Chilli.s
mingling jets and statuettes
The one about speed limits on the road is the bestbetter working analogies
The one about speed limits on the road is the bestbetter working analogies
So not actual restrictions to freedom in the present like lockdowns and quarantine, but technological fixes that might enable future State control like apps and vaccine passports?
Don't think I've had the pleasure.The one about speed limits on the road is the best
existentialist explained it, on another thread but the gist of it is a good one:Don't think I've had the pleasure.
Much like the war on terror we have an enemy that doesn't acknowledge borders or rules of engagement. A simple system catogrising threat level that actually was nonsense and ditched . Limiting our freedom to protect our freedom, blaming Americans for fucking things up.
I don't really see the issue with having some concerns about creeping authoritarianism and surveillance as a result of the measures which are understandably put in place as part of a pandemic.
Those are good, constructive questions, and the sort which should always be asked. I rather feel that our interlocutor thinks he already has the answers, though...Yep. Just catching up with this and I liked the same IWNW's post you did.
He's not an antivaccer, conspiranoid nutter. TBH raises some valid questions. I'm not sold on the idea of vaccine passports to enter venues. Which venues. Who's holding the data and for how long etc.
Fair enough, but how are you about unvaccinated people with coronavirus entering enclosed spaces having large crowds?Yep. Just catching up with this and I liked the same IWNW's post you did.
He's not an antivaccer, conspiranoid nutter. TBH raises some valid questions. I'm not sold on the idea of vaccine passports to enter venues. Which venues. Who's holding the data and for how long etc.
Yes, the whole overselling of the vaccine was so bloody stupid - even I fell for it and visited my double-vaxxed friends and family one day back in the summer - where we were all unmasked and indoors some of the time - though my own health is a no-brainer given my lifestyle and my BIL was testing several times a week for work so effectively covered the rest of the family ...Anyway such policies would make more sense if the vaccines offered sterilising immunity. Since they dont, and vaccinated people can still catch and transmit the virus, I'm more likely to support the closure of venues instead, or at least the return of social distancing rules.
Endangering life is a criminal offence.What pupose would it serve to extend the usage of the app? Because power is irresistable to many, and such a system gives people power.
As for tagging, I think there is a difference between how we should treat criminals and how we should treat innocent people in the course of their everyday life.
It would have been slightly less stupid if Delta hadnt come along, because that variant whittled away at vaccine efficacy but the governent didnt want to substantially change or even tweak their plans, apart from the 'freedom day' delay.Yes, the whole overselling of the vaccine was so bloody stupid - even I fell for it and visited my double-vaxxed friends and family one day back in the summer - where we were all unmasked and indoors some of the time - though my own health is a no-brainer given my lifestyle and my BIL was testing several times a week for work so effectively covered the rest of the family ...
I feel sorry for people running such venues, but I won't be visiting any time soon - even if I could be sure people were vaccinated - and the likes of Wetherspoons were already on my "list" ... no hardship for me because I never went to such places in any case ...
There must surely be people out there who know damn well their reckless behaviour has made them a vector of Covid to vulnerable people ...
The sad thing is such people are likely not to be spotted by any analysis of contact-tracing data ... though perhaps such behaviour may ultimately be inferred ...
If everyone cared as much as they should, we probably wouldn't be having this conversation ...
Fair enough, but how are you about unvaccinated people with coronavirus entering enclosed spaces having large crowds?
Lots of places require you to show a ticket before you can get in so what's the difference?The bit I'm not sold on is checking vaccine status as a prerequesit to enter venues.
Cell phone triangulation is quite easy and has been around since at least the '90's.
That's what various social media sites are for, or at least could be repurposed for.
So not actual restrictions to freedom in the present like lockdowns and quarantine, but technological fixes that might enable future State control like apps and vaccine passports?
Anyway such policies would make more sense if the vaccines offered sterilising immunity. Since they dont, and vaccinated people can still catch and transmit the virus, I'm more likely to support the closure of venues instead, or at least the return of social distancing rules.
Fair enough, but how are you about unvaccinated people with coronavirus entering enclosed spaces having large crowds?
Lots of places require you to show a ticket before you can get in so what's the difference?
At airports not only do you need a ticket but you are also checked to make sure you're not taking anything dangerous on board with you. Again what's the difference?
See the bit where I talked about new posters rocking up and starting to moan. I know you've been moaning about Urban for years, because you've been doing it ever since I arrived (and presumably before)Well I've been here 20 years no bans.
I thought we were on about government getting access to be able to track people.I'm not sure what you thought there was in my post to make you think I'd suggested anything to the contrary. But it requires access to the mast data (generally only telcos and government agencies)
Didn't say they were medical procedures. Last time I checked going to the footy, cinema or clubbing were all elective. No one is forcing you to go.Neither of these are medical procedures though, and are largely elective.
the data suggests you're wrong here - anti-vaccine sentiment is more common in deprived and minority ethnic communities, and among the young.I reckon the majority of anti-vaxxers are motivated by a sense of outrage that their privileged lifestyles are being slightly curtailed.
the data suggests you're wrong here - anti-vaccine sentiment is more common in deprived and minority ethnic communities, and among the young.
Show me some data that shows the anti-vaxxers to be a substantially different demographic then, cause otherwise it's just reckons.I think there's a difference between people that are hesitant or resistant to having the vaccine and those that are 'anti-vaxxers' as such tbh, and also those against restrictions which afaik isn't the demographic you mention.
Show me some data that shows the anti-vaxxers to be a substantially different demographic then, cause otherwise it's just reckons.
It'd be really convenient if it was a phenomenon restricted to loudmouth wealthy boomers, but unfortunately it isn't.
It's not restricted to one group, there's different subsets with different reasons and behaviours, and iirc the vaccine hesitant or skeptical ones are the demographics you mentioned (BAME and poor) but the ideological anti-vaxxers/anti-lockdown conspiracy 'theory' types that are producing most of the stuff we talk about here mostly isn't them. Fair enough it's reckons as I'm posting now, but there have been some studies (maybe even posted on here ages ago?) looking at this I'm sure.
presumably your ideological anti-vaxxers are a subset of the 4% who responded negatively to vaccines in the ONS vaccine hesitancy survey? because if they are they're still mostly drawn from poor and BAME demographics. The rich and the over 50s are all on 98-99% pro-vaccine.It's not restricted to one group, there's different subsets with different reasons and behaviours, and iirc the vaccine hesitant or skeptical ones are the demographics you mentioned (BAME and poor) but the ideological anti-vaxxers/anti-lockdown conspiracy 'theory' types that are producing most of the stuff we talk about here mostly isn't them. Fair enough it's reckons as I'm posting now, but there have been some studies (maybe even posted on here ages ago?) looking at this I'm sure.
I thought we were on about government getting access to be able to track people.
Didn't say they were medical procedures. Last time I checked going to the footy, cinema or clubbing were all elective. No one is forcing you to go.
It’s totally unfair to expect retail staff to police the mask policy. What it maybe needs is for local authorities to be given the same powers they have for licensing conditions for pubs/clubs so they can stipulate a minimum number of door staff needed for each outlet to do the job of enforcement.