Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

Wikipedia was not my source ..

Their own historic site was.

That's still very light on detail. Point being they weren't "taken over" and most of the world was being claimed at that point by the Brits, French, Portugese, Dutch, Spanish, etc. It's not about whether that was good or bad but rather whether Argentina (a nation that didn't exist when they were first settled, and itself built on conquest and genocide) had/has a greater claim over them then the Brits or French.
 
Last edited:
When will people accept that the British Empire was a land grabbing shower of cunts?
That's still very light on detail. Point being they weren't "taken over" and most of the world was being claimed at that point by the Brits, French, Portugese, Dutch, Spanish, etc. It's not about whether that was good or bad but rather whether Argentina (a nation that didn't exist when they were first settled) had/has a greater claim over them then the Brits or French.


There actually were Spanish speaking people on the Falklands in the 16tg and 17th century who had been living there. They were from "Argentina"
They were "moved"... as is always the case when Empires invade.

Typically it was the British empire taking over an island for purely strategic military reasons ...
It's typical of the British Empire. Sure.
They were miserable cunts.
The fact that some people living there are British doesn't take from the fact that the island was basically comandeered by the Brits and ..the Spanish and French. And the Brits kicked the French and Spanish out.

The islands are linked to issues related to Antarctica. So its really strategic for the British who will probably never give it back to Argentina.
 
When will people accept that the British Empire was a land grabbing shower of cunts?



There actually were Spanish speaking people on the Falklands in the 16tg and 17th century who had been living there. They were from "Argentina"
They were "moved"... as is always the case when Empires invade.

Typically it was the British empire taking over an island for purely strategic military reasons ...
It's typical of the British Empire. Sure.
They were miserable cunts.
The fact that some people living there are British doesn't take from the fact that the island was basically comandeered by the Brits and ..the Spanish and French. And the Brits kicked the French and Spanish out.

The islands are linked to issues related to Antarctica. So its really strategic for the British who will probably never give it back to Argentina.

This is also inaccurate.
 
Yep. Condemn the kids who went to fight the invaders, not the dictator who caused the invasion. Twit.
If you think not being OK with shooting teenage conscripts is the same as praising the dictator in the country they hail from then surely your logic would be considered regressive by the standards of many English conscripts back in 1914.
 
When will people accept that the British Empire was a land grabbing shower of cunts?



There actually were Spanish speaking people on the Falklands in the 16tg and 17th century who had been living there. They were from "Argentina"
They were "moved"... as is always the case when Empires invade.

Typically it was the British empire taking over an island for purely strategic military reasons ...
It's typical of the British Empire. Sure.
They were miserable cunts.
The fact that some people living there are British doesn't take from the fact that the island was basically comandeered by the Brits and ..the Spanish and French. And the Brits kicked the French and Spanish out.

The islands are linked to issues related to Antarctica. So its really strategic for the British who will probably never give it back to Argentina.
A lot of people accept that the British Empire was tyranny in action. But I can't change that. I can be appalled by it, but I can't change history.

The British did a lot of damage to Ireland.
 
If you think not being OK with shooting teenage conscripts is the same as praising the dictator in the country they hail from then surely your logic would be considered regressive by the standards of many English conscripts back in 1914.
I'll try again Spy. You called the conscripts "invaders" but surely this isn't the case, they are conscripts. Fighting a war they didn't choose to be involved in.


The rest of my paragraph re 1914 obvs remains the same.
 
I'll try again Spy. You called the conscripts "invaders" but surely this isn't the case, they are conscripts. Fighting a war they didn't choose to be involved in.
So do you'd sooner blame the defending/liberating forces for their deaths than the fascist regime that sent them there for their own political aims in the first place? Is that wise?
 
So do you'd sooner blame the defending/liberating forces for their deaths than the fascist regime that sent them there for their own political aims in the first place? Is that wise?
i'm blaming thatcher for sending them there in the first place just to boost her popularity
 
I genuinely thought he was referring to Thatcher, not Galtieri


The irony of your position is that had you lived under Galtieri’s regime you would have been in the first cohort to show off your high diving skills in to the River Plate.

By all means slag off Thatcher but don’t do it at the expense of sparing murderous cunt dictators.
 
tbh, it wasn't just for that; it was also to make good for the tory diplomatic failure that precipitated the Argentinian invasion. As the tories tend to do, they turned a threat into an 'opportunity'.
The diplomatic failings went back through successive governments, probably into the 50s.
 
Back
Top Bottom