No maybe about it, teacher.
If you say so.
Politics is fundamentally dishonest. If you're only just working that out, you spent too much time jerking your gherkin as a teenager.
And yet there are gay Muslims, Gay Jews, Gay Christians, all existing within their religious communities, because their communities don't care about their sexuality, despite what some joker 1300 (Islam), or 2,500 (Judaism), or 1,700 (Christianity) years ago said.
This would imply that it's not the ideology
per se to blame, but rather, the way that
some elements of those religious communities use FACETS of the ideology for their own ends.
That's a very poor generalisation, which appears to be based on your own preconceptions and prejudices.
I'm not convinced you're bothering to think at all, you're merely regurgitating tropes, the like of which wouldn't be out of place in a right-wing red-top.
Both politics and religion are ideologies of a kind, but where as politics is supposed to deal with - in a democracy, anyway - finding answers through searching for solutions, religion claims to already have answers to any question that might occur to you. There's
slightly more chance of politics giving you actual answers rather than religion, which will give you verities by the bushel.
Which misses an important point (unsurprising, given the lack of substance your witterings display)
"Utopia" is generally NOT what Anarchists, Communists, or even Anarchist Communists (
danny la rouge ) are looking for, it's a collective participative polity based around equality and equity. All too often, actual anarchist organisations don't display that, and are "pale, male and stale" collections of boss-class lifestylers role-playing at being Nestor Makhno, only without the courage or the desire for insurgency.
Do those "Muslim parents" represent ALL Muslim parents to you? If that IS the case, then you're displaying prejudice, and (yet again) generalising.
Experience in other European countries with significant Muslim minorities, says otherwise. Many 2nd generation community members, even given heavy racism in some states, tend to secularise. For them religion becomes a remote observance, even when their parents are from devout roots.
I know plenty of devout Catholics and Protestants who are - pardon the pun - agnostic about LGBT, as they are about abortion. They acknowledge the difficulties of living in "the modern world", and act accordingly.
You make the mistake of seeing politics as being concomitant to one's faith. Very often it isn't, because religious communities are aware of the need to make politics a
community issue, in order to help keep the community together, and preserve it. That often means being on the left, even when your religious ideology would supposedly place you on "the (far) right".
A rational person (not yourself, then) would say "the problem is more complex and nuanced than you're projecting", and also "if people 'attack' you on certain issues, perhaps it's worth taking a look at your arguments, and how someone else might read them".
You're ignorant, you generalise, and you speak of religion and politics as if both have followings whose ideas and aspirations are homogeneous. That's because you're also disingenuous (if not downright dishonest), and know that if you argued from a basis where those followings where heterogeneous, your arguments (such as they are) would fall apart.
