Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Motherhood and the denial of the mother

And it was normal in a lot of cultures for the longest time and they didn't
Europeans had wet nurses in the 19th century, Chinese and Indians too
Probably other less celebrated cultures
Babies as the centre of your life are a consumer fetish like marriage

No it was not normal to remove a baby and give it to complete strangers.
There was a tradition of children going to live with grandparents or elderly family but that is not the same.

As for marriage? Who gives a fuck about that nowadays? And nobody here is saying babies are the bee all and end all??? Are they?
 
And it was normal in a lot of cultures for the longest time and they didn't
Europeans had wet nurses in the 19th century, Chinese and Indians too
Probably other less celebrated cultures
Babies as the centre of your life are a consumer fetish like marriage
And do you think these wet nurses were paid? Enough? Could the average salary pay for a wet nurse and would there be anything left to live on? Was there a massive divide between rich and poor that made wet nurses possible? Did poor people have wet nurses? Because I don't think most of us could afford a wet nurse and I'm not sure which reality you're living in.
 
I made fun of the level of discussion.

I posted a true thought that bugs me a lot, how we are just essentially cattle or germs or whatever, and the idea of motherhood is a fiction
It's possible to make a baby without a woman. Or if I am wrong about that you can definitely just get the baby once it's out and it won't know any difference.
Either you stop acting like a fucking idiot now or you're off this site for good. Again.
 
It's a shame.

There's a lot of interesting stuff to be said about The Mother and The Daughter as political entities.

This thread could have been good.


Rules :

1) Don't post when drunk
2) Be charitable in interpretation.
3)?
4) profit?
 
To clarify a bit more on my OP... I posted late last night/this morning in a flushed rush and then "had" to go to bed...

Luce Irigara writes much on the relationship of women, especially mothers and quite specifically at times about mothers and daughters. I would not recommend reading her as for want of a better word (but my brain is still unfocussed) it's pretty turgid stuff. You can read and reread and still not be quite sure what she is actually saying. Interestingly as a person she comes across as extremely unmaternal and almost misogynistic. Don't tell her I said that. Although she has said worse to me.

If you give her a google there are some great explanatory essays that are much nicer to read.

Does being not maternal discredit a women from being a feminist?

Luce Iragaray is an important feminist writer.
 
Did poor people have wet nurses?

I don't suppose they had paid ones. I'm guessing that wet-nursing was mostly only monetarised between rich and poor. But outside the aristocracy if there were family members or friends whose babies had died, which is very likely given infant mortality, I dont know that breast-feeding as an act was such a bond between only one person and another. And there was a bond of a different kind:

Milk kinship - Wikipedia

It's not a great article.
 
BBC Radio 4 - An Alternative History of Mothering

Listened to this "Alternative History of Motherhood" by social historian Emma Griffin

What she is arguing is that Motherhood has a history. It changes over time. She wants to "debunk the motherhood myth". That motherhood is natural and biological. Its socially constructed and at end of the programme she sees this as positive. As people ( women. All the contributors to programme are women. Mainly historians) can decide for themselves what motherhood means. Programme isn't denying motherhood its saying it's subject to change over time. That what motherhood means. What in fact bringing up children means is capable of change.

I got from this fascinating programme that there is a lot of research by social historians ( nearly all women) on the history of motherhood.

The programme goes from early modern England to present day.

In early modern period childrearing was about bringing up children in the same way as looking after livestock. Men and Women were based around home and work so childrearing was more shared.

It wasn't until 18c that " Cult of maternity" started. Which is more recognisable to present day.

This cult of maternity was for elite women. Working class women and slaves were liable to lose their children.

Through to the 20c when after two world are women were expected to return to the home and motherhood. The cult of motherhood was re inforced by new pyschological ideas like "attachment theory". Which stressed importance of bonding of mothers and children to childs development.

So motherhood isn't defined by biology or supposed natural instincts. Its socially and historically constructed. Class and race are also important in this history. It changes over time.
 
Last edited:
I guess by looking at traditional societies we might learn more about how the template has diverged later.

I have Jared Diamond’s most recent book in the queue but haven’t got to it yet.

I don’t think natural instincts can be completely separated from the picture. I think the picture is likely to be complex, though. Friends of mine have described the intensity of feeling and complete reframing of perspective that has happened after giving birth, and some of that has the flavour of something locked deeply into our being.
 
Does being not maternal discredit a women from being a feminist?

Luce Iragaray is an important feminist writer.
No there are lots of feminist philosphers who have decided motherhood was not for them.

Yes Luce is important but hard going.

Maternal feminism seems quite reductive in our current era. I liked your other post and cannot believe how much good stuff I am missing on radio 4 at the moment. Will try and catch up later. I was up at 4 a.m. today to travel to a client's and am a bit tired already.


