I don’t think that’s fair. At the very least, I’m interested in this subject. I think you know that. But what is the purpose of the psychological discourse that is being constructed here, in relation to Musk? That question was actually asked of Aladdin — what is their interpretation of the video? No answer came, other than the vague idea that it is generically interesting to hear him speak.
But if we’re talking psychology, then what are the social representations drawn upon, employed and reproduced through these rhetorical constructions both within the video and created by presenting the video without comment? I am concerned, in the absence of a more clearly defined argument, that this video and its placement in the context of this discussion has the effect of essentialising a kind of predestined template of behaviours. It draws upon and employs a reification of ASD that is linked to some pretty unhelpful stereotypes. As if Musk’s treatment of people as disposable things becomes somehow more forgivable because of it, that there is some kind of pass for his anti-humanism because bless him, didn’t the boy do good? This narrative completely leaves out his development as the scion of an apartheid-era emerald dynasty and it ignores the relevance of his billionaire positioning to his rapid adoption of alt-right rhetoric. It presents an easy and ultimately destructive excuse for the fact that his decisions have ruined people’s lives and he doesn’t care.
You know I have utmost respect for your perspective on these things, though, so I’m very ready to listen if you think I’ve totally picked up the wrong end of the stick.