story
Changing the facts
Agreed.
Plus he's still being investigated by the Privileges Committee.
Such things can be negotiated away when other things are more convenient
Agreed.
Plus he's still being investigated by the Privileges Committee.
They don't matter, there's no way the MPs will let Johnson be in the final two.
Seems unlikelyHe’ll work very hard
I think this is a bit of a tory myth, though, like the Republicans' Trump myth. Johnson won in 2019 in a particular set of circumstances, but he was very personally unpopular when he was ousted a few months ago and the tories were well behind in the polls at that time. I don't see that changing and I don't see Johnson winning the next GE. And I think most tory MPs don't see it either. Like Trump, he's very popular among a hard core, but widely despised outside it including by many on his own side.They will if he’ll win a GE for them
Unless something very unexpected happens between now and Monday, there's only Sunak, Morduant and Wallace who have a chance of reaching the threshold. But I think there's also a good chance of only Sunak managing a hundred in the first round, in which case he's in without a vote
I think this is a bit of a tory myth, though, like the Republicans' Trump myth. Johnson won in 2019 in a particular set of circumstances, but he was very personally unpopular when he was ousted a few months ago and the tories were well behind in the polls at that time. I don't see that changing and I don't see Johnson winning the next GE. And I think most tory MPs don't see it either. Like Trump, he's very popular among a hard core, but widely despised outside it including by many on his own side.
That doesn't sound very generous or positive at all. I'd say it is definitely Scotland and Northern Ireland that are being held back in a failing Britain. I think it's sadly true that England will never fully examine itself until it's forced to, until it's left alone with itself, to finally realise how it got there.Yes everything will be much easier to sort out once the Scotland and northern Ireland are got shot of - it's time they stop holding england and wales back from doing no holds barred reflection.
There was nothing democratic about the PM being elected by Tory members. In some ways an anointment by Tory MPs is more democratic as those MPs were elected in a general election. Tory members are just wankers who pay their subs. Pay-to-vote is not democracy.But that would be even less democratic than the PM being elected by Tory members.
There was nothing democratic about the PM being elected by Tory members. In some ways an anointment by Tory MPs is more democratic as those MPs were elected in a general election. Tory members are just wankers who pay their subs. Pay-to-vote is not democracy.
Shapps to resign at 11.
He doesn't have to say anything. He has the trump card that he predicted what would happen with Trussonomics. Makes sense to me that he doesn't say anything in public right now. Johnson is reported to be trying to reach out to him. So it's not really all about Johnson. Johnson himself thinks that it's quite a lot about Sunak.I don't get why Sunak hasn't declared his interest, yet? They've (et Mordaunt) allowed for much media narrative to be all about Johnson in these early stages
I don't get why Sunak hasn't declared his interest, yet? They've (et Mordaunt) allowed for much media narrative to be all about Johnson in these early stages
Dignity…always dignity…
Leaving aside the vomiting inducing idea of MPs as some sort of guardians of democracy - I don't get how this is consistent with the politics you claim you want.There was nothing democratic about the PM being elected by Tory members. In some ways an anointment by Tory MPs is more democratic as those MPs were elected in a general election. Tory members are just wankers who pay their subs. Pay-to-vote is not democracy.
I'm not certain the membership would vote loon this time time. They tried that and look how well it went. Enough might have been burnt by the experience that the more "sensible" candidate would win this time. Still the party machine is going to try real hard to not have to put that to the test.So, if they have to get 100 nominations and if 2 or even 3 stand, there's a good chance 2 will make it to a members vote. Anything could happen, but the members are probably more likely to go for a loon (a poll of members even had johnson as their favourite earlier today). But if 5 or so stand, that reduces the chances of anyone other than sunak getting 100. So... the change in the rules could well have an impact on the result.
I'm not certain the membership would vote loon this time time. They tried that and look how well it went. Enough might have been burnt by the experience that the more "sensible" candidate would win this time. Still the party machine is going to try real hard to not have to put that to the test.
I'm not certain the membership would vote loon this time time. They tried that and look how well it went.
There is thatIf they were capable of evidence-based thinking, they wouldn't be tories.
I predict one of Mordaunt, Sunak and Johnson won’t run.
The "planned stitch up" isn't about ensuring any particular candidate wins, it's about preventing anyone who can't get 100 MPs to nominate them actually enter the contest.I want to see which loon ignores the memo about the planned stitch-up and enters the contest, fucking the whole thing up.
From the July 2022 contest, first round votes for Truss + Badenoch + Braverman = 122. Should be enough to get someone swivel-eyed on the ballot if they manage to cooperate.The "planned stitch up" isn't about ensuring any particular candidate wins, it's about preventing anyone who can't get 100 MPs to nominate them actually enter the contest.
That in itself pretty much rules out any "loons", unless you're suggesting any of them can suddenly pull together significantly more supporters than they managed to attract a few months ago.