Can you C&P the column please? It let me read it!
sorry, don't have it, was trusting chilango's word
Can you C&P the column please? It let me read it!
I met an intersex person in March and we had exactly this conversation. He was born male but with some "disorders" that were operated on while he was a baby. He was brought up as male and then a little bit later the decision was taken to operate again to make him appear female and to put him through a female puberty. Now he has the appearance of a woman but is still anatomically male - and identifies as male. He now campaigns very successfully to stop such surgery on intersex children.There was an interesting article on the sex spectrum (as opposed to the gender spectrum) in nature not long ago (may be behind paywall). It's well worth a read and interesting in that it points out that gender identity is often formed around the age of 3 (in the context of the article after most people with disorders of sex development - DSDs - have been assigned a sex). It's not clear how DSDs relate to gender identity, I'd be hesitant to infer anything from that, but it is interesting food for thought in that context.
Why doesn't this surprise me. 2 years from defending witty (read: posh boy ironic) racist comments about black vaginas to this.
The privileged middle class will always know which side to fall back on.
That's really interesting.There was an interesting article on the sex spectrum (as opposed to the gender spectrum) in nature not long ago (may be behind paywall). It's well worth a read and interesting in that it points out that gender identity is often formed around the age of 3 (in the context of the article after most people with disorders of sex development - DSDs - have been assigned a sex). It's not clear how DSDs relate to gender identity, I'd be hesitant to infer anything from that, but it is interesting food for thought in that context.
...
edit: cis is a latin word, in latin it's the antonym for trans. It's been used in chemistry historically so I've learnt on this thread, seems like a wanky academic made up word but actually it's got a certain rightness to it, being derived from language rather than anything gender/sex/biologically based. I really like it as a word for this usage.
not behind a paywall here http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/jmsierra/documents/Ainsworth2015Nat.pdfThere was an interesting article on the sex spectrum (as opposed to the gender spectrum) in nature not long ago (may be behind paywall). It's well worth a read and interesting in that it points out that gender identity is often formed around the age of 3 (in the context of the article after most people with disorders of sex development - DSDs - have been assigned a sex). It's not clear how DSDs relate to gender identity, I'd be hesitant to infer anything from that, but it is interesting food for thought in that context.
Some of the comments on there are unbelievable. Apparently anyone who doesn't support Bahar isn't left wing and everyone in the UK is racist. Student politics is really fucked up.
everyone except UKIP, who only object to mostly white eastern european immigration and therefore can't be racist
There's nothing on the libcom forums that I can see. Is it just twitter?I really don't trust these people
There's nothing on the libcom forums that I can see. Is it just twitter?
Oh right. Worse than twitter then.
we're purgatory.Which circle is urban?
Except when the 501s are happening - and then we're limbo.we're purgatory.
501s are jeans. you mean 502s.Except when the 501s are happening - and then we're limbo.
Yes, those501s are jeans. you mean 502s.
not at all - but you can't ignore the prefix as there will be times that you may specifically need to refer to trans or cis. I thought I'd explained this tbh.
But my point is not everyone identifies as male or female. I know a few people that don't - so its a wrong assumption.
Stupid question but what is wrong with trans and not-trans. Which is what I would have used before I heard the word cis.
In general I think we should avoid adding new jargon terms unnecessarily. But your point about people who don't identify as either cis or trans is a good one. Although I wonder if cis and trans don't do the same thing. Don't they suggest a binary?why say non trans when we have cis?
also - non trans doesn't cut it - there are many different genders that do not identify as cis or trans. 'Non trans' denies their existence!
as the late great tj hooker said, there is no black and white, there are a million shades of grey.In general I think we should avoid adding new jargon terms unnecessarily. But your point about people who don't identify as either cis or trans is a good one. Although I wonder if cis and trans don't do the same thing. Don't they suggest a binary?
Which circle is urban?
There was an interesting article on the sex spectrum (as opposed to the gender spectrum) in nature not long ago (may be behind paywall). It's well worth a read and interesting in that it points out that gender identity is often formed around the age of 3 (in the context of the article after most people with disorders of sex development - DSDs - have been assigned a sex). It's not clear how DSDs relate to gender identity, I'd be hesitant to infer anything from that, but it is interesting food for thought in that context.
Someone who identifies with their *assigned* gender from birth would be more accurate
to be clear then for pedants - idenitfying with gender that was assigned from birth not identifying from birth with their assigned gender.Who on earth identifies with their gender, assigned or not, from birth?
Babies don't have a gender identity apart from the one stuck on them by observers.