Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Griffin and BNP strategy

Nazi boy's at it again:

Mark Collett, the BNP's publicity director, created a spoof of the Pac-Man computer game with the caption "Sortin' out Muslims since 1980" and has uploaded it to a number of websites.

The image, which shows caricatures of Muslim women in veils being attacked by the computer character, is accompanied by a personal message from Collett on his Facebook page.

He wrote: "Pac-Man knows how to deal with Muslims! I made this, I hope it makes you all smile! Feel free to send it out and spread the joy."

Here
 
I'm not generally over enthusiastic about intellectual property, but I hope Namco sue him into a blackhole. Collet says it is "a joke", but seeing as he is flogging T Shirts with this stolen design I doubt the lawyers will see it that way.
 
First time out in Halewood South, Knowlesy - picked up 1% in the gen area in the GE. 8.6% for Tony 'it's hammer time' Ward last night. The United Socialist Party who had been steadily building a good vote collapsed. Interesting in the wider picture that this is a labour win (gain even) on an increased vote combined with a falling turnout.

Allan Harvey Labour 607 - 46.0%
Tommy Morretta Liberal Democrat 486 - 36.8%
Tony Ward British National Party 113 - 8.6%
Carl Robert Cross Conservative 32 - 2.4%
Eric Arthur McIntosh TUSP 52 - 3.9%
Andy Thompson Independent 30 - 2.3%

Turnout: 23.06%
 
Doncaster MBC, Rossington
Thursday 19 November 2009 12:00

Lab 637 (26.9; +1.1)
Others 1553 (65.6; +5.3) (English Democrats 551, 3 Independents 506 / 420 / 76 )
BNP 101 (4.3; +4.3)
LD Robert Mitchell 78 (3.3; +3.3)
[Con (0.0; -13.9)]
Majority 86
Turnout 24.6%
Lab gain from Ind.
Percentage change is since May 2008.


This could be a BNP 1st time out (i do not know) in an area with a fascist mayor:eek:

Interesting result here from this former pit village. English democrats vastly outscored BNP as did the independents.
 
Looks to me that the good EDP vote was in part due to the non-fascist mayor working out a deal with his tory mates for them not to stand for the first time in decades and the normal 3-400 or so tories simply switching vote as well as the EDP's ongoing attempts at building a bases proving at least as successful as the BNP's.
 
Looks to me that the good EDP vote was in part due to the non-fascist mayor working out a deal with his tory mates for them not to stand for the first time in decades and the normal 3-400 or so tories simply switching vote as well as the EDP's ongoing attempts at building a bases proving at least as successful as the BNP's.

I thought he was a fascist Apron, or certainly had fascist pedigree. Have you a link which gives information?
 
For anyone who does care, the donny mayor is Peter Davies - a former Labour Party, tory party and UKIP member - currently in the English democrats. You all know the type, far right, FA, rah rah britain etc. His son is a current tory MP. He's a prat, but he's not a fascist.
 
For anyone who does care, the donny mayor is Peter Davies - a former Labour Party, tory party and UKIP member - currently in the English democrats. You all know the type, far right, FA, rah rah britain etc. His son is a current tory MP. He's a prat, but he's not a fascist.

Thankyou. Though providing your opinion with everything gets tiresome for some readers, I asked for independent information without prejeudice preferably, so people can make up their own minds.
 
On electoral matters- BNP still saying 200 candiDtes for the General election in 2010 of this 23 in Scotland and 20 in South East ( which in their regional organisation means counties to south and west of London)

A few details about one are they have annouced where they stand- east midlands- as an indicator of where they will expand to in general election terms. In addition to the seats covering towns such as Boston, Ilkeston, Heanor and Coalville - fighting Leicester West, Nottingham North, Derby North and Northampton North - all of the big regionals cities. Also fighting Grantham, Kettering and Loughborough
 
Rossington 09
Richard Lawrence Cooper-Holmes - Labour - 637 votes
John Cooke - Independent - 506 votes
Mick Cooper - English Democrats - 551 votes
Terry Wilde - Independent - 420 votes
Dave Owen - British National Party - 101 votes
Robert Mitchell - Liberal Democrats - 78 votes
George Sheldon - Independent - 76 votes


and 08 ROSSINGTON
Jackie Clark (In) 1,368
John Quinn (L) 822
John Cooke (NP) 551
Kathleen Beard (C) 442
No change


and 07

"LABOUR re-took one of its traditional strongholds when the Community Group's John Cooke lost his Rossington seat.
Rossington: Andrea Milner* (Lab) - 1,049; John Cooke (Community Group) - 758; Terry Wilde (ind) - 741; Kathleen Margaret Beard (Con) - 320; George Sheldon (Ind) - 217. "

and mayor election Peter Davies (English Democrats) 16961
Stuart Exelby (Community Group) 2152
Michael Felse (Independent) 2051
Sandra Holland (Labour) 16549
Mick Maye (Independent) 17150
Dave Owen (BNP) 8175
Jonathan Wood (Conservative) 12198
 
I know Terry Wilde, he is a really decent guy, lots of integrity, i hate to say it but it looks like Labour are on the up. They are i imagine, now sending the 'right signals'to the WWC, established BEM's, etc.
 
I have done some calculations with evidence gleaned from the Association of Liberal Democratic councillors website.

They report 101 wards have been contested since 27th August 2009 up to the 26th of November 2009.

The BNP stood in 21 wards, their average % in these wards was 10.576% However if you minus the Boston case, as an exceptional case (a large vote was split between everybody in this case) then their average vote is 9.22%.

The average BNP vote cast spread over all 101 wards is 2.199%.

The BNP did NOT contest SIX wards where they had stood before, which is a high drop out/turnover rate, of approx 25% of the 27 wards where the BNP have had some presence.

If you count these wards with the 21 wards they stood in, then their vote has risen .4%. Again, minusing the exceptional Boston case where their vote was artificially inflated then their voting trend is DOWNWARDS, -0.2423%. Which is an interesting statistic.
 
I have done some calculations with evidence gleaned from the Association of Liberal Democratic councillors website.

They report 101 wards have been contested since 27th August 2009 up to the 26th of November 2009.

The BNP stood in 21 wards, their average % in these wards was 10.576% However if you minus the Boston case, as an exceptional case (a large vote was split between everybody in this case) then their average vote is 9.22%.

The average BNP vote cast spread over all 101 wards is 2.199%.

The BNP did NOT contest SIX wards where they had stood before, which is a high drop out/turnover rate, of approx 25% of the 27 wards where the BNP have had some presence.

If you count these wards with the 21 wards they stood in, then their vote has risen .4%. Again, minusing the exceptional Boston case where their vote was artificially inflated then their voting trend is DOWNWARDS, -0.2423%. Which is an interesting statistic.

what exactly is the point of calculating their average vote by including wards where they haven't stood? Or have I misunderstood?
 
"what exactly is the point of calculating their average vote by including wards where they haven't stood? Or have I misunderstood?"
The point is so you can say look their vote is both tiny and plummeting. It's propoganda not analysis.

No. Your 'answer' does not make sense. The plummeting part is the vote in 27 wards where they have stood before and are standing, areas where they supposedly have 'strength'. So to give a real assesment of the BNP vote you include those wards where they have stood previously and where they are not now. Those lost wards and lost votes ARE weakness, and it is propaganda and not analysis to pretend otherwise (only non scientific idiots would do that - Bye bye Butchers block).
 
Back
Top Bottom