Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

The Judge now putting forward arguments in Giuffre's favour that weren't even advanced by her lawyers!

Will that be grounds for appeal?

He wants to be called HRH the Potential Defendant, Duke of York but I reckon he's already earned the title HRH The Disgraced Duke of York.
 
"Andrew B Brettler, the lawyer for the Duke of York, told Judge Lewis A Kaplan during a virtual hearing on Tuesday that a potential defendant was "someone who was not named as a defendant but could have been".

He said that a potential defendant would be someone Ms Giuffre knew that she had "claims against at the time that she filed the lawsuit" in 2009.
Judge Kaplan said "potential" was a phrase that neither he nor Mr Brettler could "find any meaning at all" in.

Mr Brettler told Judge Kaplan that Prince Andrew "could have been sued" but was not, and added that he wanted Ms Giuffre to "lock herself into a story now" and provide further and more precise details of her allegations.

Judge Kaplan responded to say that was not a requirement at this stage of the process and "just isn't the law".

Mr Brettler concluded by saying the case should "absolutely be dismissed"."
 
"Andrew B Brettler, the lawyer for the Duke of York, told Judge Lewis A Kaplan during a virtual hearing on Tuesday that a potential defendant was "someone who was not named as a defendant but could have been".

He said that a potential defendant would be someone Ms Giuffre knew that she had "claims against at the time that she filed the lawsuit" in 2009.
Judge Kaplan said "potential" was a phrase that neither he nor Mr Brettler could "find any meaning at all" in.

Mr Brettler told Judge Kaplan that Prince Andrew "could have been sued" but was not, and added that he wanted Ms Giuffre to "lock herself into a story now" and provide further and more precise details of her allegations.

Judge Kaplan responded to say that was not a requirement at this stage of the process and "just isn't the law".

Mr Brettler concluded by saying the case should "absolutely be dismissed"."
not really a ringing endorsement of the prince's innocence
 
"Andrew B Brettler, the lawyer for the Duke of York, told Judge Lewis A Kaplan during a virtual hearing on Tuesday that a potential defendant was "someone who was not named as a defendant but could have been".

He said that a potential defendant would be someone Ms Giuffre knew that she had "claims against at the time that she filed the lawsuit" in 2009.
Judge Kaplan said "potential" was a phrase that neither he nor Mr Brettler could "find any meaning at all" in.

Mr Brettler told Judge Kaplan that Prince Andrew "could have been sued" but was not, and added that he wanted Ms Giuffre to "lock herself into a story now" and provide further and more precise details of her allegations.

Judge Kaplan responded to say that was not a requirement at this stage of the process and "just isn't the law".

Mr Brettler concluded by saying the case should "absolutely be dismissed"."
All gone a bit Giuliani-esque.
 
Back
Top Bottom