I think Maitlis's interview with Andrew served to show clearly how out of touch he was. The excuses were pretty pathetic, pizza, sweating, honourable, ordinary shooting weekend. And he never once thought of the victims of Epstein although he had a chance at the end to empathise, he didn't realise or more likely hadn't thought of them. From his POV the interview was just me me me. And even though it was just me me he flunked it.
Please doKind of makes you stop and think about things.
The field I am in private school background doesn't count for squat. A man who went to the local comprehensive not far from where I initially grew up became a divisional director and later CEO. He had an accountancy background and probably an MBA from somewhere with a name.The higher you go the 'righter sort' you are gives you precedence. Hence mainly public school boys, or those nasty and venal enough to out-wanker them like Patel. Gives it 'the humble origins made good' veneer.
The field I am in private school background doesn't count for squat. A man who went to the local comprehensive not far from where I initially grew up became a divisional director and later CEO. He had an accountancy background and probably an MBA from somewhere with a name.
A legal name?The field I am in private school background doesn't count for squat. A man who went to the local comprehensive not far from where I initially grew up became a divisional director and later CEO. He had an accountancy background and probably an MBA from somewhere with a name.
Why not try it? The rest of us would find it a refreshing changeKind of makes you stop and think about things.
He does a quite good smarmy villain.
A key question, I feel.But can he not sweat?
It shows him clearly sweating.Newsnight photographer has 'shocking' picture of Prince Andrew
It is understood the Duke insisted the picture never become public, but Mark Harrison hinted that it may feature in a forthcoming film about how the BBC secured the interview.www.dailymail.co.uk
I wonder what it shows. Did he wank off a corgi? Pinch his mum's arse?
To titillate.If they darent publish it what’s the point in telling us about it?
To titillate.
Blackfaced, wearing a Jim’ll Fix It medal, dry humping Euginie while throwing a Nazi salute sweating profusely in a Pizza Express.
The photographer indicates it's about pushing the price up.If they darent publish it what’s the point in telling us about it?
The photographer indicates it's about pushing the price up.
The media group behind the Mail operates a massive picture library where even very lowly employees, if they know how, can navigate through virtual Raiders Of The Lost Ark epilogue warehouse-style repositories of well photos which have big boilerplate DO NOT PUBLISH WITHOUT EXPRESS PERMISSION OF SENIOR LEGAL TEAM notes on them.So they had a revealing pic and got the interview in exchange for an assurance to keep the pic in a safe. Haha!
I thought it just said photographer Mark Harrison worked on the interview and he had an incriminating photo. Maybe not a photo taken during that interview, but before times? Maybe him having the photo was what persuaded NoSweat to agree to the interview.It was taken in the course of filming the interview and "it will be so shocking, especially if it is decontextualised."
I guess he was trying to explain something, so it's probably him miming a sex act.