London_Calling
Pleasant and unpatronising
Are you serious? She was there at the start, at junior 'journalist' level - there is nothing she doesn't know. Almost nothing Coulson doesn't know either.What the fuck has Brooks got on Murdoch?
Are you serious? She was there at the start, at junior 'journalist' level - there is nothing she doesn't know. Almost nothing Coulson doesn't know either.What the fuck has Brooks got on Murdoch?
We all know this must happen - how else would the papers get hold of the stories they get hold of. But it's the proof that has been lacking. This needs not to be confined to the NOTW, which is surely what NI are trying to do. It needs to be spread at least to the Sun but further if possible - to the Times, anyone.
Who expected this?
Be honest.
Some may have.
But there were, as I said above, very, very few NUJ members in Wapping.
More at the Mail - but, as I understand it, more on the sub-editing side.
28 June 2011
Wapping executive changes herald move to seven-day operation
Share233 reddit this Comments (8)
News International has created what it calls a "managing editor structure" at its four newspapers in what appears to be a move towards a form of integration of daily and Sunday titles.
According to a press release, these "unique new roles will support editors in the implementation of editorial integration and redefine the way in which editorial budgets are allocated and spent."
But the real story is indicated by the quotes from Wapping's chief executive, Rebekah Brooks.
She explains that the new structure "will enable each title to share best practice and to focus more resources on front-line journalism and content creation."
And her next two sentences offer a clue to what that means:
"We will take a comprehensive look at where there is common ground across our titles and where we should remain unique.
Where there is common ground we will find ways of implementing efficiencies to editorial systems and processes and, where appropriate, we will find ways of introducing seven day working."
fry and laurie's sketch on a world without News International...
I am so saddened by this, and so sympathetic, that I've had to turn the music up to drown out my hysterical laughter. I assume that they will all be malingering no good lazy dole scroungers from next week and I hope they all get the treatment they've been demanding for others.
It doesn't matter. The entire profession should be wary regardless of where they work. This is an opportunity for the NUJ to mean something again, or it can choose to simply continue to fade into irrelevance. It certainly shouldn't be simply attacking Murdoch and his senior management as if nobody else shares in the blame and as if there are no potential repurcussions for any publication other then the NotW.
James Murdoch said:I can understand how unfair these decisions may feel, particularly for colleagues who will leave the company.
private eye are sure to bring something out about this, will make interesting reading
This. If a union cannot demonstrate why it, and membership of it, are vital when 200 employees are being sacked solely to protect an executive then it should really just fuck off.
With a grimace, Chris Bryant recalls the last time he met Rupert Murdoch's embattled lieutenant Rebekah Brooks face to face.
"She came up to me and said, 'Oh, Mr Bryant, it's after dark - shouldn't you be on Clapham Common?"
"At which point Ross Kemp [the ex-EastEnders actor and her then husband] said, 'Shut up, you homophobic cow'."
You have GOT to be kidding. The tabloid/redtop end of the market is hugely profitable - it's their 'quality' brethren that are in financial troubleThey make fuck all from newspapers.
This. If a union cannot demonstrate why it, and membership of it, are vital when 200 employees are being sacked solely to protect an executive then it should really just fuck off.
They're all in trouble. Do you really think that 20p, or even close, covers wages, printing, marketing and distribution?
Nope.
It's the advertising that they are after. And all titles are sold together as a group.
Never the less The Sun and until this week the NOTW are/were big money makers so obviously you're wrong. In fact they were helping to subsidise the Times, which should make things interesting over there.
I didn't think it'd go this far, no.
From the above:
You have until lunchtime tomorrow to send in your submission.
You can obtain the full text of Beowulf here (26,000 words / 200k) - please adapt this template to express your own views on heirs, dragons, etc
News International (NI) have just announced the closure of the largest circulation English language newspaper in the world. NI have only owned this paper for a tiny fraction of its 168 year history. There is no longer even a business case for allowing this incompetent and corrupt organisation to take over any more British media, and surely now a very strong case for barring them from any media ownership in this country at all.
This is a democracy. It is inconceivable that we would allow an organisation that has preyed on our children, our dead, our bereaved, on any innocent, private individual who found themselves unwillingly in the public eye, to continue to operate here.
Please, have the courage shown by so many others in standing up to this vile, bullying corporation:
1. stop the BSkyB deal
2. force the sale of all British media currently owned by News International
Companies that break British law are not welcome here. There is no reason to deport criminal people but not criminal companies, and it would be obscene if any such argument were made. This is a democracy, and the will of the people must be be obeyed. No more News International assets on British soil. They have had too many chances, there can be no more.
No to the BSkyB acquisition and no to News International.
ymu