Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Goldsmiths University Diversity officer facing sack

Should she be sacked?

  • Yes she should

    Votes: 71 53.4%
  • No she should not

    Votes: 32 24.1%
  • Official warning

    Votes: 7 5.3%
  • Attention seeking option

    Votes: 23 17.3%

  • Total voters
    133
oh yeah, I could make an argument out of that if I was one who argues without honesty or real feeling. I'm getting the impression everyone on this show deserves the salt mines just by thinking about it.
Many of those examples - eg sacking pregnant employees - are, fucking sadly, commonplace.
 
Sorry i'm lost, either there's a grammatical issue in your statement or i'm not comprehending

you got a convo with eg when you both worked out that you were coming from having objections to the same shit.

andy got called a cunt, for well, being a cunt. because he was trying to pull the stunt that eg has misinterpreted your comment as
 
you got a convo with eg when you both worked out that you were coming from having objections to the same shit.

andy got called a cunt, for well, being a cunt. because he was trying to pull the stunt that eg has misinterpreted your comment as

oh.

I'm new to arguing with people on the internet.
 
In that case you're probably not aware that it's customary to send me your deposit as a surety against future swear-box fines and other deductions then. You seem quite polite so fifty quid should cover it.

This is really off-topic








PM your card details (incl. security code etc for sure) and i'll get you 100 to be safe
 
sure, but a new poster can't be expected to know what a long term poster has posted in the past

Hence pointing them in the direction of her posting history I guess.

There are things I expect posters to have learned about me from my time on here, that I no longer feel the need to make explicit regularly. I guess new posters might not know those things (that I take as read). Oh well.
 
Never in life has anyone with a firm belief in a given principle ever said anything that undermined that principle. Ever.
 
So now you're suggesting that being harassed by people at work means you can later overreact to a perfectly reasonable question here, of the sort which you yourself have asked many times. Would you like to explain how that works?

I merely expressed my opinion, mostly to support MiB who was being attacked by more than just you, and you've chosen not to simply say, OK, two sides to this, other opinions are permissible, but instead to go into full on outrage mode.

You really do yourself no favours and provide more ammo for those who want to attack you given any opportunity, justified or not (and that doesn't include either me or MiB).
I suggest you stop trying to dictate how I react, or even suggesting I am not allowed to react. Shades of 'be a good girl, don't make a scene ' - your attitude is appalling.
 

You have previously described named disabled students as puppets and sneered at evidence of their grievance, whilst providing none of your own for your alternative narrative at that level . It works at the external level of that I have no problem, but not at the internal level. You are spinning for a shower of shits with a right-on veneer.
 
I suggest you stop trying to dictate how I react, or even suggesting I am not allowed to react. Shades of 'be a good girl, don't make a scene ' - your attitude is appalling.

Fuck off, that's a complete and utter misrepresentation.

I expressed an opinion (clearly stated as an opinion) that I thought you had overreacted, and you immediately came back with
Oh please go away.

I don't doubt you have people telling you how to react or even that you're not allowed to react, and that you're totally sick of it, but that doesn't justify you in assuming that everyone is doing that everywhere and all the time, on the basis of precisely fuck all, and then getting increasingly aggressive and dishonest in your portrayal of what's happened if someone doesn't immediately back down.

That's what's "appalling", in my opinion.
 
Fuck off, that's a complete and utter misrepresentation.

I expressed an opinion (clearly stated as an opinion) that I thought you had overreacted, and you immediately came back with


I don't doubt you have people telling you how to react or even that you're not allowed to react, and that you're totally sick of it, but that doesn't justify you in assuming that everyone is doing that everywhere and all the time, on the basis of precisely fuck all, and then getting increasingly aggressive and dishonest in your portrayal of what's happened if someone doesn't immediately back down.

That's what's "appalling", in my opinion.
why shouldn't she say pls go away? if equationgirl has one fault it is her great courtesy. i'd have told you to go forth and multiply.
 
Fuck off, that's a complete and utter misrepresentation.

I expressed an opinion (clearly stated as an opinion) that I thought you had overreacted, and you immediately came back with


I don't doubt you have people telling you how to react or even that you're not allowed to react, and that you're totally sick of it, but that doesn't justify you in assuming that everyone is doing that everywhere and all the time, on the basis of precisely fuck all, and then getting increasingly aggressive and dishonest in your portrayal of what's happened if someone doesn't immediately back down.

That's what's "appalling", in my opinion.
No it isn't a misrepresentation, a misrepresentation would be to call you a raving misogynist.

your post came across to me and at least one other poster on this thread as I described.
 
Back
Top Bottom