a “front line” role. Turns out not to have been true. Imagine.
In case people are missing it in the welter of royal threads, Charles has appointed Andrew as one of his “deputy kings” for when Charles is sick or out of the country. So there’s that.
No he won’t. Harry & his offspring are still ahead of Andy. You can’t resign from the line of succession.Now I'm sure I've mentioned it before, but if anything happens to William Wales before his firstborn is 21, then as soon as King Sausage Fingers succumbs to one of the health conditions he clearly has, Great Uncle Andrew will be Prince Regent.
No he won’t. Harry & his offspring are still ahead of Andy. You can’t resign from the line of succession.
He’s not got it wrong, but he may have the emphasis wrong, and in doing so missed the better story.If we think Peston's got it right
Preeeeeetty sure you can just say "no, thanks".No he won’t. Harry & his offspring are still ahead of Andy. You can’t resign from the line of succession.