It appears some anti-vaxxers have been pulling some bullshit where they show people shaking 'as a result of the vaccine'. However I can see relatively few of their messages on twitter because the phrase 'thanks Pfizer' has instead been hijacked by rather a lot of people taking the piss out of them.
Just one example:
that's just meanAnd, to be fair, quite a lot of people with medical knowledge pointing out exactly why the symptoms being performed cannot be genuine.
I have never used similar symptoms to freak out dopehead friends of mine as a teenager, no siree I haven'tAnd, to be fair, quite a lot of people with medical knowledge pointing out exactly why the symptoms being performed cannot be genuine.
Well at least I've got one thing in common with him these days. The lack of focus on excess deaths has been an utter disgrace. And Whittys statins explanation was worthy of mocking if taken in isolation (though its not such a hideous point if its just taken as being one of numerous factors, all worthy of drawing attention to)."Doctor" John Campbell strikes again ...
"The atrocities committed by our government"
And this from last year. Wow. What a fucking cunt (From Mail, hence screengrab)
View attachment 360698
Aaah, thought he'd been locked out of all that.He's a regular on Sky Sports (or at least if he's not it's because they kicked him off after he started with this shit). He's definitely not cut out of that.
but with an added twist - those radicalised by the far right had (wrong and horrific) arguments, somewhat based in reality. not right at all, but with actual tangible conceptional things such as skin colour, nationalism, identity, class, etc. i.e. they were extrapolating (wrongly) from their own perceptions, i.e. "i don't like teh way my town has gone, only white person on the bus" etc. so whilst this is a horrible, wrong, inhumane argument, reality can meet reality somewhat. "why don't you like these people? What is it that makes them different? Are they human beings to you? What does class and power have to do with you argument?" there is actual grounds for a discussion. I have over teh years actually had this with talk with racists, and it's a two way thing, and i have seen shifts and changes, some ditching the mentality all together. It's possible.This is how people are radicalised, and I use that word deliberately. People who feel lost, who know they have gaps in their knowledge but prefer easy answers to sitting down to learn, people who society haven't protected or guided. Le Tissier probably doesn't really understand what he's blathering about; he just feels lost because the gang of post-football names doing the TV studios and after dinner circuit doesn't include him so he's found a group of "friends" who seem to like having him around.
It's so dangerous. How many young lads did we lose to the BNP? The EDL? Same terms. Same easy solutions. Same "look over there" mentality.
I usually point out that if Icke and Jones et al are such a threat to the rulers of the world then why are they still alive where others have perished and leave it at that. Either a penny will drop or it won't.Also an interesting thing is that once you're into the conspiritoral view, it's almost impossible to concede anything, because any concession, such as "the media, though powerful adn run by elites, are not in on it" then the entire world view falls down. Why wouldn't the lizards whip the media in line? any concession means the whole thing crumbles. So they are extremists in the truest sense.
I see merit in the "lost, lonely. traumatised, disimpowered" argument, especially disimpowerment - and that probably explains many of those who get radicalised by this horse shit. But I alway see merit in the "arrogant, narcissistic, vain, with an incredibly over-inflated sense of one's own intellectual and knowledge ability" argument too. i know it's all a bit simplistic, but i still think there's a certain almost incompherensive arrogance and hubris to many of them. Too special for lockdowns, to0 logical and all-seeing to believe in the nonesense churned out by scientists at Harvard, Imperial, the NHS, etc.This is how people are radicalised, and I use that word deliberately. People who feel lost, who know they have gaps in their knowledge but prefer easy answers to sitting down to learn, people who society haven't protected or guided. Le Tissier probably doesn't really understand what he's blathering about; he just feels lost because the gang of post-football names doing the TV studios and after dinner circuit doesn't include him so he's found a group of "friends" who seem to like having him around.
It's so dangerous. How many young lads did we lose to the BNP? The EDL? Same terms. Same easy solutions. Same "look over there" mentality.
That very well describes a fair amount of people who post to these forums from my experience, and I'd just add generally unpleasant and that they chat a load of absolute shit half the time.arrogant, narcissistic, vain, with an incredibly over-inflated sense of one's own intellectual and knowledge ability . . . there's a certain almost incompherensive arrogance and hubris to many of them.
That very well describes a fair amount of people who post to these forums from my experience, and I'd just add generally unpleasant and that they chat a load of absolute shit half the time.
Be one less of those people if he did.Fuck off then, you whinging cunt.
There's blessedly few arrogant know it all's here.That very well describes a fair amount of people who post to these forums from my experience, and I'd just add generally unpleasant and that they chat a load of absolute shit half the time.
Well you should know.That very well describes a fair amount of people who post to these forums from my experience, and I'd just add generally unpleasant and that they chat a load of absolute shit half the time.