Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Kamala Harris' time is up

I'm sure Primo would have gone with fascist rather than Nazi, you fucking clown.
Are you? I've read every word he ever wrote that's been translated into English. He didn't think the Nazis were some unique phenomenon that could never be repeated. He was ever-conscious and perplexed by the fact that they arose among the so-called 'civilised' Germans. I don't doubt that he would have been making the comparison right now.
 
Fucking idiotic and straight out of the anti semite's playbook. Fascist or fascist adjacent Israel, far right, apartheid, colonialist or genocidal Israel all work to one degree or another. Nazi Israel shows those who use it to be a dick.

As suggested on the main Hamas/Israel thread, this type of trope and other anti semitism deserves a thread where some kind of consensus and self criticism can be reached. If Labour and other institutions can be taken to task for their lack of action/overreaction etc, surely we can look into our own shortcomings?

Getting tired of the canards.
 
Are you? I've read every word he ever wrote that's been translated into English. He didn't think the Nazis were some unique phenomenon that could never be repeated. He was ever-conscious and perplexed by the fact that they arose among the so-called 'civilised' Germans. I don't doubt that he would have been making the comparison right now.
The Israeli government is not National Socialist, which is what you seem to be saying. The Israeli goverment is not anti semitic either (and essential part of what the actual Nazis were about). The details matter here, as does the historical context.

Yes, the Israeli government is an appalling, genocidal, ethno nationalist regime with some fascist characteristics that is doing terrible terrible things against the Palestinian population. Doesn't make it Nazi or Neo Nazi though. However, it is situated somewhere in the wider fascist orbit.

But of course, you may think it sounds clever calling them Nazis. In reality, it makes you sound a bit of a dick (and open to suspicion of being an anti semite by implication).

So, best avoided then, eh.
 
The Israeli government is not National Socialist, which is what you seem to be saying. The Israeli goverment is not anti semitic either (and essential part of what the actual Nazis were about). The details matter here, as does the historical context.

Yes, the Israeli government is an appalling, genocidal, ethno nationalist regime with some fascist characteristics that is doing terrible terrible things against the Palestinian population. Doesn't make it Nazi or Neo Nazi though. However, it is situated somewhere in the wider fascist orbit.

But of course, you may think it sounds clever calling them Nazis. In reality, it makes you sound a bit of a dick (and open to suspicion of being an anti semite by implication).

So, best avoided then, eh.
Would Levi have compared this current regime to the Nazis who put him in Auschwitz? Yes. He really would.
 
It's not nonsense. The current Israeli regime really is that bad, intent upon extermination. And you clearly know little about what Primo Levi thought, as laid out in his writings.
 
Well done. You're an expert on Primo Levy. You're right that the Israeli regime is intent on extermination. While they are undoubtedly far right nasty pieces of work, you're still wrong to describe them as National Socialists (which they are clearly not) for multiple reasons, even though some of the barbaric IDF actions may have similarities to attrocities done by nazis. It doesn't make it anymore right to label them nazis. The only reason I can imagine anyone would do this is because it pleases them to call Jews nazis. Again, please don't do this. It is very damaging to building unity in support of Palestinians.
 
It's not nonsense. The current Israeli regime really is that bad, intent upon extermination. And you clearly know little about what Primo Levi thought, as laid out in his writings.

This is what Primo Levy actually said about Israel...

...on 31 May 1967 Levi gave a speech in the main shul of Turin, his native city. The following words set the tone of the speech and expressed what mattered most to Levi: “Lately words have been [expressed] that we thought were extinct: ‘With the help of God, we will win and we will exterminate our enemy.’ I can’t imagine a worse blasphemy. This is worse than taking [God’s] name in vain – it is calling for his help in a massacre. Are there still people in this world who believe in holy war and equate it with total war?”

Levi reminded everyone Israel, “originating in persecution and massacre” is meant to be a guarantee that “there will be no more persecutions, no more massacres”. No other country is asked “to cease to exist”. Arab armies were preparing for the country’s liquidation.

Levi’s response was Israel “must survive”. Why? Because, like every other country, “it has the right to live”, but, beyond this, “Everyone should remember the generation that created Israel consists almost entirely of people who escaped the massacre of Judaism in Europe… The pioneers of Zionism are the survivors of the tsarist pogroms, of the ghettos, of the mass graves, of Hitler’s lagers. Israel is not like other countries; it is a country to which the whole world is indebted, it is a country of witnesses and martyrs, of the insurgents of Warsaw, of Sobibór, and of Treblinka. The goal of inflicting dispersion and massacre on the survivors of dispersion and massacre is doubly criminal.”

“Israel must live,” he twice reiterated. Policy differences could be discussed and disputed, but there could be no denying the Jewish state’s right to continued existence.


