Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

Even if he does actually turn up for the deposition, chances are he won't answer any questions. Can he plead the 5th if it's a civil case?
 
And the grouse season is pretty much over, I think.
Dahling! We're barely halfway through, August 12th to December 10th. Pheasants will take us through till the end of January when the poor chap will only have Red Deer to hunt until April. Finally he can then have a couple of months off (well, unless he has a fancy for a young muntjac or two), until the Red Stag season starts up in Scotland in July.
 
epstein-prince-andrew.gif
 
Plenty of time to get the servants drilled and statements agreed on.
'Oh yes, your honour, my prince definitely likes pizza... and driving to places where pizza can be found... in secret... and keeping that drive off the royal protection logs. And on days when he does that, he finds little time for nightclub visits much later in the day'.
 
The Royal protection officers he has now are not likely to be the same ones he had 20 years ago which means that Giuffre's lawyers will have to pay someone to track them down and they might very well just refuse to co-operate, doubt they could be forced to. As for whatever logs that might exist (if they still do) then assuming the Met hands them over what are they likely to say?
'11:10 PC Bloggs and I sat in the car and had our sandwiches while HRH went upstairs and got his leg over with the teenage girl that the creepy Yank set him up with'
Lots of people (Inc me) are getting their hopes up there will be some big reveal that will show him up for what he is but it seems to be that everything is just going to be endless insinuation.
 
The Royal protection officers he has now are not likely to be the same ones he had 20 years ago which means that Giuffre's lawyers will have to pay someone to track them down and they might very well just refuse to co-operate, doubt they could be forced to. As for whatever logs that might exist (if they still do) then assuming the Met hands them over what are they likely to say?
'11:10 PC Bloggs and I sat in the car and had our sandwiches while HRH went upstairs and got his leg over with the teenage girl that the creepy Yank set him up with'
Lots of people (Inc me) are getting their hopes up there will be some big reveal that will show him up for what he is but it seems to be that everything is just going to be endless insinuation.
I doubt they'd still have them (why would they?), but, even if they did, I doubt they'd be provided (by fair means or foul), and, even if they were, what would they show that would be killer evidence? Even if he wasn't at Pizza Express and was at Maxwell's house, it'd be far short of the evidence required.
 
The Royal protection officers he has now are not likely to be the same ones he had 20 years ago which means that Giuffre's lawyers will have to pay someone to track them down and they might very well just refuse to co-operate, doubt they could be forced to. As for whatever logs that might exist (if they still do) then assuming the Met hands them over what are they likely to say?
'11:10 PC Bloggs and I sat in the car and had our sandwiches while HRH went upstairs and got his leg over with the teenage girl that the creepy Yank set him up with'
Lots of people (Inc me) are getting their hopes up there will be some big reveal that will show him up for what he is but it seems to be that everything is just going to be endless insinuation.
ONe particular protection officer broke cover a couple of years ago and called for the logs, iirc. Don't remember it going anywhere.
 
I doubt they'd still have them (why would they?), but, even if they did, I doubt they'd be provided (by fair means or foul), and, even if they were, what would they show that would be killer evidence - even if he wasn't at Pizza Express and was at Maxwell's house, it'd be far short of the evidence required.
Given that they, kind of, record the movements and doings of the royals, my pure guess is that they are kept in some filing cabinet somewhere. However, as you say they wouldn't add up to killer evidence on her side, just potential proof that he was lying or had 'misremembered' the events of that day. Put the other way round though, if he was telling the truth, at least about the pizza express visit, you'd think he'd be calling for the logs to back up that bit of his story. I think it's a fair guess his lawyers will have talked to the met or whoever runs the royal protection lot to see what records exist. They'll be confident the met are planning to keep out of this.
 
Given that they, kind of, record the movements and doings of the royals, my pure guess is that they are kept in some filing cabinet somewhere. However, as you say they wouldn't add up to killer evidence on her side, just potential proof that he was lying or had 'misremembered' the events of that day. Put the other way round though, if he was telling the truth, at least about the pizza express visit, you'd think he'd be calling for the logs to back up that bit of his story. I think it's a fair guess his lawyers will have talked to the met or whoever runs the royal protection lot to see what records exist. They'll be confident the met are planning to keep out of this.
Yeah, can't imagine him proffering that alibi if there was a chance of contemporaneous documents proving it to be false.
 
I doubt they'd still have them (why would they?), but, even if they did, I doubt they'd be provided (by fair means or foul), and, even if they were, what would they show that would be killer evidence? Even if he wasn't at Pizza Express and was at Maxwell's house,it'd be far short of the evidence required.

Required to secure a prosecution in court.

In the court of public opinion though the jury is majority against him and as his worming continues it creeps towards a unanimous verdict. Seeing as the whole sorry house of cards comes tumbling down once the lickspittles and brown-nosers withdraw their support I am wholly in favour of the current state of play.
 
Required to secure a prosecution in court.

In the court of public opinion though the jury is majority against him and as his worming continues it creeps towards a majority verdict. Seeing as the whole sorry house of cards comes tumbling down once the lickspittles and brown-nosers withdraw their support I am wholly in favour of the current state of play.
all that is needed to hasten the wretched man's demise is to install ole gunnar solskjaer in a management role within his entourage, if the cabal of panders and pimps i believe congregate about him can be described as an entourage
 
Back
Top Bottom