Hello all.
While Phil's title for this thread was perhaps ill advised, the two examples he posted are shockingly bad. The drum solo is absolutely diabolical - and Editor you did imply that the poor recording made it seem worse than it is... it's just a shit performance, it's out of time and there aren't really any patterns in it, it's mostly just random bollocks.
SpookyFranks' youtube link does show what I'd consider good drumming though! I'm not really that familiar with the Who and at first didn't realise it was Keith Moon - I thought he was trying to compound Phil's argument rather than contradict it. I was surprised it was the same drummer!
So I'd be inclined to agree with Kaka Tim - that drugs and booze really did affect his ability in his later years.
beesonthewhatnow - while you're kind of right that it doesn't matter what individual parts sound like in isolation, this isn'y really true of drums with the exception of the actual balance and tones the the track. As drums are the foundation, and not an accompanying instrument, it really helps if the placement is precise within the patterns - I'm not saying it can't speed up and slow down throughout the song, or that the drummer can't drag the snare, or push the kicks to enhance the feel - that's 'pocket' after all - but that youtube vid phil linked in the first post shows Moon's timing of hits to be very sloppy - lazy kicks, early kicks - it's totally inconsistent and I know it would be much better if it was less sloppy.
I'd like to add that I'm not into soulless over produced and polished perfrmances and recordings, and I do know a bit about the process as I have produced 3 records that have gone gold, and toured extensively as a (quite shit) drummer! I'm not going to embarrass the people I've worked for by linking them to a shitty debate about Keith Moon in a forum online, and franky I couldn't give a shit if people don't believe me. I have also analysed and collected drum tracks and breaks since the mid nineties so would like to think I know a little bit about it.
I would like to point out I am in no way affiliated with Phil! I just thought it was a bit off about 50 people ganging up on one person, when his initial post actually ended with a question asking if others agreed. The way everyone has reacted like ' you can't take moons name in vain!! sacrilege!! ' just because they're Who fans. It's pathetic!!
Some of the arguments and posts 'against' what Phil said are so ill informed that it's laughable - if you don't know which ones then they are most likely yours. MASS DICKHEADNESS
MOON WAS OVERRATED
HE WAS A SHOW-OFF DRUMMER
THAT DRUM SOLO WITH THE GOLDFISH IN THE TOM IS COMPLETELY LACKING IN SOUL AND FEELING YOU WHITE PIGS
sure he was a 'pioneer' of two bass drums, but I bet he did that mostly because of the way it looks anyways...
shame on all of you that just piled in with your ignorant views on Phil when he was already outnumbered - it's basically bullying.
Sx