Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

How much evidence is there of long term high level UK paedophile ring?

All those medals, all those honoury positions, all those places on the board... what to do about them, get rid now or wait 6 months? New headed notepaper anyone?
 
Put Greville Janner into google news and get only one result - could this forgetting be spreading....



Hes a very powerful individual. Close links to MI6.




In 1994, Frank Beck died in Whitemoor prison whilst serving a staggering 5 life sentences for alleged child abuse.
Frank Beck had been implicated in the abuse of boys in Leicestershire care homes.
Frank Beck had always maintained his innocence and claimed he was imprisoned because he’d exposed alleged abuse by a high-profile politician.
Frank Beck was appealing against his conviction and sentence.
Leave to appeal and legal aid were granted in January 1993 and Anthony Scrivener QC, one of Britain’s most eminent lawyers and former chairman of the Bar, agreed to take the case.
Frank Beck’s solicitor said at the time of his death
‘He was very impatient for the appeal to go ahead. His death came out of the blue. Normally the case would lapse and die with him but his family and close friends are discussing the possibility of carrying on with the appeal. This would not be unprecedented.’
Beck was convinced there was enough new evidence and material that was not put before the original court due to non-disclosure by the prosecution which would have made the original conviction unsafe and proved his innocence.’
In 2011 the following anonymous comments were left on a blog which was discussing his death:


In 1991, after accusing Janner of paedophilic behaviour with a teenager, Frank Beck was arrested and charged with the sexual and physical abuse of children in his care over a thirteen-year period.
At his trial Beck stated that: – “One child has been buggered and abused for two solid years by Greville Janner
“.



Shortly afterwards, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alan Green, let it be known that “for lack of evidence”, Janner would not be prosecuted, even though Paul Winston, who was just thirteen when he and Janner first met, was able to describe Janner‘s home, the hotel rooms they had shared, and Janner’s habits and person
 
Last edited:
Are you talking about Janner? If so, then no - all that's been mentioned is what has been reported by mainstream media and acknowledged by Janner's reps. If you mean someone else then who/where - and why?
Just that in reading the thread I have come across the names of a lot of prominent living people, usually via links and I wonder if it might open U75 up for legal action?
 
Just that in reading the thread I have come across the names of a lot of prominent living people, usually via links and I wonder if it might open U75 up for legal action?
If for example, you mean 'the list', yes some sailing close to the wind (but generally not naming living persons). However its existence was discussed in the mainstream a while ago. Other sites have it in full.
 
Frank Beck was a seriously nasty piece of work but there is not a single mention of Janner in the Wiki article plus the talk section is empty which is surprising for an article of this length and prominence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Beck_(sex_offender)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Frank_Beck_(sex_offender)

mirror0312911.jpg
 
To be honest I've no idea how wiki edits work. It looked to me as if the Beck pages bein edited in the last few days was significant, but I've a looked at a few other random pages and they also have pretty recent edits.
 
To be honest I've no idea how wiki edits work. It looked to me as if the Beck pages bein edited in the last few days was significant, but I've a looked at a few other random pages and they also have pretty recent edits.

Could just be general edit noise - that said no mainstream sources other than the Mirror seem to have carried the story - in particular the Telegraph which has been trailing Westminster paedophile stories along with the Mail zilch which makes me smell a very big rat.

Edit - the story has now gone from the Mirror website.

2nd edit - the name Janner has been removed from the article - hence I couldn't find it by search.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/labour-peer-escapes-probe-over-3836213#.U72629iy_Dl.twitter
 
It didn't say Janner to begin with mate - though they made it as clear as possible who they meant.

I'm not sure as I found the article by using search term "Janner" in google news and looking for the last 24 hours results - maybe when you read it it had been edited.
 
Could just be general edit noise - that said no mainstream sources other than the Mirror seem to have carried the story - in particular the Telegraph which has been trailing Westminster paedophile stories along with the Mail zilch which makes me smell a very big rat.

Edit - the story has now gone from the Mirror website.

2nd edit - the name Janner has been removed from the article - hence I couldn't find it by search.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/labour-peer-escapes-probe-over-3836213#.U72629iy_Dl.twitter
it's ok, you can rely on the mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-inquiry-historic-child-sex-abuse-claims.html
 
Back
Top Bottom