Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

London SlutWalk - now *11th*June, 1pm Trafalgar Square

Status
Not open for further replies.
But won't somebody think about the kids?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/rowanpelling/8562331/I-want-to-take-this-candy-out-of-the-mouths-of-children.html

Even if it's the Torygraph. But aren't these connected: focusing on your identity as a sexual being can be funky and delish, but there's other things that are attractive too. Something babyish, simplistic and rebellious about "Yeah I have the power to direct other peeps feelings about me" does seem sort of 17-year-old when it gets turned into a political protest...
 
Slutwalk and the Naked bike ride? All in one day? Phwwoooarrr!

*rubs trousers

Totally what I was thinking I'm going down on my bike with a camera and wearing my dirty mac the one with the hole cut in the pocket, its also trouping the colour with prince william it could be so awesome!
 
What the fuck are you going on about? I haven't even posted on this thread until that post above :confused: so it's a bit peculiar to accuse posters of hounding you across threads when I've done nothing of the sort.

And people having the same opinion which happens to differ to yours is not ganging up. It just feels like that on a message board

Of course it feels like that, given the number of people gavman narks with his "gav knows best" attitude! :)
 
What gives you the right to tell other people what they can and can't do in private?

Why the fuck do you think promiscuous women are aping men, as opposed to exercising a freedom denied them by control-freaks like you?

Fuck's sake. You can choose who you sleep with, but you need to respect every human being gav, not just those who are exactly like you. You never know, you might even learn something.

With respect

I don't think he's telling anyone what to do, just stating that he has less respect for promiscuous people then for other people. You may not agree but he's entitled to his opinion.

Personally I wouldn't dream of telling anyone how they should live their sex life but I find that I just can't relate well to people who have lots of casual sex as I can't relate to the motivation to do that. Not so much a moral thing as an inability to compute. Listening to someone boast about their sexual adventures with this and that person doesn't inspire me, it just bores me. So, actually maybe I don't care about how much casual; / promiscuous sex people have providing they don't want to tell me all about it.

What on earth happened to a bit of old fashioned romance then eh?
*gets slippers*
 
As for slutwalk it seems to be a manifestation of one extreme of the virgin / whore continuum.

Like reclaim the night only with corsets and high heels instead of dungarees and bad haircuts.
 
I am a romantic. A true one. Serial monogamy is a lie. For me, anyway. People that special just don't come along very often.
 
I am a romantic. A true one. Serial monogamy is a lie. For me, anyway. People that special just don't come along very often.

Aye

I think that many people are a lot more romantic at heart than they admit. Most people would love to find "the one". For some people having lots of casual sex is a way of pretending not to care about how empty and lonely their life is. Not that there's anything wrong with that if it gets them through the day.
 
It's partly about that. It's mainly about not shacking up with any old cunt just to get sex.
 
It's partly about that. It's mainly about not shacking up with any old cunt just to get sex.

But in doing so then that person just ends up fucking "any old cunt" just to have sex.

Which seems a bit sad / pointless / risky to me.

I mean, do these people have paralysed fingers and no access to sex toys? Or something.
 
Like reclaim the night only with corsets and high heels instead of dungarees and bad haircuts.

Yeah, that's it in a nutshell. The fundamental point made by the two groups is exactly the same. IIRC (after about 30 years), one of the slogans of Reclaim the Night around 1980 was "Yes means yes and no means no, whatever we wear, wherever we go!" The demonstrating 'sluts' today are emphasising the bit about 'whatever we wear'.
 
But in doing so then that person just ends up fucking "any old cunt" just to have sex.

Which seems a bit sad / pointless / risky to me.

I mean, do these people have paralysed fingers and no access to sex toys? Or something.

sex toys don't look at you with lust in their eyes while they rip your clothes off and shag you into next week.

casual sex - if you enjoy it as a leisuretime activity, which i appreciate not everyone can do - is generally tremendously life-affirming. sex toys are just wanking. it's like comparing a fantastic, frantic tennis knockabout with a session of swingball.
 
