Serge Forward
Just enjoyin' my coffee.
Paul Mason used to be fairly decent when he was on channel 4 news. Pity, I predict he'll end up as a leftish version of David Icke
The providing "intellectual’ veneer" thing has been on mind with him for a while now...it gives shilling for Starmer an ‘intellectual’ veneer I suppose...
The providing "intellectual’ veneer" thing has been on mind with him for a while now...
In Live Working or Die Fighting the structure of the book is to take an episode of historical workers struggle - say French garment works in London in the 1800s IIRC, and then follow it with a contemporary moment - Chinese sweatshop garment workers today.
That making history relevant and finding the continuity really worked on me - its an obvious point maybe, but he makes it well.
I get the feeling its something he keeps trying to do, but with each time its seems more and more absurd - i haven't got a concrete example to hand, but effectively talking about the Paris Commune in one breath and Starmer in the second....and hes doing it again now.
As he's someone clearly very well versed in left history - infinitely more knowledgeable than i am - I find it hard to dismiss out of hand, but it does have the air of a delusional attempt to find something in common with his more revolutionary pre-breakdown politics and post-breakdown electioneering politics.
I understand being drawn to a cynical realpolitik worldview, and trying to be realistic about forces of power, but even the reformist in me knows where the line is, and Mason has clearly crossed it.
Yeah, it feels almost Jekyll and Hyde in some ways - I just wish there was some way to extract out the nice Comrade Paul who likes the Paris Commune and the mass revolts that ended WWI from mad Mr Mason who wants Biden to build a stronger security state. As far as recent examples go, he's been boosting a Paris Commune anniversaries account:The providing "intellectual’ veneer" thing has been on mind with him for a while now...
In Live Working or Die Fighting the structure of the book is to take an episode of historical workers struggle - say French garment works in London in the 1800s IIRC, and then follow it with a contemporary moment - Chinese sweatshop garment workers today.
That making history relevant and finding the continuity really worked on me - its an obvious point maybe, but he makes it well.
I get the feeling its something he keeps trying to do, but with each time its seems more and more absurd - i haven't got a concrete example to hand, but effectively talking about the Paris Commune in one breath and Starmer in the second....and hes doing it again now.
As he's someone clearly very well versed in left history - infinitely more knowledgeable than i am - I find it hard to dismiss out of hand, but it does have the air of a delusional attempt to find something in common with his more revolutionary pre-breakdown politics and post-breakdown electioneering politics.
I understand being drawn to a cynical realpolitik worldview, and trying to be realistic about forces of power, but even the reformist in me knows where the line is, and Mason has clearly crossed it.
Yeah, it feels a bit tautologous/no true scotsman-y: there are lots and lots of examples of fascist movements in history, probably the vast majority of them did not come to power, but for any of them that were defeated you could probably argue that a) they weren't truly mass enough to qualify, and b) people outside the labour movement also opposed them. I think there's a vast, vast amount of middle ground to explore in between "I think the labour movement as it currently stands is capable of defeating mass fascism all on its own with no help from anyone" and Mason's "let's do a popular front with Biden, the Lib Dems and the CIA", though." there is NO EXAMPLE IN HISTORY of the labour movement defeating mass fascism on its own... "
<<< any thoughts on that comment though?
Theres a distinction though between defeating existing fascism once its come to power, and defeating it/supressing it before it comes to power,
Mass fascism suggests once its come to power, which is slightly a different scenario
Im well out of my depth here, but i am vaguely aware of this moment though
Spain's Revolution Against Franco: The Great Betrayal - Wellred Books
New paperback 522 pages. Wellred Books July 2019. ISBN: 9781913026141.wellredbooks.net
" there is NO EXAMPLE IN HISTORY of the labour movement defeating mass fascism on its own... "
<<< any thoughts on that comment though?
I think he's still rattled about all the criticism from the left he's been getting recently:
Apparently we're all tankies. What a wanker.
I think he's still rattled about all the criticism from the left he's been getting recently:
Apparently we're all tankies. What a wanker.
Five years and he'll be where Cohen and Aaronovitch were in '97
Looks like I was being too cautiousno doubt, and like Aaronovitch he sees phantom Stalinists everywhere when called out on it.
Looks like I was being too cautious
Johnson has made greed, white victimhood, corruption and xenophobia not only respectable but grimly fashionable in the ex-industrial small towns of England.
There's a lot of 'they' in that piece.Hard Labour
Labour’s electoral debacle, Paul Mason writes, epitomises European social democracy’s coalition-building challenge. It just doesn’t see it that way.www.socialeurope.eu
Hard Labour
Labour’s electoral debacle, Paul Mason writes, epitomises European social democracy’s coalition-building challenge. It just doesn’t see it that way.www.socialeurope.eu
The usual Mason by numbers dribble:
1. Popular frontism
2. Gratuitously offensive to the section of the working class he claims to come from
3. Laughable characterisation of where he lives now
4. Free pass for Starmer
5. Some sprinkling of radical phrasing for those dense enough to buy it/his ego
What made you post it up?
I've just been reminded of this excellent checklist of Mason's for the new Labour leader after the 2019 election defeat, shortly before enthusiastically endorsing Starmer (who's popularity rating is somewhere around -48 right now)
View attachment 267725
Some top quality trolling here
Seems fantastical"And then we sold some papers"
In theory I'm sure you are right, but in practice, lets say taking the US as an example (since you mention Biden and the CIA), what would that constituency actually look like? Whats a half way measure?I think there's a vast, vast amount of middle ground to explore in between "I think the labour movement as it currently stands is capable of defeating mass fascism all on its own with no help from anyone" and Mason's "let's do a popular front with Biden, the Lib Dems and the CIA", though.
I mean, that's a big question, but looking back over the past 4-5 years or so, I feel like the US has gone from having an emboldened, confident far-right that was on the march both figuratively and literally, to having pushed the far-right back a great deal. Cos life is complicated, I feel like there's probably enough evidence that I could cherry-pick examples to prove that it was the black bloc wotdunnit, or Mason could pick enough examples to show that it was actually all down to Biden, but... actually, going back to what Mason said above, his words leading up to that were "Finally the left needs to get its head straight about the state. Either you want state power through elections, in which case you support the state having a legal monopoly of armed force (not guns bcos 2nd Am). Or not... Either you want the state to do its job, under the rule of law, with legislative oversight, or you don't."In theory I'm sure you are right, but in practice, lets say taking the US as an example (since you mention Biden and the CIA), what would that constituency actually look like? Whats a half way measure?
*This is the theme of his forthcoming book by the way, how you cant stop fascism without a cross alliance with the middle class + lets call them centrists