Milo Yiannoupoulis banned!

[8den]

An ex poster who was proper photographer used to (quite understandably) give new people a hard time when they wouldn't listen to his advice and decided instead (more rarely understandably) that their opinion on photography was just as valid as his despite his years' of actually doing it.

The conversation fairly rapidly descended into abuse. What they didn't seem to realize was that he'd gone through the exact same point that they were arguing with him on dozens of times. What he didn't seem to realize that he'd never been through that point with that particular person before.

Bungle?

 

[Pickman's model]

Bungle?

Sadly not ex

 

[Pickman's model]

You care too much

She cares a lot.

 

[emanymton]

you've had a run in with someone on the internet and you want to turn it into a real life beef. if you're not a fool you're certainly doing a good impression of one. and you have said to them 'yes i am interested but i am not getting involved with a group with butchersapron in it': it is, in effect, a choice between you and butchersapron. you can see that, can't you. can't you?

and if i am longwinded your windbaggy reply is, what, a veritable record-breaking fart of a post.

It's not really much of a choice is it?

 

[Pickman's model]

It's not really much of a choice is it?

Poor Biscuitician

 

[pengaleng]

She cares a lot.

this is wrong.

 

[Biscuitician]

He is behaving like an adult: I hope you are not pursuing an ageist agenda.

No, he really isn't.

Why did you claim i said you were longwinded?

 

[Pickman's model]

this is wrong.

I was thinking of the famous faith no more song

 

[Biscuitician]

Poor Biscuitician

I'm not interested in sympathy so there' sno need to be passive aggressive

 

[Pickman's model]

No, he really isn't.

Why did you claim i said you were longwinded?

Because you did.

 

[Biscuitician]

Because you did.

citation needed.

EDIT: you are correct. I apologise.

 

[pengaleng]

I was thinking of the famous faith no more song

not that bit. a word.

 

[Pickman's model]

I'm not interested in sympathy so there' sno need to be passive aggressive

that's fine, because i am not being passive aggressive.

 

[Biscuitician]

that's fine, because i am not being passive aggressive.

So just rude then, yeah you're done

 

[kabbes]

I can't speak for anyone else and I haven't been arsed to read your beef posts with butchers, biscuitician, and have frankly just skipped them all instead.

But I do know that I have e-known butchers for many, many years and have come to value and respect what he says as always being worth thinking about, no matter how abrasive a package he has wrapped it in. Whereas you I don't know from adam.

I don't think I am unique in that position. Something to reflect upon whilst you continue to play to the gallery.

 

[Biscuitician]

I can't speak for anyone else and I haven't been arsed to read your beef posts with butchers, biscuitician, and have frankly just skipped them all instead.

But I do know that I have e-known butchers for many, many years and have come to value and respect what he says as always being worth thinking about, no matter how abrasive a package he has wrapped it in. Whereas you I don't know from adam.

I don't think I am unique in that position. Something to reflect upon whilst you continue to play to the gallery.

Your point is what? That because you like the guy that gives him a free pass to harass me? I've said nothing to him and yet he and his mates decide to behave like arseholes and cowards? This is your defence?

 

[kabbes]

Your point is what? That because you like the guy that gives him a free pass to harass me? I've said nothing to him and yet he and his mates decide to behave like arseholes and cowards? This is your defence?

My point is what it is. What you do with it is up to you.

 

[Biscuitician]

My point is what it is. What you do with it is up to you.

You didn't make a point.

You simply said "butchers is great".

Not great enough to defend his sniping and his bullying though.

Do you think that excuses bad behaviour?

 

[inva]

Your point is what? That because you like the guy that gives him a free pass to harass me? I've said nothing to him and yet he and his mates decide to behave like arseholes and cowards? This is your defence?

you claim to be a new poster here, you've had this account for what, a few weeks or so, and in that space of time you've apparently managed to develop such a major grudge against another poster that you've actually grassed them up in real life to some political organisation or whatever it is? don't you think taking a step back, cooling down, getting more familiar with the community here etc might be a good idea?

