DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
he must have degenerated fast. Mentally I mean. on other fronts that ship had sailed some time ago
Leicestershire police looking for legal way around this apparently.
“I am extremely worried about the impact the decision not to prosecute him will have on those people, and more widely I am worried about the message this decision sends out to others , both past and present, who have suffered and are suffering sexual abuse.
Not to mention the message it sends out to us all regarding the establishment. There is quite clearly a public interest in prosecuting to prove that it's the same rule for everyone, unless of course he is compltyly mentally shot, but the quote from the police suggests they think otherwise.
Fucking hell! Is this like some Ancient Mariner thing he has to do?Radio 4's 'The World at One', had Uri Geller on defending the CPS decision! But to be fair he does have experience in being the voice of reason when it comes to child abuse allegations against the rich and famous.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
If he does have it & the evidence of his guilt is overwhelming then does the English legal system allow him to be put on trial if he is unable to instruct his defence council, presumably not?
Real issue is that he wasn't prosecuted years ago.
On high are going to in investigate why on high backed off though. See you in 5 years.That's pretty much exactly it: if you're not able to understand what's going on and to instruct counsel, then you're deemed unfit to stand trial. That's fair enough tbh, though whether Janner really is so ga-ga that he can't be tried is perhaps a different matter...
Indeed. Yet another investigation nobbled by orders from on high to back off...
On high are going to in investigate why on high backed off though. See you in 5 years.
They''ve not even began to drag their feet yet, they want to a lord to look at the failing once a new parliament is elected...2019 we'll find that there were failings that would not happen now.Well yes, of course, which is partly why they're dragging their feet about it!
wtf are you on about. How are you even posting here still? Anti-semitic post after anti-semitic post.To be fair to the CPS if they had gone after Brittan and Janner and Keith Joseph previously it would/could have caused a lot of anti Semitic problems. Of course they were are guilty as fuck child abusing filth that needed decades in jail but the potential racist backlash would have caused huge issues. Unfortunately above the law whatever the police may correctly believe.
May they burn in hell.
So, are you saying they shouldn't have gone after Brittan and Janner?To be fair to the CPS if they had gone after Brittan and Janner and Keith Joseph previously it would/could have caused a lot of anti Semitic problems. Of course they were are guilty as fuck child abusing filth that needed decades in jail but the potential racist backlash would have caused huge issues. Unfortunately above the law whatever the police may correctly believe.
May they burn in hell.
He's saying a jew conspiracy based on false claims of pogroms stopped it.So, are you saying they shouldn't have gone after Brittan and Janner?
To be fair to the CPS if they had gone after Brittan and Janner and Keith Joseph previously it would/could have caused a lot of anti Semitic problems. Of course they were are guilty as fuck child abusing filth that needed decades in jail but the potential racist backlash would have caused huge issues. Unfortunately above the law whatever the police may correctly believe.
May they burn in hell.
inshallah no doubt.To be fair to the CPS if they had gone after Brittan and Janner and Keith Joseph previously it would/could have caused a lot of anti Semitic problems. Of course they were are guilty as fuck child abusing filth that needed decades in jail but the potential racist backlash would have caused huge issues. Unfortunately above the law whatever the police may correctly believe.
May they burn in hell.
I think he's suggesting rotherham etc that not prosecuting would be to invite anti-muslim pogroms.That these and and others were drummed up anti-muslim cases. And trying to make a messed up analogical case.What links Brittan, Janner and Joseph are the allegations of child abuse not their ethnicity or religious affiliation...unless you are suggesting that their Jewishness somehow particularly enabled or encouraged the alleged abuse?
Louis MacNeice
That's the Lord Janner who was able to make a speech in the H of L in Feb 2013 and didn't go on leave from the House till Oct 2014.
It's from his wiki, which links to this:What exactly was the October 2014 thing? Perhaps thats when he officially took leave, but I'm pretty sure most publications say he hasn't been to the Lords since police raised his home in December 2013.
.
I feel I'm on slightly dodgy ground with this, people with alzheimers should be able to live life to the full. However, I do find it interesting that, according to the link h took on the Vice-Presidency of the The Jewish Leadership Council in 2010 - a year after his diagnosis.