Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Goldsmiths University Diversity officer facing sack

Should she be sacked?

  • Yes she should

    Votes: 71 53.4%
  • No she should not

    Votes: 32 24.1%
  • Official warning

    Votes: 7 5.3%
  • Attention seeking option

    Votes: 23 17.3%

  • Total voters
    133
There was an interesting article on the sex spectrum (as opposed to the gender spectrum) in nature not long ago (may be behind paywall). It's well worth a read and interesting in that it points out that gender identity is often formed around the age of 3 (in the context of the article after most people with disorders of sex development - DSDs - have been assigned a sex). It's not clear how DSDs relate to gender identity, I'd be hesitant to infer anything from that, but it is interesting food for thought in that context.
I met an intersex person in March and we had exactly this conversation. He was born male but with some "disorders" that were operated on while he was a baby. He was brought up as male and then a little bit later the decision was taken to operate again to make him appear female and to put him through a female puberty. Now he has the appearance of a woman but is still anatomically male - and identifies as male. He now campaigns very successfully to stop such surgery on intersex children.

We compared experiences of gender identity and found there was a lot of common ground between us. It does seem that the gender dysphoria in intersex people is the same as in trans people and my intersex friend agreed that some trans people, maybe all, may well be on an intersex spectrum given that our scientific knowledge of this area is still so basic.
 
Last edited:
:D

Why doesn't this surprise me. 2 years from defending witty (read: posh boy ironic) racist comments about black vaginas to this.

The privileged middle class will always know which side to fall back on.

Some of the comments on there are unbelievable. Apparently anyone who doesn't support Bahar isn't left wing and everyone in the UK is racist. Student politics is really fucked up.
 
There was an interesting article on the sex spectrum (as opposed to the gender spectrum) in nature not long ago (may be behind paywall). It's well worth a read and interesting in that it points out that gender identity is often formed around the age of 3 (in the context of the article after most people with disorders of sex development - DSDs - have been assigned a sex). It's not clear how DSDs relate to gender identity, I'd be hesitant to infer anything from that, but it is interesting food for thought in that context.
That's really interesting.
 
...
edit: cis is a latin word, in latin it's the antonym for trans. It's been used in chemistry historically so I've learnt on this thread, seems like a wanky academic made up word but actually it's got a certain rightness to it, being derived from language rather than anything gender/sex/biologically based. I really like it as a word for this usage.

I've never studied chemistry, but "cis" also occurs in the usage "cisalpine Gaul" as opposed to "transalpine Gaul", and I've never studied history either, except at school, (and didn't even do "O" Grade), which suggests to me that really must be quite a well-known usage.
 
There was an interesting article on the sex spectrum (as opposed to the gender spectrum) in nature not long ago (may be behind paywall). It's well worth a read and interesting in that it points out that gender identity is often formed around the age of 3 (in the context of the article after most people with disorders of sex development - DSDs - have been assigned a sex). It's not clear how DSDs relate to gender identity, I'd be hesitant to infer anything from that, but it is interesting food for thought in that context.
not behind a paywall here http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/jmsierra/documents/Ainsworth2015Nat.pdf
 
Some of the comments on there are unbelievable. Apparently anyone who doesn't support Bahar isn't left wing and everyone in the UK is racist. Student politics is really fucked up.

everyone except UKIP, who only object to mostly white eastern european immigration and therefore can't be racist
 
the most significant act of racism I've seen in the last few years was a black guy screaming at a white family from somewhere in Eastern Europe to fuck off and that they'd destroyed this country etc. That's not to elevate one act of individual racism abovet structural racism, but to acknowledge that scarcity and hence competition for resources, amongst working class people, is part of the architecture of structural racism, it's not some mystical thing that white people do but a structural and exploitable component of class relations.
 
not at all - but you can't ignore the prefix as there will be times that you may specifically need to refer to trans or cis. I thought I'd explained this tbh.

But my point is not everyone identifies as male or female. I know a few people that don't - so its a wrong assumption.

Unfortunately, the prefix isn't often added in the media because binarism is the preferred default position of those in power. This has tended to mean that some of those that are aware of the distinctions are the very people suppressing those distinctions, which just makes the fight to naturalise (in a discursive sense) the prefixes more difficult.
 
With full proportional representation the Virtuous Pagans would have got about 27 seats. And despite losing in Thanet, the Wrath and Sullenness Party would have got about 70.
 
why say non trans when we have cis? :confused:


also - non trans doesn't cut it - there are many different genders that do not identify as cis or trans. 'Non trans' denies their existence!
In general I think we should avoid adding new jargon terms unnecessarily. But your point about people who don't identify as either cis or trans is a good one. Although I wonder if cis and trans don't do the same thing. Don't they suggest a binary?
 
In general I think we should avoid adding new jargon terms unnecessarily. But your point about people who don't identify as either cis or trans is a good one. Although I wonder if cis and trans don't do the same thing. Don't they suggest a binary?
as the late great tj hooker said, there is no black and white, there are a million shades of grey.
 
Which circle is urban?
Tent1_fundraising.jpg
 
There was an interesting article on the sex spectrum (as opposed to the gender spectrum) in nature not long ago (may be behind paywall). It's well worth a read and interesting in that it points out that gender identity is often formed around the age of 3 (in the context of the article after most people with disorders of sex development - DSDs - have been assigned a sex). It's not clear how DSDs relate to gender identity, I'd be hesitant to infer anything from that, but it is interesting food for thought in that context.

I think we need to be careful about being too firm on the idea that gender identity is fixed around the age of 3.

From what i've read, at the age of 3, children are usually aware of their body and begin to understand that they can't change their body at will.
And at that age children start to become very interested in the social rules that they observe around them, and often see these as hard rules (and of course, they will have noticed the strict binary gender roles being imposed on them and all around them).

However, I don't think its correct to say that children who can't fit themselves into this binary and find it too puzzling, or who think they belong on the other side to what is expected on them at age 3 will always identify in this way throughout childhood and adulthood, or that children who do identify themselves with their expected gender at age 3 won't change their minds sometime later. This doesn't ring true with my childhood experience or the experiences of some other people i've spoken to. People can be very confused about gender as children but later be happy to be just gender non-conforming; and some people who don't remember "knowing" they were different to what was expected of them at the age of 3 develop gender dysphoria at some later point and go on to transition.
 
Who on earth identifies with their gender, assigned or not, from birth?

Babies don't have a gender identity apart from the one stuck on them by observers.
to be clear then for pedants - idenitfying with gender that was assigned from birth not identifying from birth with their assigned gender.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom