Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail "hacked by News of the World"

Did they ask him how NI came to pay Gordon Taylor £700,000 specifically because the lawyers said that there was evidence of widespread illegal activity. Did Murdoch claim that he didn't authorise it, or did he just make the payment on the nod without even looking at the legal advice?
 
To sum up:

James Murdoch was nowhere near the grassy knoll, he did not have sexual relations with that woman, and he definitely thought those things really were shower blocks.
 
Only the Daily Mail but:

Police investigating phone-hacking at the
News of the World have recovered a
series of ‘bombshell’ emails which they
believe takes the inquiry to ‘a new level’ .

The emails were among tens of
thousands held by the newspaper at a
data storage facility in India.

Police are believed to want to question
News International chief James Murdoch
and former Sun and News of the World
editor Rebekah Brooks about their
contents.

Discussions have taken place with the
Crown Prosecution Service about
whether Mr Murdoch should be arrested
and interviewed under caution.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2060569/Phone-hacking-James-Murdoch-questioned-bombshell-emails-found.html
 
Police investigating phone-hacking at the News of the World have recovered a series of ‘bombshell’ emails which they believe takes the inquiry to ‘a new level’.
The emails were among tens of thousands held by the newspaper at a data storage facility in India.
Police are believed to want to question News International chief James Murdoch and former Sun and News of the World editor Rebekah Brooks about their contents.
Daily Mail


 
Peter Preston quite eloquently - not to mention gleefully - jumps up and down on the Murdoch carcass:
There's the tragedy for the son and the family, but worst of all for Rupert. Those who didn't quite believe it in the summer must surely acknowledge it now: James Murdoch can never sit at his father's desk. The whole succession scenario is bust. The Murdoch hegemony stops here. No sentient shareholder is going to let the family run things hands-on any longer. Just sit back and cash the dividends.

There may be more rumours about a Sun on Sunday come the dawn of 2012, but forget them. We can't even be sure there'll be a Sun if James's readiness to shut it (should more hacking be discovered) is tested. There won't be any clear, calm, imminent moment when, all passion spent, the Bun seems wholesome again. Trinity Mirror, its profits bulwarked by the greatest ever stroke of luck, can carry on smiling. The murk of 2011 will just linger on (oozing into view every time Tom Watson mentions a new private eye).

Those who like strong medicine and stronger penalties against malfeasance may care to count the payback thus far. For Murdoch: no heir, no News of the World, some $90m (£56m) gone, a reputation and an influence lost, a family at war. For James: no glowing future. For many of the rest of the gang: no jobs and possibly no freedom either. Retribution doesn't come crueller than this. Hacking can damage your health, wealth, your nearest and dearest. Hacking has sundered the biggest media empire in the globe: and many things, including Wapping and, less joyously, the papers that remain, can never be quite the same again.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/13/phone-hacking-james-murdoch-comment?newsfeed=true
 
Geoffery Robinson very sensibly agrees with the general sentiment here - and makes a very strong point:
James Murdoch – the world's most forgetful manager – was lightly grilled this week by a "parliamentary select committee" of MPs selected only by virtue of their inability at cross-examination. It was a lengthy reprise of "Yes you did" (know about all the illegal hacking) and "No, I didn't" (because my editor, my lawyers and my executives failed to tell me the truth).
So what happens now? The select committee is an amateur exercise of little legal consequence – it will now write its report, although under UK contempt law it will be severely limited in its comments in case they prejudice impending trials. These trials are likely to be further delayed because News International has deluged Scotland Yard with 300m emails, which will take the police years just to read.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/nov/11/james-murdoch-forgetful-manager?newsfeed=true
 
Only the Daily Mail but:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2060569/Phone-hacking-James-Murdoch-questioned-bombshell-emails-found.html

Hmm, is Dacre turning against the Digger too? Like just about everyone bar the Graun, the Fail have been relatively quiet on Wappinggate. If 'Middle England' of the Mail's fantasies turns on NI, it could be their one good deed for the century.
 
Hmm, is Dacre turning against the Digger too? Like just about everyone bar the Graun, the Fail have been relatively quiet on Wappinggate. If 'Middle England' of the Mail's fantasies turns on NI, it could be their one good deed for the century.

He appears to be - but not as strongly as he attacked the Guardian and Independent in his presentation to Lord Leveson.

This could be a high-risk position for Dacre, given what I expect to come out about the Fail's use of private investigators...
 
Hmm, is Dacre turning against the Digger too? Like just about everyone bar the Graun, the Fail have been relatively quiet on Wappinggate. If 'Middle England' of the Mail's fantasies turns on NI, it could be their one good deed for the century.

The mirror weren't tbf.
 
Stavros has a point though - traditionally, these bastards have a code of not shitting on their own, presumably because they've each got so many skeletons we'd never hear the end of it.
That code's dead now, thanks to this.
 
on that subject, does anyone know whether steve whittamore or any other PIs have been jailed for illegally accessing info (by dint of hacking or bribery) since the Milly Dowler hacking story broke? or what the situation on them is?
 
I've not seen anyone else cover the Fail story - were they perhaps rehashing old information?

And from the US: http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201111120004?frontpage

I've not watched the vid but "Roy Greenslade Tells Media Matters Radio: "Every Single Member Of The Parliamentary Committee Investigating [Phone Hacking] Were Followed By Private Eyes And/Or Members Of [News of the World] Staff"

Surely that has to be some form o Contempt of Parliament. I wonder whether anyone will recall who ordered that. Some of the comments are interesting. (I like the way they indent asides from people, too. )

(And bloody hell Roy Greenslade must be getting on, it has to be 50 years since he starred in the Goons.)


 
He appears to be - but not as strongly as he attacked the Guardian and Independent in his presentation to Lord Leveson.

This could be a high-risk position for Dacre, given what I expect to come out about the Fail's use of private investigators...

Dacre may be a total and utter camel cunt, but he's not stupid. I suspect he's already worked out a damage-limitation strategy for the Mail, and I further suspect it's one that'll be tied to him taking the hit for any Mail wrongdoing by retiring (which he's been planning, but has repeatedly put on hold for the last 3-4 years). I may be wrong, but Dacre, as an individual, is fanatically-committed to the Mail titles, far more so than most of his contemporaries.
 
Back
Top Bottom