On a related note..
But of course, you are not interested in any of this are you? Because you are not really claiming that I have hidden my ideological position, you simply object to me posting one. As for your objection to my linking to an article. I was simply drawing peoples attention to an article that I agreed with and considered worthy of people reading. Are you really claiming that this is invalid? I have made no claim that the Klein article in question is anything but an opinion piece. So be consistant at least, If your objection is not to the content of the article I quoted but to the fact that I quoted an article at all, then you should object to any poster linking to or quoting any source whatsoever. This is the logic of your argument. You object to any poster drawing attention to any article whatsoever, including news reports (which after all are no less ideological in their perspectives) If we were to follow your logic that would reduce this forum to a list of unsubstantiated, "personal opinions" along the lines of " I think". Is this what you really want? There are indeed other angles and perspectives, and you are free to post them and link to articles that put them forward. I see no reason why I am obliged to do so just to attempt some non existant neutrality.
I wasn't going to bother answering this since dylans nearly disappeared up his own backside writing it and I don't think he could hear me.
But, actually dylans, it wasn't particularly you I had in mind when I posted that this thread was becoming a propaganda thread. Was a specific comment about this thread.
"This is the logic of your argument. You object to any poster drawing attention to any article whatsoever, including news reports (which after all are no less ideological in their perspectives) If we were to follow your logic that would reduce this
forum to a list of unsubstantiated, "personal opinions" along the lines of " I think". Is this what you really want?"
I said thread and you changed it to forum. Cheeky.
I really don't give a damn if you want to have threads where all you post is other people's opinions and soundbites that you agree with. I don't read them, they bore me.
I like threads where people post their own opinions. That stuff you called "a list of unsubstantiated, "personal opinions"" that other people might call a conversation.
Partly because of the logical reasons I just explained to pickmans, but mainly because they are way more interesting.
That doesn't mean that I object to any poster linking to articles... but that just linking to articles kills conversations.
If I was interested in what Gilroy had to say I would read his blog. I'm not.
I might be, however, interested in what you think of him and what he said.
I'm not asking you to be more neutral... I'm telling you that trying to be makes you more believable.
That may not matter to you, but it almost goes without saying that it is no great achievement to be believed by those who want to believe... but to be believed by those who don't... is.