Jonathan Freedland in the Guardian doing the centrist dipshit thing of what sounds like a reasonable headline but then managed to avoid the finer detail in the Falter situation, like the whole further video which shows him to be an outright liar, while implying he may have a point so offering him cover.
Was Britain’s Jewish community grateful for this contribution from Falter? Some were, but others were troubled by his insistence that he had merely been out and about on a Saturday, minding his own business, when he happened to stumble across the Gaza demo, rather than admitting that he had deliberately set out to make a (perhaps legitimate) point. That lack of honesty was damaging because it played directly into the hands of antisemites who say Jews cannot be trusted to tell the truth about antisemitism.
...and takes a massive swing at Naomi Klein by not accurately saying what she said and offering her absolutely no cover, despite there being no lying involved in Klein's statement as published. Professional jealousy from Freedland here?
And that feeling is not reduced when they hear a big-name speaker suggest to a New York crowd that any Jew who believes, after two millennia of persecution, that Jews need a home of their own is a worshipper of a false, profane god.
Both sides are beset by those who think their words and deeds bring peace closer. Instead they make a better future harder to attain, says Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland
www.theguardian.com
Someone elsewhere noted that Falter and the CAA have, for the first time, experienced pushback on their right wing activities because they decided to try and take on the Met Commissioner and the Cop, and bounce the Tories into doing what they want.
It was absolutely fine for them to doggedly go after Labour and get all the completely unexamined media time in that regard, but this time they've stepped out of line and now reports about the antisemitism czsar warned against Falter advising the extremism taskforce, and reports on his links with Israeli illegal settlements are suddenly
able to be reported upon as journalists find that what wasn't relevant before is now extremely relevant.
Campaign Against Antisemitism, led by Gideon Falter, cites safety fears and promises more protests to come
www.theguardian.com
I also see Falter and the CAA have cancelled their protest due to safety concerns but still purporting that their plan to walk alongside the pro-Palestine march was actually an innocent act - rather than just scaling up Falters provocation.
Not that they'd have got "thousands", but given their previous marches took place on alternate days or in entirely separate locations - this deliberate choice to attempt to hold a march not just simultaneously, but in the same location with the intent of following the other one should be getting a lot more criticism than it is.
As folks have said, the cops never allow football fans from opposing teams to do that, or anti fash and fash to hold sidebyside marches. Why on earth did the CAA think they could do this? Because they're used to getting what they want and they're mad as hell the establishment gave them even the mildest slap on the wrists for fucking with the cops.