I refer you to my earlier answer: #386
That's not an answer.I refer you to my earlier answer: #386
As an independent? Monster Raving Loony Party?Erm...I did stand for the local elections once.
I have answered all of your questions, now can you answer mine, what country do you live in?That's not an answer.
Are you a politician?
Never heard of them, what were your policies?The Valley Party.
You're being dishonest again.I have answered all of your questions, now can you answer mine, what country do you live in?
Independence for our Valley.
Who did you used to be before this latest incarnation?
He's not a banned returner.
Really? His or her shtick is very familiar. The hatred of the left, referring to the working class as morons/stupid etc.
Fair enough. It's quite sad if that's the case. Although many us here have mental health problems and can get by without trashing the site.Not unique views are they.
Look, he spent ages trying to learn how to play the Google Maps game (and failed miserably, which is a shame because we need more players). You don't do that as a banned returner.
He's old, right wing, and has medical problems, some which may be affecting his mental health which, you were right earlier, he projects on to here.
He is now kind of trolling, I wonder if he's ok, but it's making him happy. So
Lots of people on here are ill and sometimes get hounded to the sound of applause by some.
Including people who say it's wrong to hound someone who is ill.
Maybe some people know more about one person than another and judge that because of what they know about them, hounding them is unfair.
But they don't then apply that same yardstick to their treatment of others.
This is my new favourite insult.
Cross-thread insult but you're
Lmao, Marxism-Leninism is when CHAZ and ACAB? So is police of any kind, inherently the enemy? Who's gonna protect your precious "autonomous zone"? A revolution must not be restricted to a small area, but an entire nationwide uprising of plentiful of cities. As for Wapping, it was not much of a revolution for it was a mere strike which was necessary against the neoliberal Thatcher government but the police were majorly loyal to Thatcher and so, the printers were defeated sadly in 1987. But the message was clear.Not often I say this, but I think you're being a bit harsh on Marxist-Leninists there, I'm sure there must've been more than a few who did their duty in 84-85 or at Wapping. Or indeed in various US cities during 2020, and at any other number of other times and places. Although I suppose you could argue that by contributing to struggle alongside their fellow proletarians, they were no longer acting as M-Ls, having broken with the essentially Fabian practice of that movement throughout its history.
The Labour Party is a fraud to the workers. The reason why the Labour party is alive is because they dismissed workers' rights and moved to typical social democratic reactionary electoralism.The Labour Party is a fraud. if we had proportional representation they wouldn't even get 20%. The only thing that's kept Labour alive for the last 40 years is our completely out of date dilapidated antique antiquated unfair hopeless electoral system first past the post.
So left-wing is when complete anarchy and rejection of material conditions? Tell me how using the workers' state to clamp down on bourgeois counter-revolution (of whom the bourgeoisie in power used the same methods to counter strikes, rebellions, with same ruthless killings) is the same? Someone whose labor is being sold to the bourgeoisie in your eyes is apparently on the same level of "evil" as the wealthy rich elite man who is overseeing his wage slaves?I think if this thread is to get anywhere, and I'm not hopeful, it would be a good idea to reflect on what 'left wing' means. If you go back to the 19th century and early 20th centuries there emerges a general division into three broad camps in the international labour movement, Marxist, anarchist and reformist. If we lump them all together we just ignore massive theoretical divisions and 150 years of historical and geographical divergence. So my attempt to bring this thread back to some semblance of intellectual rigour goes like this:-
Anarchists - generally good eggs, honest and stalwart.
Reformists - corrupt, boring, two-faced
Marxists - hypocritical, mass-murdering, corrupt
Jesus, you're the one I'm having a go at, not all the rest. if you hadn't negatively repped me I wouldn't have bothered replying to this thread, but you did, so I expanded on what I had previously written.Really? His or her shtick is very familiar. The hatred of the left, referring to the working class as morons/stupid etc.
The proletariat gaining power? How would they do that seeing as they have the lowest IQ's and the least ability to run a country most of them can't even run their own lives let alone a country.
Perhaps we should encourage itIs Yugoslav using chatGPU for their posts?
IQ is influenced by a variety of factors, including environment, education, access to resources, and socioeconomic status. While socioeconomic status can impact educational opportunities and access to enriching experiences, it doesn't determine a person's intelligence or potential.