Main thing 'men's rights' types don't get?

[camouflage]

I read a bit of red pill nonsense the other day (actually, I mostly read primers about MRA stuff).

One thing that struck me is that men are categorised all over the place (alpha/betas/cucks/incels/etc...) but that only one category of women exists, albeit that she changes status in her late 20s. But women are all discussed as if they have the same attractiveness, income etc.

No surprises, I guess - but it points out just how intellectually superficial it all really is.

Women are categorized a lot too. Perhaps in different ways. Or maybe it's not the categorization (which is how human beings process understanding anyway) but the language sort of thing, I mean "alphas, betas, cucks, incels..." that horrible reductionist language, almost brutal really. Axe-words making legless armless torsos to be shoved into boxes, heads sticking out showing label stuck on foreheads.

If they do that to men then fuck knows what they do to women in their... edgy filing system.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

I know I'm going to regret asking this. I can guess what a 'cuck' is, but what is an 'incel'?

 

[fishfinger]

I know I'm going to regret asking this. I can guess what a 'cuck' is, but what is an 'incel'?

Involuntary celibate.

 

[spanglechick]

I know I'm going to regret asking this. I can guess what a 'cuck' is, but what is an 'incel'?

As fishfinger says.

Because apparently "having a personality so boring/inflexible/unpleasant that no one wants to be in a relationship with you" doesn't have quite the same ring. Instead it's apparently the women at fault, because (despite evidence to the contrary being literally everywhere you look) women only want rich, tall men (alphas), until they decide to get married, when they all apparently settle for a "beta cuck" who will provide for her until she decides to divorce and bankrupt him.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

As fishfinger says.

Because apparently "having a personality so boring/inflexible/unpleasant that no one wants to be in a relationship with you" doesn't have quite the same ring. Instead it's apparently the women at fault, because (despite evidence to the contrary being literally everywhere you look) women only want rich, tall men (alphas), until they decide to get married, when they all apparently settle for a "beta cuck" who will provide for her until she decides to divorce and bankrupt him.

And you were reading this shit?

 

[spanglechick]

And you were reading this shit?

Like a car crash. I read a few pages of one entitled little shit's woe-is-me blog, then skipped to an article on "we hunted the mammoth" which is an mra-monitoring blog, and read a few articles linked from there.

 

[NoXion]

I read a bit of red pill nonsense the other day (actually, I mostly read primers about MRA stuff).

One thing that struck me is that men are categorised all over the place (alpha/betas/cucks/incels/etc...) but that only one category of women exists, albeit that she changes status in her late 20s. But women are all discussed as if they have the same attractiveness, income etc.

No surprises, I guess - but it points out just how intellectually superficial it all really is.

Actually, I think they do rank women (and themselves) by physical attractiveness on a 10 point scale.

But yeah, any other qualities and attributes are completely irrelevant to those dicks.

 

[likesfish]

mra rating is something like
10 teenage cheerleader virgin who wants to get with Alpha male obvious mra/pua blogg writer

every non virgin is obviously a slut who unlucky beta cucks might get unless of course their a feminist then their a lesbian or in denial their a lesbian.
its basically politics for bateman just not as well thought out.
which would be acceptable if your a poorly socialised 14year old boy but among adults its rather scary.