Lambeth Council Watch - news and updates about the 'co-operative' council
- Thread starter editor
- Start date
Rushy
basically a scrotum
Well quite - they have said that open parks will have night wardens which strikes me as significantly more expensive than having someone lock the gates.
I suspect the new Brockwell Hall conference centre is actually the main reason behind keeping it open as they will be operating until late anyway.
BusLanes
Pedestrian
Saves £120k per year across the borough
BusLanes
Pedestrian
I agree that it just doesn't make sense to me that this saves Lambeth any money for Brockwell alone but if we also consider policing costs as well.
The park sits within Herne Hill Ward for some reason so this may mean their local policing team needs to take responsibility as well.
I was at a SNT/ward police community meeting when we all were told by a resident and the police didn't look happy at all.
The park sits within Herne Hill Ward for some reason so this may mean their local policing team needs to take responsibility as well.
I was at a SNT/ward police community meeting when we all were told by a resident and the police didn't look happy at all.
friendofdorothy
Solidarity against neoliberalism!
They already do this in borough of Croydon
GarveyLives
Well-Known Member
Yet again:
A single mother fleeing domestic violence says she has been left in danger by a Southern Housing and Lambeth Council, which have both failed to permanently rehouse her ...
Domestic violence survivor ‘at risk’ from housing association and council’s failure to rehouse her
Eric Jarvis
Well-Known Member
Sadly this is typical. Not just with Lambeth, many local authorities refuse to take their legal safeguarding obligations around domestic and familial abuse seriously. It's disgusting. However Lambeth currently seem to be particularly bad.
Tulster218
Well-Known Member
Our dear Council is yet again in trouble for failing to comply with the Freedom of Information Act after once again refusing to answer a request for information properly.
The Information Commissioner made the ruling over a request for "usage and revenue figures" comparing the performance of Lambeth leisure centres under their former management, (Better), and their current in-house operator, (Active Lambeth). The Council claimed that it didn't hold some of the information and refused to release revenue figures, claiming "commercial confidentiality".
The Commissioner found the Council failed to comply with Sections 1 and 10(1) of FOIA, which require timely and adequate responses to requests. The Council didn't provide any detailed usage data as requested and it failed to justify its refusal to disclose revenue figures. It just gave generic reasons.
The Commissioner's ordered the Council to give the requested usage and revenue data within 30 calendar days. Failure to comply could result in contempt proceedings in the High Court.
The Council’s "internal review" process took nearly six months to complete and the Comissioner thought this was excessive and has told them to improve compliance with their FOI obligations.
Link here: https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2024/4031933/ic-295253-j9y9.pdf
The Information Commissioner made the ruling over a request for "usage and revenue figures" comparing the performance of Lambeth leisure centres under their former management, (Better), and their current in-house operator, (Active Lambeth). The Council claimed that it didn't hold some of the information and refused to release revenue figures, claiming "commercial confidentiality".
The Commissioner found the Council failed to comply with Sections 1 and 10(1) of FOIA, which require timely and adequate responses to requests. The Council didn't provide any detailed usage data as requested and it failed to justify its refusal to disclose revenue figures. It just gave generic reasons.
The Commissioner's ordered the Council to give the requested usage and revenue data within 30 calendar days. Failure to comply could result in contempt proceedings in the High Court.
The Council’s "internal review" process took nearly six months to complete and the Comissioner thought this was excessive and has told them to improve compliance with their FOI obligations.
Link here: https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2024/4031933/ic-295253-j9y9.pdf
Rushy
basically a scrotum
Interesting. I'm just starting an ICO case. I asked for raw data used to produce graphs shown in a consultation document. After six months they sent me back the same graphs themselves. I escalated the query and they have not responded since August, and they've not even registered it as escalated.
Tulster218
Well-Known Member
To be fair, the CEO was probably high on crack for most of that time.
