Storm Fox
Trying the find the next noun to verb
While failing to answer the question asked.That's several times you've mocked a poster for their spelling and grammar.
You really are a shitposting loser.
6 years out of it and it shows.
While failing to answer the question asked.That's several times you've mocked a poster for their spelling and grammar.
You really are a shitposting loser.
6 years out of it and it shows.
While failing to answer the question asked.
Oh alright. No I don't think the FBI orchestrated Trump's victory. I do think he once had supporters in the FBI, particularly among the lower ranks, but they were mostly purged or silenced by 2017.
So took about a year of having him as a boss for the scales to fall from eyes thenOh alright. No I don't think the FBI orchestrated Trump's victory. I do think he once had supporters in the FBI, particularly among the lower ranks, but they were mostly purged or silenced by 2017.
Please report any of his extreme thread busting anticsBut then the threads become filled with Dwyer's unanswered bollocks which looks to any new readers like the site agrees with it all. There's a better way to deal with threads being trashed like that
So took about a year of having him as a boss for the scales to fall from eyes then
Okay Bladerunner
That's several times you've mocked a poster for their spelling and grammar.
I detect some rank hypocrisy, double standards and a nice bit of racism at play here. I tend to steer clear of threads that you're posting on because they usually end up with you chastising and labelling someone a racist and or other things, Take the word suprememacist out of your sentence and you're left with a racist insult. There is no argument from me about the suprememacist bit or cunt but why bring race/colour into it? More so when the word racist tends to appear in many of your posts.white supremacist cunt
The word “white” attaches to the word “supremacist”, not the word “cunt”. He is saying that Trump is somebody who believes in the supremacy of white people. He is a white supremacist that is also a cunt.I detect some rank hypocrisy, double standards and a nice bit of racism at play here. I tend to steer clear of threads that you're posting on because they usually end up with you chastising and labelling someone a racist and or other things, Take the word suprememacist out of your sentence and you're left with a racist insult. There is no argument from me about the suprememacist bit or cunt but why bring race/colour into it? More so when the word racist tends to appear in many of your posts.
Going to give you the benefit of the doubt on this, and guess that you're trying to tell us you don't know what a white supremacist is.I detect some rank hypocrisy, double standards and a nice bit of racism at play here. I tend to steer clear of threads that you're posting on because they usually end up with you chastising and labelling someone a racist and or other things, Take the word suprememacist out of your sentence and you're left with a racist insult. There is no argument from me about the suprememacist bit or cunt but why bring race/colour into it? More so when the word racist tends to appear in many of your posts.
The word “white” attaches to the word “supremacist”, not the word “cunt”. He is saying that Trump is somebody who believes in the supremacy of white people. He is a white supremacist that is also a cunt.
Media generally has been influenced in exactly in this way for most of a century - I've personally seen State interventions into newspaper media in which the firm is told not to cover certain stories because it's not in the national interest. This has been as petty as some Royal making a fool of themselves. Social media, which has been around in its pomp for a decade now, has had multiple corruption scandals across the likes of Facebook already, and is no more immune to State influence than more traditional outlets.there's no precedent for social media's current influence on public opinion
Media generally has been influenced in exactly in this way for most of a century - I've personally seen State interventions into newspaper media in which the firm is told not to cover certain stories because it's not in the national interest. This has been as petty as some Royal making a fool of themselves. Social media, which has been around in its pomp for a decade now, has had multiple corruption scandals across the likes of Facebook already, and is no more immune to State influence than more traditional outlets.
This is studied ahistorical naivety on your part because you're trying to convince yourself of a ludicrous position.
Media generally has been influenced in exactly in this way for most of a century
Sure, but internet-based social media is a very different animal. It's reach is much wider.
You should now be detecting a touch of threadbanation.Do I detect a touch of ocastration anxiety here?
I'll be honest and say i've never seen the word used when describing a non white group. I've not seen the use of white before the word supremacist. I just pressumed it was a given that the supremacists were white. I didn't know there was such a thing as a black supremacist or any other type for that matter. My apologies.Going to give you the benefit of the doubt on this, and guess that you're trying to tell us you don't know what a white supremacist is.
I don't know why this post has recieved one of these i pressume it's @NoXions condescending way of saying he doesn't believe me. If so say it and say why instead of acting like a snobbish cunt. Fuck knows why that would make him roll about the floor. I'm being honest.I'll be honest and say i've never seen the word used when describing a non white group. I've not seen the use of white before the word supremacist. I just pressumed it was a given that the supremacists were white. I didn't know there was such a thing as a black supremacist or any other type for that matter. My apologies.
Because that’s how we achieve world peaceWhy is Dwyer banned from the thread?