Athos
Well-Known Member
He will be if he's listening to this.I'll bet he's sweating now.
He will be if he's listening to this.I'll bet he's sweating now.
The duke's aides are scouring Windsor for brown trousers and handkerchiefs as Andrew loses his coolHe will be if he's listening to this.
The Judge now putting forward arguments in Giuffre's favour that weren't even advanced by her lawyers!
Prince Charles has a servant to do this as he can't count beyond 1, his place in the list of succession to the throneProbably getting spankies from Lizzy bent over a stuffed corgi right now with Charles counting out the lashes.
"Fourteen Mommy, Fifteen mommy"
It's all falling apart for the (un)sweaty one
I don't think so; think he's allowed to interpret it.Will that be grounds for appeal?
He wants to be called HRH the Potential Defendant, Duke of York but I reckon he's already earned the title HRH The Disgraced Duke of York.
They could use his Latin name Rex DiaphoresisWill that be grounds for appeal?
He wants to be called HRH the Potential Defendant, Duke of York but I reckon he's already earned the title HRH The Disgraced Duke of York.
A miracle!Breaking news from the Duke's doctor: turns out his sweat glands are fully functional again.
Is that comedy or did they really?Breaking news from the Duke's doctor: turns out his sweat glands are fully functional again.
YesIs that comedy or did they really?
not really a ringing endorsement of the prince's innocence"Andrew B Brettler, the lawyer for the Duke of York, told Judge Lewis A Kaplan during a virtual hearing on Tuesday that a potential defendant was "someone who was not named as a defendant but could have been".
He said that a potential defendant would be someone Ms Giuffre knew that she had "claims against at the time that she filed the lawsuit" in 2009.
Judge Kaplan said "potential" was a phrase that neither he nor Mr Brettler could "find any meaning at all" in.
Mr Brettler told Judge Kaplan that Prince Andrew "could have been sued" but was not, and added that he wanted Ms Giuffre to "lock herself into a story now" and provide further and more precise details of her allegations.
Judge Kaplan responded to say that was not a requirement at this stage of the process and "just isn't the law".
Mr Brettler concluded by saying the case should "absolutely be dismissed"."
I would have thought so!Then if it works for Andrew the case should have been thrown out then
All gone a bit Giuliani-esque."Andrew B Brettler, the lawyer for the Duke of York, told Judge Lewis A Kaplan during a virtual hearing on Tuesday that a potential defendant was "someone who was not named as a defendant but could have been".
He said that a potential defendant would be someone Ms Giuffre knew that she had "claims against at the time that she filed the lawsuit" in 2009.
Judge Kaplan said "potential" was a phrase that neither he nor Mr Brettler could "find any meaning at all" in.
Mr Brettler told Judge Kaplan that Prince Andrew "could have been sued" but was not, and added that he wanted Ms Giuffre to "lock herself into a story now" and provide further and more precise details of her allegations.
Judge Kaplan responded to say that was not a requirement at this stage of the process and "just isn't the law".
Mr Brettler concluded by saying the case should "absolutely be dismissed"."
Is that comedy or did they really?
I'm going to try and get a tenner at 500/1 on him using a FOTL defence.Confess I haven't looked at Exhibit B yet but if the terms 'Ghislaine Maxwell' and 'Maxwell' are 'overbroad', what the hell is the term 'Other Potential Defendants'?