A recent Kyle Kulinski video in which he describes, in his view, why Biden is shit.
Joe Biden's time is up
- Thread starter petee
- Start date
Thick as pigshit this one.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Who is Kyle kulinski and why should I give a shit about his opinion?
He's your Dad
hitmouse
music obfuscation technology
What do you make of the UAWD caucus, and the strategy of striking the Big Three simultaneously?
hitmouse
music obfuscation technology
François Mitterand's time is not up:
thehill.com
Biden appears to mix up Macron with Mitterrand, French president who died in 1996
President Biden on Sunday appeared to mix up French President Emmanuel Macron with François Mitterrand, the former president of France who died in 1996. The apparent mix-up took place during a Sund…
thehill.com
gosub
~#
gosub
~#
If you mean Special Counsel..
Robert Hur - Wikipedia
Appointed by a Dem Attoney General. And he cleared Biden Also Wiki says he's a Republican...play that card if you want to just adds credidence to idea political affiliations have based everything...which helps a certain other fella facing countless charges
Yossarian
⏭️
The White House is pushing back against the special counsel's report:
The report comes with an attached letter from Mr Biden's legal team, asking that the special counsel "revisit your descriptions of President Biden's memory and revise them so that they are stated in a manner that is within the bounds of your expertise and remit".
"We do not believe that the report's treatment of President Biden's memory is accurate or appropriate," wrote White House lawyer Richard Sauber. "The report uses highly prejudicial language to describe a commonplace occurrence among witnesses: a lack of recall of years-old events."
They may have a point, though with the election still nine months away, maybe they should go the other way and use this as off-ramp for him to step aside and let the party try to find a ticket more likely to beat Trump than Biden-Harris
The report comes with an attached letter from Mr Biden's legal team, asking that the special counsel "revisit your descriptions of President Biden's memory and revise them so that they are stated in a manner that is within the bounds of your expertise and remit".
"We do not believe that the report's treatment of President Biden's memory is accurate or appropriate," wrote White House lawyer Richard Sauber. "The report uses highly prejudicial language to describe a commonplace occurrence among witnesses: a lack of recall of years-old events."
They may have a point, though with the election still nine months away, maybe they should go the other way and use this as off-ramp for him to step aside and let the party try to find a ticket more likely to beat Trump than Biden-Harris
Ax^
Silly Rabbit
If you mean Special Counsel..
Robert Hur - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Appointed by a Dem Attoney General. And he cleared Biden Also Wiki says he's a Republican...play that card if you want to just adds credidence to idea political affiliations have based everything...which helps a certain other fella facing countless charges
look down on appointment side of wiki gosub
merrick is an independant not a dem as well
Yossarian
⏭️
The special counsel did take care to distinguish the Biden case from the Trump prosecution:
With one exception, there is no record of the Department of Justice prosecuting a former president or vice president for mishandling classified documents from his own administration. The exception is former President Trump. It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview, and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.
With one exception, there is no record of the Department of Justice prosecuting a former president or vice president for mishandling classified documents from his own administration. The exception is former President Trump. It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview, and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.
gosub
~#
look down on appointment side of wiki gosub
merrick is an independant not a dem as well
Merrick Garland - Wikipedia
Was also an edit war going on Hur's wiki
gosub
~#
Lawyer who's made it to AG making claims he can't substantiate...republican says nasty thing about president biden after finding out their is no criminal case to resolve
its not political..
Did get a glimpse at the edit history b4 it got locked...this IS very much sharp end we are doing here Ax ...I have no need for it
Ax^
Silly Rabbit
with a straight face and no links to any data from a website do you think it weird that normally without any criminal charges to face
no special consol should excessively overreach in his reporting and explain that whilst he could not find any reason for criminal charges
he still does not think the charges would of stuck because the defendant is old and has a bad memory
no special consol should excessively overreach in his reporting and explain that whilst he could not find any reason for criminal charges
he still does not think the charges would of stuck because the defendant is old and has a bad memory
gosub
~#
With an equally staight face 25th on the table...with a straight face and no links to any data from a website do you think it weird that normally without any criminal charges to face
no special consol should excessively overreact and explain that whilst he could not find any reason for criminal charges
he still does not think the charges would of stuck because the defendant is old and has a bad memory
Similar threads
