Does it matter? Why would I (actually WE) need to define a border amongst the blur on the edges of the far left to know they can spew toxic harmful shite? Anymore than WE would need to define the blurs on the edge of the far right to know they can spew toxic harmful shite?
Some people wouldn't care if some elected Republications in office were kicked off of twitter is some algo kicked them off in a quest to get rid of far right racists, yet seem to be against algos to kick off anyone on the far left who is also posting toxic shite.
If you can't recognise that people of all poltiical persausions post harmful content, I don't believe you're engaging this in good faith.
But that's your right. That's the whole point. Humans have a right to lie. Humans have a right to be dishonest.
So I couldnt' give a flying fuck about misinformation from the left or the right. Don't like it? Expose it, challenge it etc.
Or if you want, download some software to filter the shite out.
It's a human right to believe in complete bollocks like 5G mind control, the Earth is flat, the Americans never went to the Moon etc etc etc. I've dealt with such people, they are tedious annoying and
just like SOME on the far left <<< (ETA that wasn't really fair, soz),, they try to use social embarassment to get people to conform to their narrative.
What do you want? To take away human free will?
You'd better get used to people saying things on the net that you really don't like because one day there will be no mechanism to get it taken down and that will work for and against everyone.