Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

It does surprise me somewhat, that people here are so trusting of the state and the ruling class. A lot of people refer to themselves as anarchists, but I really feel as though I'm exchanging with social democrats. The idea that Epstein was murdered is hardly outlandish, except for those who believe in the decency of the American judicial/political/social system.
 
Ok. It was Andrew supplied the rope.
This is the thing. It is of course possible that powerful people had Epstein killed, or even caused him to kill himself. It’s also plausible that he killed himself for his own reasons. I have no intention of trying to read up on it: if it’s the former, the powerful people won’t have left clues for random bloggers.

On balance, based on only a superficial reading, I think he probably killed himself. If it emerges that he didn’t, I won’t be particularly surprised, but it’s not something I think I need to build up any expertise on. Even if I could.
 
The idea that Epstein was murdered is hardly outlandish, except for those who believe in the decency of the American judicial/political/social system.
It’s not outlandish. But neither is it outlandish to think may have killed himself. It doesn’t follow that because you think a paedophile might have killed himself that you believe in the decency of the American judicial/political/social system. Indeed it’s something of a failing of that very system if he was able to.
 
Disingenuous post. Very different circumstances. And you know it
The first inquest into Calvi's death concluded that it was suicide. There was a second inquest a year later that gave an open verdict. A second autopsy held a decade after his death declared that Calvi's injuries were inconsistent with suicide; a second autopsy on Epstein came to the same conclusion. One of the theories about Calvi was that his death was suicide made to look like murder. Calvi was in trouble facing prison and the concomitant loss of income. He was however heavily insured with a policy that would cushion his family's loss of income. Killing yourself in a way that looked like a ritualistic Masonic murder would ensure that the brokers paid out.

Hence my comment which you seemed to disagree with.

Yes, suicide cunningly disguised to look like murder.

Both deaths in their own way were very odd. Why should we accept that one is the consequence of a labyrinthine conspiracy and not the other?
 
It does surprise me somewhat, that people here are so trusting of the state and the ruling class. A lot of people refer to themselves as anarchists, but I really feel as though I'm exchanging with social democrats. The idea that Epstein was murdered is hardly outlandish, except for those who believe in the decency of the American judicial/political/social system.
I and I suspect most people on this thread will be fully on board with the idea the American and British police routinely kill working class people people inside and outside of cells. In terms of them killing epstein, it's more a question of why would they? Yes, some industrialists/bankers/actors and the rest would have been shitting themselves about what he might say at some stage. But that doesn't add up to the American state and/or New York authorities taking the immense risk of launching a conspiracy, one which if it was ever uncovered would see them facing jail time. There's also the number of people any such conspiracy would need to be on board and consequent risk of detection, the thing going wrong and the body having obvious signs of murder etc etc. And why would the authorities go to all that trouble to save Prince Noncey, Dershovitz or at best, Clinton? The simplest explanation, Occcam's Razor and all that.
 
I don't think Epstein being murdered can be definitely ruled out. But I haven't seen anything to indicate that any of the supposedly suspicious circumstances can't reasonably be called consistent with suicide.

For example, even if the apparent laxness in prison security were down to people being paid off (rather than it just being generally rubbish), surely it could easily be that it was Epstein who paid people off.
 
It does surprise me somewhat, that people here are so trusting of the state and the ruling class. A lot of people refer to themselves as anarchists, but I really feel as though I'm exchanging with social democrats. The idea that Epstein was murdered is hardly outlandish, except for those who believe in the decency of the American judicial/political/social system.
I don't know 100% whether he killed himself or was murdered. I'm inclined to think suicide. If I actually gave a shit, then I'd be inclined to ask a bookie for a price on it eventually turning out he was in fact murdered. As I've got a sneaking feeling the odds for that would be astronomical, it might be worth a punt.
 
I don't know 100% whether he killed himself or was murdered. I'm inclined to think suicide. If I actually gave a shit, then I'd be inclined to ask a bookie for a price on it eventually turning out he was in fact murdered. As I've got a sneaking feeling the odds for that would be astronomical, it might be worth a punt.
Problem is chances he didn't kill himself ≠ chances we will one day know about it.
 
I and I suspect most people on this thread will be fully on board with the idea the American and British police routinely kill working class people people inside and outside of cells. In terms of them killing epstein, it's more a question of why would they? Yes, some industrialists/bankers/actors and the rest would have been shitting themselves about what he might say at some stage. But that doesn't add up to the American state and/or New York authorities taking the immense risk of launching a conspiracy, one which if it was ever uncovered would see them facing jail time. There's also the number of people any such conspiracy would need to be on board and consequent risk of detection, the thing going wrong and the body having obvious signs of murder etc etc. And why would the authorities go to all that trouble to save Prince Noncey, Dershovitz or at best, Clinton? The simplest explanation, Occcam's Razor and all that.
 
It does surprise me somewhat, that people here are so trusting of the state and the ruling class. A lot of people refer to themselves as anarchists, but I really feel as though I'm exchanging with social democrats.
Not sure that anarchists leap to wild claims if there's a possibility it might involve a state. Fascists are more likely to or green party loons.
 
Back
Top Bottom