ska invita
back on the other side
Excellent bit of reporting here, too much to summarise
NATO's bombing/de facto regime change of Libya was such an utter disaster on so many levels, and got near zero blowback or even signs of awareness from within NATO country populations. A great example of how our own states get away with war crimes under our very noses. Makes me furious...just endless destruction, destablisation and deathSome context on how jihadists get their arms and how big an effect the regime change in Libya had on the Sahel
Arms trafficking from Libya to Niger is back in business | ISS Africa
Countries in West Africa need to collaborate to stem the tide of weapons flowing through Niger.issafrica.org
NATO's bombing/de facto regime change of Libya was such an utter disaster on so many levels, and got near zero blowback or even signs of awareness from within NATO country populations. A great example of how our own states get away with war crimes under our very noses. Makes me furious...just endless destruction, destablisation and death
this summarises my opinion on it,You do know there was a civil war in Libya and attempts to get rid of Gaddafi well before any of the NATO bombing? And the bombing was UNSC backed to try and prevent further civilian deaths?
Not unproblematic but the way some people seem to portray it is that was Libya was all fine until NATO intervened and that caused the chaos.
Hmm, the second line is a smokescreen in that if Gadaffi had been selling oil to France at discount rate and wasn't causing any strategic bother to NATO countries they would have turned a blind eye if not helped quash the rebels.this summarises my opinion on it,
If there were global justice, Nato would be in the dock | Seumas Milne
Seumas Milne: Liberia's Charles Taylor has been convicted of war crimes, so why not the western leaders who escalated Libya's killing?www.theguardian.com
including
"But while Nato's UN mandate was to protect civilians, the alliance in practice turned that mission on its head. Throwing its weight behind one side in a civil war to oust Gaddafi's regime, it became the air force for the rebel militias on the ground. So while the death toll was perhaps between 1,000 and 2,000 when Nato intervened in March, by October it was estimated by the NTC to be 30,000 – including thousands of civilians.
We can't of course know what would have happened without Nato's bombing campaign, even if there is no evidence that Gaddafi had either the intention or capability to carry out a massacre in Benghazi. But we do know that Nato provided decisive air cover for the rebels as they matched Gaddafi's forces war crime for war crime, carried out massacres of their own and indiscriminately shelled civilian areas with devastating results – such as reduced much of Sirte to rubble last October."
*i take your point LDC in the second line
this summarises my opinion on it,
If there were global justice, Nato would be in the dock | Seumas Milne
Seumas Milne: Liberia's Charles Taylor has been convicted of war crimes, so why not the western leaders who escalated Libya's killing?www.theguardian.com
including
"But while Nato's UN mandate was to protect civilians, the alliance in practice turned that mission on its head. Throwing its weight behind one side in a civil war to oust Gaddafi's regime, it became the air force for the rebel militias on the ground. So while the death toll was perhaps between 1,000 and 2,000 when Nato intervened in March, by October it was estimated by the NTC to be 30,000 – including thousands of civilians.
We can't of course know what would have happened without Nato's bombing campaign, even if there is no evidence that Gaddafi had either the intention or capability to carry out a massacre in Benghazi. But we do know that Nato provided decisive air cover for the rebels as they matched Gaddafi's forces war crime for war crime, carried out massacres of their own and indiscriminately shelled civilian areas with devastating results – such as reduced much of Sirte to rubble last October."
*i take your point LDC in the second line
Wagner has partnered with African nations including Mali and Central African Republic, leading to wide accusations of abuses by rights groups and western governments.I think what happened and what continues to happen in Niger was not instigated by Russia or by Wagner.
But to the extent that they try to take advantage of it – and we see a repeat of what’s happened in other countries, where they’ve brought nothing but bad things in their wake – that wouldn’t be good.
Every single place that this group, Wagner group, has gone, death, destruction and exploitation have followed.
Not fussed, it's correctSeumas Milne though, the horrible cunt?
Yes, to repeat more or less what I said a few posts above, everybody and their dog is perfectly well aware of western, often US imperialism but it does not make what Binken says here, untrue....'Every single place that this group, Wagner group, has gone, death, destruction and exploitation have followed.' And this is said with a straight face by a leading member of a US administration.
Indeed, but I'm known on here for my whataboutery.Yes, to repeat more or less what I said a few posts above, everybody and their dog is perfectly well aware of western, often US imperialism but it does not make what Binken says here, untrue.
ECOWAS Military overthrow of the coup far from certain:
"Despite the strong language, a number of key countries that have said they would supply forces are facing domestic political pushback over the proposed intervention, including Nigeria and Ghana.
Nigeria’s senate has expressed objections, while opposition parties in Ghana have questioned the legal basis for an intervention under the country’s constitution.
Another stumbling block is the African Union. The AU’s peace and security council met in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, on Monday for talks on the crisis in Niger. There were reports that a reportedly “difficult” meeting had rejected the proposed Ecowas intervention, with southern and northern African countries said to be “fiercely against any military intervention”, according to a diplomat who spoke to French media.
While Ecowas in theory does not require the AU’s approval, historically it has often moved in step with the AU.
The US Department of State has also indicated that it would prefer the crisis to be resolved peacefully if possible, lol"
If only Niger was like France
"The problem of Nigeriens today is putschists who are putting them in danger, because they are abandoning the fight against terrorism, because they are abandoning a policy which was economically good for them, and because they are losing all the international funding that was enabling them to get out of poverty”.• “Our policy is simple: we do not recognize the putschists, we support a president who has not resigned”.• “We support the diplomatic action, and when it decides, the military of ECOWAS”. #Niger #NigerCoup #NigerCrisis"
Niger or Gabon? The latter is unclear but Niger is at least ant-French if not completely ant-imperialist (the US still has a base there and interestingly is one of the few global north nations not to call this a coup yet). Don't forget the "democratically-elected" Bazoum invited in the French army that got displaced by the Mali takeover. There also seems to be some unity between the three Sahel states with some Sankara-esque rhetoric coming out of B-F in particular.Im still not clear to what extent this coup was an anti-imperialist one, and how much of that is used as justification for a more personalised power struggle
Naked imperialism here from Macron:
I read somewhere the other day that there was an investigation into huge corruption in some military contract in Niger, and that those generals involved carried out the coup to avoid being held to account for it. Might be bullshit.Im still not clear to what extent this coup was an anti-imperialist one, and how much of that is used as justification for a more personalised power struggle
Exactly. See Gabon thread as well.Democratic/decolonisation movements tend not to be lead by the military establishment of the ‘liberated’ nation, just someone else grabbing the power.