Combustible
Well-Known Member
I don't think anyone is - and if anyone is concerned about gadaffi being in a postion to crush the rebels they should consider whether these attacks are going to leave him in a stronger position to act when 'western' interest and eyes have moved elsewhere. Gadaffi was praying for this intervention - he's been massively shored up by them and is no the de facto rallying point for those non-rebels who were either previously a bit ambivalent or waiting to see how things play out, any chance of them moving into the rebel camp are probably now definitively gone.
In this thread certainly there have clearly been people who have opposed any western intervention on the principle that it is western intervention and this has included sentiments that it would be better if the rebellion is crushed (along with the inevitable slaughter that would accompany it) then for the west to do anything. Your argument is a different one and it is certainly something that should be factored in and is one of the main reservations I have about western action. But whether it is the case that western intervention helps or hinders a regime depends on a complicated mixture of factors and depends strongly on the dynamics of the situation. And those that have 'no to any intervention' as a starting point are clearly not basing their position on this.