Sure, good sex with a partner is better than masturbation, but masturbation is way better than sex where you don't feel much for the other person IMO.

The other problem for me is that sex makes me feel closer to my partner and if he's a wrongun, as has happened in my youth, then I end up being in love with a wrongun, which is bad news and not a situation I'd want to be in again.


I don't begrudge other people recreational sex, it's just not my thing.
 
But in doing so then that person just ends up fucking "any old cunt" just to have sex.

Which seems a bit sad / pointless / risky to me.

I mean, do these people have paralysed fingers and no access to sex toys? Or something.

Toys don't do it for me.

I write about this a lot:
Perhaps I will solve this by being so unattractive you don't even want to see my ankles


Frankly, I'm banking on it .

But you can play with my tits anyway, if you want. I can't bring myself to agree that they count.

Ah shit. They do, don't they?

I am on virgin territory here, Sean. I never knew I could be tempted like this. It's outside my experience.

My periods stopped not long after they started so I've long assumed I was infertile and become used to it. My first love committed suicide when I was 18. I realised I didn't want to be tied to anyone I didn't love and so I stayed alone (and often lonely, it's not like I didn't want to fall in love) and had a pretty male-fantasy sort of sex-life, suppose. I was a tom-boy too, and at least half of my close friends have always been men, so ... I just did sex because I wanted it and a relationship could wait. I was in no hurry.

But I am a romantic. Total romantic. I believe in true love. Not the one ever in your whole entire life (or I'd have been fucked at 18), but in love and trust and fidelity. My own attitude to infidelity is that I could easily forgive an impulsive indiscretion, but not an ongoing love affair. The latter is a threat to me, the former is not.

But that does not mean that I am free to have meaningless flings myself, because his rules are different. And as with conflicting laws one must trump the other on the basis of the more important wound inflicted.

And my incorrigible cunt can survive a disappointment more easily than his gentle soul can survive a battering, know that.

So, I'll leave you with a recollection, which reminds me why we cannot meet:



http://fidelitypornletters.blogspot.com/search?q=romantic
 
I have great fingers and a great imagination (see blog).

But two months without someone else's fingers and penetration I'm not controlling, and I am climbing the fucking walls. What the fuck is wrong with finding someone else who wants the same thing?

Silly not to, quite frankly.
 
Yesterday was one action packed day in London!

slutwalk-london-june-2011-01.jpg


I'll post up a full report soon.,

http://www.urban75.org/blog/sluts-flypasts-naked-bike-rides-and-penny-farthings/
 
With respect

I don't think he's telling anyone what to do, just stating that he has less respect for promiscuous people then for other people. You may not agree but he's entitled to his opinion.

Personally I wouldn't dream of telling anyone how they should live their sex life but I find that I just can't relate well to people who have lots of casual sex as I can't relate to the motivation to do that. Not so much a moral thing as an inability to compute. Listening to someone boast about their sexual adventures with this and that person doesn't inspire me, it just bores me. So, actually maybe I don't care about how much casual; / promiscuous sex people have providing they don't want to tell me all about it.

What on earth happened to a bit of old fashioned romance then eh?
*gets slippers*

thank you for saying it better than i could.
 
What does any of this stuff about casual sex have to do with a woman's right to not be treated like shit because of what they wear?
 
A woman's right to choose without some Victorian moralists carping from the sidelines? The choice of title for the event? Anti-woman bigotry?

That sort of thing.
 
Why can't people just keep their opinions about morality to themselves on a thread about the rights of women to not be harassed when they appear in public?
 
Can see Ymu's point entirely. However I do think there is a precarious link being made about women in public, dressing as they please and casual sex. Which kinda goes against the point of the march IMO.

Those talking about casual sex seem to be speaking from the perspective that a women has the right and reason to engage in casual sex without being called x, y, or z..which is true of course.
 
Why can't people just keep their opinions about morality to themselves on a thread about the rights of women to not be harassed when they appear in public?

Because its tha internetz and people talk about whatever they want to?

Where are these peopele talking about morality anyway? :hmm:

I think I missed that bit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom