No. NORTH KOREA at the state funeral.At the Ayatollah's funeral? I doubt it.
You stated as fact something that is utter bullishit.
No. NORTH KOREA at the state funeral.
Obviously.
What sly misrepresentation. You disingenuous cunt.
You stated as fact something that is utter bullishit. A false statement that damages the credibility of genuine arguments. And you've not even got the self-respect to simply hold your hands up to it, you have to drag it out into this instead.
Go on, send out another mass mailing accusing people of harassment.
Because I wasn't responding to your post.I posted a youtube clip of the Ayatollah's funeral in Iran and said the people there looked really grief-stricken. Don't know why you're bringing up North Korea in reply to that.
Because it's been reported as being untrue in several reputable sources, for example:How can you know of a certainty that it's bullshit?
A report in a Chinese newspaper subsequently claimed that Jang had been fed to 120 hungry dogs. But, as many people suspected, that's probably not true.
In a rare interview with Sky News, North Korea's ambassador to the U.K. Hyun Hak-bong said that Jang was put on trial and confessed to what he did wrong.
"According to the laws by the criminal court he was sentenced to death. Well he was shot to death," Hyun said.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/kim-...d-to-a-pack-of-wild-dogs-2014-1#ixzz30gMhg4FU
Because it's been reported as being untrue in several reputable sources, for example:
http://www.businessinsider.com/kim-jong-uns-uncle-was-shot-not-fed-to-a-pack-of-wild-dogs-2014-1#!HNZcC
But, as many people suspected, that's probably not true.
How can we know anything we are not actually present for is true?The question was, how can anyone here know for a certainty that it isn't true?
How can we know anything we are not actually present for is true?
All of those can be tampered with. Eyewitness testimony has been shown to be not necessarily correct.Photos, video, recording of whatever type. Eyewitness testimony from trusted sources.
The ex ambassador from North Korea isn't someone whose veracity I'm familiar with.
All of those can be tampered with. Eyewitness testimony has been shown to be not necessarily correct.
Anyway, I'd rather talk about Peaches on this thread. Start a new thread if you want to talk about the veracity of reports coming from Communist regimes.
Being hung drawn and quartered is part of the English language. But that doesn't meant that anybody does it anymore.The thing is that "execution by dog" is something that is part of NK criminal justice. It's in their language. Quan jue...Also they have a habit of not telling the rest of the world about the atrocities that are committed there. The NK ambassador to the UK denies the use of this method of execution .....so it must be true .....and even if it is true that the man was not eaten by dogs I think that you Corax have a most disagreeable way of posting and a tendancy to be quite nasty.
Every person agrees that NK has a horrifying human rights history. They deny that there are concentration camps there. They deny mass graves full of NK people who dared to question anything. They force people to mourn...... who knows what else they do?
Given her family history do you think it was a purposeful OD or an accidental one? I'm of the opinion it was the latter - an accident.Comments have been made about what sort of mother she was. Hard for any of us to know a lot about that. All I can go by are the photos of her talking on her cel as her baby is lying in the street; and the fact that she od-ed with a child at her side.
Britney Spears was photographed once with her child strapped into the same seatbelt with her. The press and the public went mad with calling her a bad mother.
Funny how the press coddles some celebrities, and crucifies others.
Being hung drawn and quartered is part of the English language. But that doesn't meant that anybody does it anymore.
Corax isn't a nasty poster, as you would see of you read many of his posts. What he does is disagree with you and with respect, you don't seem to accept that you can possibly be disagreed with in anything you say.
Anyway, as I said to Johnny, I'd rather talk about Peaches on this thread.
Gotta be said I agree with you there our kid.Comments have been made about what sort of mother she was. Hard for any of us to know a lot about that. All I can go by are the photos of her talking on her cel as her baby is lying in the street; and the fact that she od-ed with a child at her side.
Britney Spears was photographed once with her child strapped into the same seatbelt with her. The press and the public went mad with calling her a bad mother.
Funny how the press coddles some celebrities, and crucifies others.
Given her family history do you think it was a purposeful OD or an accidental one? I'm of the opinion it was the latter - an accident.
And that's not judgemental at all.I really have no clue.
Whichever it was, she purposefully did heroin - with young child at her side.
Given her family history do you think it was a purposeful OD or an accidental one? I'm of the opinion it was the latter - an accident.
And that's not judgemental at all.
And that's not judgemental at all.