Funky_monks
Neo-Rustic
I think I made something very similar out of solder in DT when I was at school (I didn't put a tiny naked woman on top though). So close, and yet, so far....
I honestly wasn't even looking at her nik naks.The amorphous silver Nik Nak really speaks to some I suppose.
Are public statues of naked women like this common then?No just people tired of women being naked in art.
Because it's not what we do that's important, it's what we look like. We must be decorative, even when representing a great thinker.
The more I consider it the more annoyed I am. This is a fucking travesty.
Are public statues of naked women like this common then?
I can't tell if that's sarcasm.Are public statues of naked women like this common then?
Bloody hell never seen that before Im not saying it should or shouldn’t be (I genuinely don’t have an opinion) but I’m really surprised that’s there. It’s justAh. You see, I know this is controversial but i love Verity.
Verity was part of Hirst's plan to gentrify Ilfracombe. It's a branding excercise for him. Public space, particularly in such a beautiful location, shouldn't be spaffed all over by poncy London cunts for private gain.
It’s a good point, but how many people would stroll around the ground floor of the v&a ?.Lets put it like this, do you see many public statues of naked men?
Stroll on down the Mall, how many naked blokes are there? Now how many scantily clad or bare breasted ladies do you see?
Go to the V&A and stroll around the ground floor, how many naked women do you see vs naked men*?
*lots of cupids mind
Right, it should have been an ugly figure cos that'd make the point betterIt’s a good point, but how many people would stroll around the ground floor of the v&a ?.
My main problem with it is it’s such a beach body figure in the statue, celebrating a feminist figure too, it just muddles whatever message she is trying to get out.
It’s a good point, but how many people would stroll around the ground floor of the v&a ?.
Go to the British Museum and you'll see way more naked men.Lets put it like this, do you see many public statues of naked men?
Stroll on down the Mall, how many naked blokes are there? Now how many scantily clad or bare breasted ladies do you see?
Go to the V&A and stroll around the ground floor, how many naked women do you see vs naked men*?
*lots of cupids mind
What point is she trying to make?.Right, it should have been an ugly figure cos that'd make the point better
Or like pretty much all the public statues of men in london, bar the machine gun corps memorial at Hyde park corner, she could have clothes on
Right, it should have been an ugly figure cos that'd make the point better
Or like pretty much all the public statues of men in london, bar the machine gun corps memorial at Hyde park corner, she could have clothes on
"This sculpture encourages a visual conversation with the obstacles Ms Wollstonecraft overcame, the ideals she strived for, and what she made happen.
I mean I think we can all agree that, even if some of his art has its merits, Hirst is a titanic bellend.
No just people tired of women being naked in art.
Because it's not what we do that's important, it's what we look like. We must be decorative, even when representing a great thinker.
The more I consider it the more annoyed I am. This is a fucking travesty.
Wollstonecraft maintains that women are human beings deserving of the same fundamental rights as men, and that treating them as mere ornaments or property for men undercuts the moral foundation of society.
Suppose this is the classic modern one of a clothed figure:Thinking about all the statues I like, and there probably aren't that many, they're pretty much all naked bodies - male and female. Clothed figures don't make for good statues. What is more interesting to explore? The contours of a living human body or the quality of a fabric?
Thinking about all the statues I like, and there probably aren't that many, they're pretty much all naked bodies - male and female. Clothed figures don't make for good statues. What is more interesting to explore? The contours of a living human body or the quality of a fabric?
Thinking about all the statues I like, and there probably aren't that many, they're pretty much all naked bodies - male and female. Clothed figures don't make for good statues. What is more interesting to explore? The contours of a living human body or the quality of a fabric?
Putting tape over the statue's boobs and bush is a pretty sad response, imo. Let's have more statues of naked bodies, male and female, young and old. Beats the fuck out of most of the tedious shit that normally gets put up.
Thinking about all the statues I like, and there probably aren't that many, they're pretty much all naked bodies - male and female. Clothed figures don't make for good statues. What is more interesting to explore? The contours of a living human body or the quality of a fabric?
Putting tape over the statue's boobs and bush is a pretty sad response, imo. Let's have more statues of naked bodies, male and female, young and old. Beats the fuck out of most of the tedious shit that normally gets put up.