(During the Lebanon war in 1982 he also said, “I retain a close sentimental tie with Israel,” he said, “but not with this Israel”. That's still a long way from calling it nazi).

Article

So he might now call them evil, misguided, traitors to the Jewish experience, murderers, criminals or many other things. But not nazis. He knew quite well what nazis were, well enough I suspect to also know what they aren't.
 
Last edited:
Kamala Harris is a low IQ individual, according to a man who describes himself as a genius

Donald Trump escalated his personal insults against Kamala Harris at a Wednesday evening rally in Georgia as he faces growing scrutiny over reports of his praise of Hitler and alleged sexual misconduct.

“This woman is crazy,” the former president said at an event in the Atlanta suburb of Duluth, hosted by Turning Point USA, a far-right youth group. He said voters should stand up to the vice-president and tell her: “You’re the worst ever. There’s never been anybody like you. You can’t put two sentences together. The world is laughing at us because of you.” He also said that in her recent interview with CBS, she “gave an answer that was from a loony bin”, later adding: “She’s not a smart person. She’s a low IQ individual.”


 
And that seems to be the trouble, even on a thread about Harris, people are focussing on Trump ..

Thats sadly going to be the case, given we are two weeks away from a momentous election that involves the two of them... in fairness, was trying to move the conversation away from the Israel derail.
 
It’s the economy stupid etc
it was clear from the start that that's what would be necessary to out Trump Trump, and when she won her nomination that seemed to be the path she was treading most but its gone out the window as the campaign had rolled on based on the headlines I've seen in my not really paying attention awareness from another country
 
I'm baffled by the switch to just calling Trump names. If saying he's a fascist was going to work (as opposed to encouraging his supporters ever further into sunk cost oppositionist fingers in ears belligerence) it would have done so in 2016.
 
Last edited:
If she loses, it will mainly be due to a burst of inflation in 2022 during the economic bounce back from Covid. Crazy way to get an authoritarian government.
i don't believe that.... Like all Democratic presidential candidates she is too timid and un-reformist, too business as usual
 
I'm baffled by the switch to just calling Trump names. If saying he's a fascist was going to work (as opposed to encouraging his supporters ever further into sunk cost oppositionist fingers in ears belligerence) it would have done so in 2016.
The Dems are finally playing nasty, too late in the day.
 
hmm polls have show trump.expexted turn out has not changed much since rrh last election..

not sure why all undecided voters are suddenly going to vote for trump :hmm:

guy a douch bag more than likely Harris or not vote at all

like Clinton if she lose it down to people not turning out and the both as bad as each other ahit that been doing the rounds since the last election
 
Last edited:
Surely the Trump is a bad guy message has reached saturation point

If you aren’t anti Trump by now then you’ll never be and you’re probably going to vote for him
There was this summary by David Frum (yes, I know) on twatter:
Do you think somebody possibly has video of Trump mocking the handicapped, demeaning US prisoners of war, boasting about sexually assaulting women, praising Vladimir Putin, or urging a violent attack on the US Capitol? That would be huge.
Confessing that he spied on underage girls undressing? Promising to release his tax returns, but never doing it?
Reminiscing fondly about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein?
Publicly fantasizing about "dating" his own daughter?
Imagine if there were video of any of that.
Belittling the mother of a soldier who died in combat for the United States? Congratulating himself that for years he paid no income taxes to the United States? Exulting over swapping "love letters" with the dictator of North Korea? What if any of that was available to view?
Can you imagine if he denied the US citizenship of the first black president? Denounced an Indiana-born judge as untrustworthy because he was "Mexican"? Told a Jewish audience that they were uniquely shrewd with money and loyal only to Israel? What if that were on record?
What if Trump were proven to have paid hush money to a porn star - or to cheating people who enrolled in his scam university - or to defrauding banks who lent money to his company - or were fined half a billion dollars for a rip-off multilevel marketing scheme? Bombshells?
What if Trump raped a woman and then lied about it until he was hit with almost $90 million in damages? What if he stole ultra-secret government documents and shared them with foreign nationals? What if he offered the judge in that 2nd case an appointment as attorney general?
Trump supporters have developed a very robust system of moral immunity. It's very hard to imagine any video more shocking than the material they have already seen, condoned, accepted, and even justified.
Basically, there isn’t really any more dirt to throw at Trump that would have any effect whatsoever, given how he still has mass support despite what is already known.

They’re not voting for him because they think his character has value, they’re voting for him because he pisses off the right kind of people for them. I don’t know how you break that, but it certainly isn’t by screaming about what a threat he is. His people want him to be a threat to the establishment.
 
"guy a douch bag more than likely Harris or not vote at all"

That's a left/center view though, and there's quite a large part of the US non voting pool which isn't. Bear in mind that for most conscious non voters everyone involved is a douche bag. If they stir themselves it'll be to stop perceived bad policy much more than about personalities.
 
Back
Top Bottom