Because of this thread I have been thinking a great deal about my own relationship with my mother. I do not remember much from my early childhood except knowing my mother trusted me implicitly to tell her the truth about how she looked. It mattered a lot to her that she looked her best when going out. My mid childhood was full of family problems that did not resolve themselves until I was around 16. I very much took on the maternal role with my siblings whilst my parents fought their battles. When the house was calm again (and full of fun) my mother and I once again became extremely close with me being able to confide in her and feel that I was always getting an honest answer. We were still close when I was away studying and later when travelling.

Then I reached the age she was when she married and started making babies and something changed. She could no longer relate to my lifestyle even though she had encouraged me to be independent and chase my dreams. She had not done that and I think it was hard for both of us to acknowledge I had now grown up and we didn't have that much in common anymore.

Once I became a mother things returned once again to what might be our natural state of closeness. I am not sure. There was something lost in those middle years or perhaps it was something gained. I am still trying to work it out.

I feel like we are now entering the final phase in our relationship. Her visits to specialists are becoming more frequent and I expect to soon be caring for her in a new maternal role.
 
No there are lots of feminist philosphers who have decided motherhood was not for them.

Yes Luce is important but hard going.

Maternal feminism seems quite reductive in our current era. I liked your other post and cannot believe how much good stuff I am missing on radio 4 at the moment. Will try and catch up later. I was up at 4 a.m. today to travel to a client's and am a bit tired already.


Because of this thread I have been thinking a great deal about my own relationship with my mother. I do not remember much from my early childhood except knowing my mother trusted me implicitly to tell her the truth about how she looked. It mattered a lot to her that she looked her best when going out. My mid childhood was full of family problems that did not resolve themselves until I was around 16. I very much took on the maternal role with my siblings whilst my parents fought their battles. When the house was calm again (and full of fun) my mother and I once again became extremely close with me being able to confide in her and feel that I was always getting an honest answer. We were still close when I was away studying and later when travelling.

Then I reached the age she was when she married and started making babies and something changed. She could no longer relate to my lifestyle even though she had encouraged me to be independent and chase my dreams. She had not done that and I think it was hard for both of us to acknowledge I had now grown up and we didn't have that much in common anymore.

Once I became a mother things returned once again to what might be our natural state of closeness. I am not sure. There was something lost in those middle years or perhaps it was something gained. I am still trying to work it out.

I feel like we are now entering the final phase in our relationship. Her visits to specialists are becoming more frequent and I expect to soon be caring for her in a new maternal role.

Thanks for liking my post on the history programme.

I've looked up the historian today and she has a website with links to other work she has done.

Emma Griffin ~ Historian & Author

She is done work on the industrial Revolution. Including a lot on women in that period. I will check it out.

Work of historians like her is important as something like industrial Revolution is mainly seen in terms of the worker. Who is assumed as male.

On personal history. I don't have sisters. My female friends have mixture of realtionships with mothers.

Some good some not.

If I get your OP right you aren't only talking about personal relationships but how mothers are seen symbolically? Which is fair point to make. Early childhood ( and this is specific to our society) mothers did early nurturing then the Father role became more important later as children started to move towards becoming more adult. Move into society. Thus the maternal role gets devalued symbolically? Or am I getting the wrong end of the stick?

So for the mother/ daughter relationship this became problematic.

Sounds like in your family history you early on took on the maternal role in your family.

I think for people of my generation my parents grew up during and post war to live in society structured around specific roles for parents. To try and go against the social structures in which one was brought up in one's own personal relationships isn't something that might work out. Whilst family life is socially and historically constructed it acts something that is natural.

The way I deal with it is looking at how social structures constrain people. Why I liked that history programme. My own family was a failure. Despite my parents intentions. They didn't manage to overcome the social structure they had to live in.

After years of not having anything to do with my family I recently had contact with my brother. We pretty well agreed on why our family history. We get on fine. I never fell out with him. It was my family.

Unlike me he has children. They are doing ok. As he said to me he wanted his children to have a start in life that we didn't.

Interestingly my brother now works in social services running parenting course for families.

Anyway I'm not going to say more on this thread on my personal history. Its not all that relevant to the OP.

As you bravely shared some of yours thought I should say some of where I come from.
 
Last edited:
I really enjoyed the programme and thank you for linking to her website. I will enjoy reading more of her work. History is so very important and sometimes I forget that history informs philosophy as much if not more than vice versa. I will be recommending it to some friends on other platforms.

So many interesting points were made that point to how women have been idealised as the primary care giver. I can see more clearly how history has shaped and perhaps informs how we in today's society want to raise children. I often think I raise my children as if they are farm animals. From us all sleeping in one room at points to my being accused of a too free range approach.

The juxtaposition of the elite women made into a maddonna figure with little information on the poor and non-white mothers except to say those often had their babies ripped from their arms in colonialist society. There appeared to be mother shaming as soon as the idol was created but not much was spoken of (ok it was only 30 min show) the women who probably did most of the care of the children.

As for getting personal, thank you for sharing back. I am aware that I didn't provide opportunity when I joined the boards to tell people as much about me as I probably should have. The bad timing of a project taking off much quicker than I anticipated and keeping me away from chatting on forums.
 
Back
Top Bottom