 

[Biscuitician]

you claim to be a new poster here, you've had this account for what, a few weeks or so, and in that space of time you've apparently managed to develop such a major grudge against another poster that you've actually grassed them up in real life to some political organisation or whatever it is? don't you think taking a step back, cooling down, getting more familiar with the community here etc might be a good idea?

Everything was fine, as my posting record and the responses to it can attest, until this nastiness appeared. He had every opporunity to behave like an adult. He has yet to do so. I have no compunctions about "grassing" him up, never mind that your overblown appraisal thereof is just adding fuel to the fire. Why should I have to be the one to take a step back? I've done nothing wrong.

What would familiarity achieve? I've tried being pleasant, and it's gotten nothing more than insinuations and unpleasantness and now that I defend myself I get even more. Are you seriously defending this? Why don't you be a little more objective?

 

[Pickman's model]

So just rude then, yeah you're done

Yeh and why not after the rudeness you've shown?

Only I wasn't being rude. You do like your accusations of passive aggression, might like to do something about that.

 

[Pickman's model]

Everything was fine, as my posting record and the responses to it can attest, until this nastiness appeared. He had every opporunity to behave like an adult. He has yet to do so. I have no compunctions about "grassing" him up, never mind that your overblown appraisal thereof is just adding fuel to the fire. Why should I have to be the one to take a step back? I've done nothing wrong.

What would familiarity achieve? I've tried being pleasant, and it's gotten nothing more than insinuations and unpleasantness and now that I defend myself I get even more. Are you seriously defending this? Why don't you be a little more objective?

So you are being ageist

 

[butchersapron]

You have twice been expelled from this community for your behaviour biscuitian. It's clear that you didn't bother to ask the mods if it was OK to post again. You've started all your disruptive old stuff. Your disruptive old stuff was horrible. Racist, misogynistic, constantly abusive. You have openly lied to all the posters here in your denials of being the previous posters named 'awesome wells and 'wish face'. What do you think you'd add to the posting group - in 150 words or less please.

 

[killer b]

more than twice tbf

 

[Biscuitician]

You have twice been expelled from this community for your behaviour biscuitian. It's clear that you didn't bother to ask the mods if it was OK to post again. You've started all your disruptive old stuff. Your disruptive old stuff was horrible. Racist, misogynistic, constantly abusive. You have openly lied to all the posters here in your denials of being the previous posters named 'awesome wells and 'wish face'. What do you think you'd add to the posting group - in 150 words or less please.

Wrong. You continue to assert this crap. Now you want to insinuate that I'm posting "horrible. Racist, misogynistic, constantly abusive" stuff. Evidence please.

 

[butchersapron]

more than twice tbf

Quite possibly - two nailed on. Either way, someone who has lied throughout this thread and demanded that he be judged on his behaviour alone. We're doing that lad, we're doing that.

 

[butchersapron]

Wrong. You continue to assert this crap. Now you want to insinuate that I'm posting "horrible. Racist, misogynistic, constantly abusive" stuff. Evidence please.

Did you post under the names 'wish face' and 'awesome wells'?

 

[Biscuitician]

Quite possibly - two nailed on. Either way, someone who has lied throughout this thread and demanded that he be judged on his behaviour alone. We're doing that lad, we're doing that.

Nope. You've provided nothing, just made assertions. Show me one thing that I've said that's racist or misogynistic. Show me 'constantly abusive'?

You're the one causing the grief, and you're the coward that started all this. There was no acrimony until you decided I was someone else. None whatsoever.

And you wonder why I don't want anything to do with groups where you are involved.

 

[Biscuitician]

Did you post under the names 'wish face' and 'awesome wells'?

Asked and answered. You don't get to put me on trial, 'lad'.

Especially when you've yet to provide a shred of evidence to justify your claims about my character.

 

[kabbes]

You didn't make a point.

You simply said "butchers is great".

Not great enough to defend his sniping and his bullying though.

Do you think that excuses bad behaviour?

That you can't see a point does not mean one isn't being made.