Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

No, she's asking for him to produce it and documents relating to it. Exhibit B is Windsor's lawyers' response to Giuffre's lawyers' request for pre-trial production of documents etc.
 
But if the process of getting it dismissed results in your reputation being destroyed, what have you actually achieved?
If your reputation has already been destroyed getting it dismissed would make life easier than going through the rigmarole of a full trial
 
so he's saying she's got his Spitting Image puppet?

sorry I'm a bit confused here
It was actually John Sessions doing his Prince Andrew impersonation that she met when she was with Epstein. He had worked on Spitting Image and so had access to the puppet.
 
I'm not still really following - so she wants it for dna evidence for example?

urggh sorry :(
Who knows? The relevant part of his objection (which is otherwise full of standard phrasing objections) says:

Defendant objects to this Request on the grounds that it is harassing and seeks confidential and private information and documents that are irrelevant, immaterial and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Defendant further objects to this Request on the grounds that it assumes facts not in evidence, including without limitation by perpetuating Plaintiff’s false claim that Defendant received a puppet as a gift from Epstein or Maxwell
 
ta that makes more sense

so objects to the request .... rather than just saying he hasn't got it :hmm:
Yes. That's pretty much his response to all the requests.

Other people can explain the procedure better than me (IANAL), but on the face of it he's being as unco-operative as possible.
 
Randy Andy as the newspapers here once called him regular was a very very good friend and visitor , user of Epsteins jet and holiday homes it seems for many years I find it hard to believe if hes guilty it was just with the 1 girl that kept a photo or somebody else released really there could be more at stake :hmm:
Yeah, I posted upthread that I wouldn't be surprised if girls/women weren't 'provided' in the gruesome circles he moved in.
 
Randy Andy as the newspapers here once called him regular was a very very good friend and visitor , user of Epsteins jet and holiday homes it seems for many years I find it hard to believe if hes guilty it was just with the 1 girl that kept a photo or somebody else released really there could be more at stake :hmm:
I read somewhere once that a lot of them were East European. So perhaps imported through gangs and therefore their silence assured.
 
So he's not even really bothering to deny this anymore, but relying on various legal loopholes? What an utter shit.
No, he'll deny everything if and when the time comes. He's just trying to get it thrown out on procedural grounds, first, so that he doesn't have to engage with the substance. As much as I hope he fails, that's probably the best strategy for him.
 
Will be expensive if not successful though, I presume the US has taxing of costs like the UK does?

Not that he doesn't have a bob or two.
 
Just to be absolutely fair and to give Randy Andy a fair crack of the whip (ouch) I’m going to ask a senior GP tomorrow at work if exposure to a stressful environment can lead to a change in the skin’s thermoregulation response. And when i get the response that that’s impossible i will report back. Regarding the answer we all know to be the case. Because proof is being required by the US legal system. If he gets away with this on the basis he can’t sweat…well should be interesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom