Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Grenfell Tower fire in North Kensington - news and discussion

iirc £6,000 in savings and benefits starts to taper off at that point (assuming you are on income based rather than contributions based) - that was for JSA a few years ago, probably different for Universal Credit.
In any case, if they receive the cash and spend it it won't deny them benefits. I suppose it might be counted as income and have their benefits reduced/stopped for a month but I don't think it'd make them ineligible - definitely something for anyone who is claiming to watch out for though.
As far as im aware compensation from something like this would go into some kind of trust fund (solicitors will sort it out) and shouldnt affect benefits. This is how it works for victims of historical child abuse and victims of more recent sexual offences. So cant see why the same principles shouldnt apply, but im not 100% certain.
 
It's strange that the fire in a flat on the fourth floor was put out by LFB who then left the building by which time flames were visible on the outside of the building. This suggests the fire has somehow travelled unseen along a ceiling cavity or beneath the floorboards connected to the fourth floor flat.

It is known that the 2015/16 refurbishment involved the temporary removal of firestopping materials between the floors to enable the installation of new boilers. It is unclear whether these materials were replaced which, though speculation, might explain the "now you see it now you don't" manner in which the fire spread beyond it's initial source.

On a separate point, looking at the top picture in Cid's post, it's impressive how the 1974 fluted concrete columns appear relatively undamaged while pretty much everything that was added in 2015/16 is charred beyond recognition.

Several reports have said the fridge fire had spread to the cladding through the kitchen window, the firefighters in the kitchen weren't aware of this when they put the fridge fire out. As the fire outside engulfed most the block in just 30 minutes, it re-entered the building on various floors via open windows, then into other flats as closed windows gave up the ghost.

Other things may have been going on inside too, but the fire outside & it re-entering the building at various stages would appear to have been the main issue.
 
All this amateur armseat detective work is a bit distasteful, no?
depends if you think that we should wait 5 years for the results of an official inquiry before taking action* or sus things out now so that pressure can be applied in the right places to ensure that whatever caused this is stopped from happening on new installations, and identified and rectified on existing tower blocks as soon as possible.

Most of the information needed to work this out is available in the public domain, this is just a useful way of collating it, verifying it and getting additional opinions.

* or more likely brushing it under the carpet and doing sfa about it.
 
All this amateur armseat detective work is a bit distasteful, no?
Dunno really. Can't say I've read all the technical stuff on this thread, but it all looks to be lined up at answering the question of how the residents were let down. Haven't seen anything too prurient. All fine lines of course, but urban's discussions have been respectful as far as I've seen.
 
depends if you think that we should wait 5 years for the results of an official inquiry before taking action* or sus things out now so that pressure can be applied in the right places to ensure that whatever caused this is stopped from happening on new installations, and identified and rectified on existing tower blocks as soon as possible.

* or more likely brushing it under the carpet and doing sfa about it.
surely there will be independent investigators appointed by residents' lawyers who will be doing all this. you don't have access to all the facts/data, so your own investigation will be of limited value.
i dunno. i felt like this about the amanda knox discussion on here too. it's sits uneasily with me.
 

Hmmm...

The 68 flats have been bought by the City of London Corporation as part of the response to the tragedy, and handed to Kensington & Chelsea Council for social housing.

They will provide “longer-term accommodation” as 250 residents affected are currently being housed in hotels around the area.

This figure includes residents from surrounding blocks too?

Why have the CoLC done this?

Also I fucking hate the ES...sensationalist, hate mongering wankers.
 
surely there will be independent investigators appointed by residents' lawyers who will be doing all this. you don't have access to all the facts/data, so your own investigation will be of limited value.
i dunno. i felt like this about the amanda knox discussion on here too. it's sits uneasily with me.
everything we do here is of limited value but the true urbanite doesn't let that stop them.
 
surely there will be independent investigators appointed by residents' lawyers who will be doing all this. you don't have access to all the facts/data, so your own investigation will be of limited value.
i dunno. i felt like this about the amanda knox discussion on here too. it's sits uneasily with me.
Most inquiries are, as Sir Paul argued, ‘quick political fixes’ in response to urgent pressures, like the Hutton report after the death of Dr David Kelly or the Leveson inquiry after the revelations about the hacking of Milly Dowler’s phone. After the initial announcement, inquiries have several purposes. They serve as political theatre with high-profile witnesses, while occasionally finding out something new and providing lessons which can be learnt in future.
The role of public inquiries
 
not really an option is it? The thread isn't just a receptacle for amateur columbo work, it's also a thread for discussion about a hugely significant ongoing situation.

It is an option if you think that this thread on the whole is 'amateur columbo work'. I don't think it is. Surely the way to keep it sensible and informative is to focus on the sensible and informative stuff.
 
so what? you really think you can personally solve this when you don't have all of the facts? this is not a mystery novel ffs
It's a basic fire engineering issue involving a mix of building materials and installation techniques and regulations, for which virtually all the relevant information is in the public domain.

I think I mentioned earlier that my dad is a professor of combustion engineering who's taught fire engineering to a good proportion of the countries fire officers, and's working up a report on this. He's just not so good at scouring the internet to obtain info that's public domain, nor does he have experience on the installation side of things which some on this thread appear to have (and I do to a more limited extent).

If you're not interested in anything I post on this then feel free to not read it - use the ignore function if you want.

Leave it to the experts is one thing, but leave it to a politically stitched up public inquiry...... sorry, but I can't agree with that.
 
Back
Top Bottom